Posted on 10/31/2016 8:39:46 PM PDT by nickcarraway
FBI agents in April confronted Huma Abedin with an e-mail she received in 2010 warning her that her Yahoo e-mail account — where she’d “routinely” stored State Department messages, including ones containing classified information — may have been compromised. The revelation is contained in a summary of the FBI’s interview with Abedin, conducted on April 5.
Abedin told agents “she was not sure that her e-mail account had ever been compromised,” according to notes of the interview, conducted as part of the FBI’s investigation of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s unsecured and unauthorized home e-mail server. Abedin served as Clinton’s deputy chief of staff and is currently vice chair of her presidential campaign.
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
where she’d “routinely” stored State Department message
Idiot or spy?
“May have been” means just that, namely, “no controlling legal authority.” The only proof is . . . Wikileaks! And even that is not a hack. Just a little old leak.
Idiot AND spy.
This is one arrogant bunch of f’in skunks. The prosecutorial error that has been made since day 1 was the failure to prosecute HRC et al for the clear fact that classified information was moved off the gov’t server. Period, end of subject.
And not or.
Spydiot.
;’}
She received her security clearance in 2009. Why does she still have it?
Yes.
I like it.
“She explained that “it was difficult” to print from the State printer, so she printed the documents at home.”
She is the personal aide for the Secretary of State of the United States government and she says it is hard to print documents at work? She is lying or incompetent or both.
Human, it looks like every geek, dweeb and gamer with an HP Pavilion tapped your Yahoo account.
Idiot is too friendly a term to describe Mata Habedin.
just more proof the FBI threw the investigation corrupt FBI
You owe skunks (both the f'in and non-f'in type) an apology for that comparison.
Normally, TS clearances are for 5 years. Secret clearances last for 10 years.
SCI varies depending on the program.
She likely does not have a clearance to access the stuff that has been exposed.
2010.
That is 4 years earlier than the massive Yahoo breach of 500 million user accounts in 2014.
I imagine printing classified documents and removing them from the building involved signing them out (and back in) with a log book of some sort...and following procedure was the ‘difficult’ part. Rules are for peasants...so Yahoo it was.
She is the personal aide for the Secretary of State of the United States government and she says it is hard to print documents at work? She is lying or incompetent or both.
Yes, those nasty National Security buzz kills at the State Dept do make it rather difficult to print out Top Secret, Special Access Compartmentalized on the State Dept printers.
That's kind of the point.
Things you are allowed to print are really easy to get printed up by a veritable army of aides, secretaries and IT pros at the beck and call of the Number Two chief of staff and prime confidant to the Sec of State and vying for their attention and approval.
It's just the stuff you are not supposed to be printing because it's on a secure network for handling Top Secret information or the stuff you don't want others to know that you are printing because it qualifies as illegal espionage that can be a bit of pain.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.