Posted on 09/10/2016 6:12:22 PM PDT by AnthonySoprano
-
Did you notice Hillary's new hairstyle?
Suddenly, both ears are covered. This is the setup and prep for the debates.
That women was getting instruction via a sophisticated earpiece - and she is laying the groundwork for doing it again in the debates.
The lapdog Media refuses to cover it.
Freepers are amazing! Thanks for setting the record straight. That graphic is on twitter.
Probably a guy from the ‘Village People’.
I believe some broadcasters also use Bluetooth-based units for in-ear monitoring. BT runs in the 2.4 GHz ISM RF band and employs frequency hopping techniques with the carrier modulated using Gaussian Frequency Shift Keying (GFSK). Not sure what the audio baseband BW is for these, but I would think it would be broader than 4kHz.
4kHz (actually 300Hz - 3300Hz) is the baseband bandwidth of the Plain Old Telephone System receivers. Note that for simple human intelligibility in a voice system, wider BW's (like stereo @ 15Hz - 22kHz) are unnecessary, and thus you save a lot of bucks on bandwidth.
He is retired United States Navy Reserve Chief Culinary Specialist Oscar Flores.
The only reason he could be there in uniform is because it was a Memorial Day parade and not a political event. Cough, cough, sure it wasn't.
"Ceterum censeo Hillary esse delendam."
Garde la Foi, mes amis! Nous nous sommes les sauveurs de la République! Maintenant et Toujours!
(Keep the Faith, my friends! We are the saviors of the Republic! Now and Forever!)
LonePalm, le Républicain du verre cassé (The Broken Glass Republican)
What about Bills shoes, lol and his salute to somebody, what a couple of O’s
There certainly is a reason to jam it. Neither side should have any unfair advantage. She already has 3 liberal debate moderators who will work for her. I would not be surprised if Hillary's people were found to be involved with debate question development/selection. I would also assume that at a minimum the questions will be leaked to her people in advance.
I hope Trump and his people are taking the debates very very seriously. There is a lot at risk and they could swing the election either way. I hope his people are smart enough to train him on how to deal with the usual Democrat tactics. Questions that deal with minute details of certain laws or foreign policy issues must be deflected skillfully otherwise he'll look like an idiot trying to bluff his way through them. I expect the usual array of questions on abortion, LGBT crap, women's issues, and other "soft" issues with limited hard treatment to the economy, real employment data, serious immigration/refugee, the military, etc..
Well a Navy Enlisted....but point taken.
(black leather instead of gold braid chinstrap above the visor and no shoulder boards is enlisted (likely a chief petty officer, but I can’t see the sleeve)
“300Hz to 4 khz. Very narrow range. Easily jammed.”
Narrow, indeed. That isn’t even RF. Heck, I can hear 4Khz even with my tinnitus!
it would be really interesting to have a high-quality scanner in the venue. Those folks talking about taking a jammer would be ill advised to do so, as triangulating on such a signal would be childs play for the SS.
“Probably a guy from the ‘Village People’.”
In any case, he needs to be careful about disgracing that uniform.
Man, that picture of Hill with her hand to her mouth looks really strange with the bulge at the back of her jaw.
just jam it at an important time..not continuosly
Feeling is mutual and SS has no obligation to make sure her earpieces can work.
Yes fine, i read that 300-4 khz in an article posted yesterday.
Whatever band range it can be jammed. Trump can afford one that can frequency hop if thats what it needs to do. Even partial jamming would make it very annoying and potentially useless noise.
GMTA ...
Now that is deplorable.
tee-hee! :) She will never live that comment down. No way.
They operate on a set of channels at predefined frequencies. From the example above: 57 Synthesized Channels in the 216-217 MHz LPRS Band Under FCC Part 95
That doesn't mean a jammer or non-FCC compliant transmitter couldn't over power the system the Clinton campaign is using.
I would do something like vary what she is hearing from a high volume screech, to music such as The girl from Impanema, to a dog barking, to fingernails on a blackboard, to any number of things.
If you could listen in to what is being said you could trigger a loud sound just at a key point and let Cankles try and figure out what she missed.
"Ceterum censeo Hillary esse delendam."
Garde la Foi, mes amis! Nous nous sommes les sauveurs de la République! Maintenant et Toujours!
(Keep the Faith, my friends! We are the saviors of the Republic! Now and Forever!)
LonePalm, le Républicain du verre cassé (The Broken Glass Republican)
>I would suggest recording the signals, then playing an ad showing the signals and her answers/ <
nobody would believe it
I have an old Optoelectronics “frequency counter” which is a “near field receiver” that will identify every broadcasting frequency, as they say, from DC to daylight starting with the closest. The Opto then will tune a broadband receiver to any frequency detected. It is what folks used to use to listen to cell phone calls before they were scrambled. You would get close to the caller, the frequency would be detected and the radio tuned and the conversation revealed. When the frequency changed due to a new cell tower the new frequency would be detected and so on.
All Trump needs to do is detect the frequency, record the broadcast and simulcast it. End of Hillary.
Really not a very complex task for a knowledgeable radio person.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.