Posted on 08/11/2016 3:31:04 AM PDT by ToxicMich
Donald Trump on Wednesday again slammed Hillary Clinton and her campaign for allowing the father of Orlando shooter Omar Mateen to sit in the stands behind her at a recent rally.
But sitting behind Trump was ex-congressman Mark Foley, who resigned in disgrace in 2006 after sending sexually explicit messages to underage teenage boys.
(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...
How many channels have lost their broadcast license?
Yet Hellary’s top aide is a Weinerphile.
They are getting really desperate folks.
Four words to throw back int he face of the media:
Foley is old news.
Anyone seen a picture proving that indeed this was the Mark Foley? Where is it?
Free pass for hil, added scrutiny for Trump.
Look up the Youtube video on Right Side BRoadcasting of last niht’s rally and you will see him on the right habd side of the screen, He has whoite hair, a red shirt, and a black jacket as I recall.
Well at least Foley didn’t rape any women like Bill Clinton did, nor did he abandon 42 Americans to die in Benghazi in a 13 hour battle, like Hillary did.
But let’s get that media faux outrage machine rolling!
Foley isn’t for sharia
And ran a gay prostitution ring out of his basement, IIRC.
**************
Correct, basically.
It was his boyfriend who ran the gay hustler service. He recruited boys from the nearby high school.
Acknowledge the oversight (if called to do so) and move on. Then, when peppered with question after question about the same thing (as the media is wont to do), you can say, "The campaign has addressed this issue and is moving on." Or, when the evening "panels" of Trump-bashers follow-up and follow-up, beating this dead horse, your spokesperson (I would use that Pierson girl every chance I get) can "wonder" aloud what sort of interest in pedophilia the media has that they keep bringing this "issue" up when Trump has already addressed this. Maybe even opine as to whether or not they are in support of making Pedophilia the next human right (as some of them actually do).
Gets liberalism/socialism in the media on full-frontal display (sorry for the image.)
Didn't think so.
“CNN hosts and Hillary surrogates object, saying Foley is a pedophile, and this is about the campaigns, neither campaign should allow a controversial person to appear in camera view.”
PIAPS allows Huma in view. How is a married woman’s lesbian lover less offensive?
Agree/
:: sending sexually explicit messages to underage teenage boys ::
CNN is making sh!t up AGAIN. That is not the true description of events.
If it was Boehner, then the headline would have used the term “Disgraceful”.
For CNN, Foley’s sin is being GOP.
They applaud this normally at CNN
While the impeached rapist ex-president stands beside his wife, Hillary Clinton.
Sooner or later, rank and file Trump supporters may realize that the Republican party does NOT want Trump to be elected. I’m not talking about the mythical GOPe but the GOP itself.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.