Posted on 07/31/2016 7:03:45 PM PDT by Hojczyk
Julian Assange: So, those Hillary Clinton emails, they connect together with the cables that we have published of Hillary Clinton, creating a rich picture of how Hillary Clinton performs in office, but, more broadly, how the U.S. Department of State operates.
So, for example, the disastrous, absolutely disastrous intervention in Libya, the destruction of the Gaddafi government, which led to the occupation of ISIS of large segments of that country, weapons flows going over to Syria, being pushed by Hillary Clinton, into jihadists within Syria, including ISIS, that’s there in those emails. There’s more than 1,700 emails in Hillary Clinton’s collection, that we have released, just about Libya alone.
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
Trump could and should win the election on this issue alone. The problem is that the GOP supported Hillary/State Department arming Jihadists in Libya & Syria. It was a bipartisan F*ck up and the GOP doesn’t want Trump to make an issue out of this perfidy.
I don’t know. The article is dated for today, but it says that Assange made this statement on Tues. So, it must be in this last batch of emails.
Has this allegation been made anywhere else, or corroborated by any other sources, or (just as important) Cackled at by Cankles?
You misunderstand. I was merely pretending to be a gerbilist protecting Clinton by attaching Russia to the emails.
“. There’s more than 1,700 emails in Hillary Clinton’s collection, that we have released, just about Libya alone.”
WOW!!
We know how the Clintons work.
How reliable is Gateway Pundit?
VERY
This matches what CIA pilot Robert Tosh Plumlee was saying 2 years ago.
It also matches what Dr Steve Pieczenik, the Real life Jack Ryan, has been saying since Benghazi day one.
McCain’s hands are all over this. August 30 will be a huge shock for him
They are very reliable and so is WIKILEAKS.
As for the click and bait comments it’s called, “Ad Block”.
Get the best one out there for your Internet Browser. That way you see the article only.
Sorry, but whenever I hear “conservative journalists” of late, every gag reflex I have goes Full Armageddon.
JMHO, if we want true and objective investigative study (or even “journalism”, if that’s what turns your wheels) of this or any other significant topic related even remotely to the election...we’re just going to have to do the damn job ourselves.
...and after we get those facts all in a row and ready for law enforcement, courts, etc......we may very well have to do that deal as well.
I guess you’d have to say I’m suffering from a severe case of “suspension of disbelief” when dealing with these persons.
/sarc
Is this coming out, came out, is it definitive?
I’m getting confused with which leaks are coming when :)
But I CANT WAIT to see her destroyed.
What about Breitbart??? Or Drudge??? OANN is also a news source that has VERY unbiased news coverage!!!
I'm sure there's a lot of pieces there one could string together and interpret etc. I'd be surprised if one email contained a smoking gun. Of course I would love to be wrong.
But the Clintons have been at this a long time and are used to being investigated and watched. Of course that's why she had her own server. Even so .. I suspect the real meat was conducted using her phone and not email. We will see.
She will say they accidentally fell into ISIS’ hands unless there is more definiteive proof.
It’s more than enough for me but the mAsses will need the dots connected for them.
There is an awful lot of talk about mystery emails that never seem to show up.
LOL!!
You give a correct analysis I believe.
This sounds big.
Didn’t say she would be, said she’d be lucky to be...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.