Incitement to riot.
Isn’t that an actionable action?
Are there police who are illegals in these cities? Anyone know?
This is not America. This is some third-world fever swamp.
The ignorant and the blind are leading the halt and the lame.
It’s becoming popular for Democrats to riot and destroy when they don’t like someone. They do this so the public will live in fear. Nazis did this in the 1930’s
Emmett Rensin
Born: January 20, 1990 (age 26),
Isn’t it time to take the party DIRECTLY to those who wish to celebrate?
You say something they don’t like, or believe something they don’t want you to believe, and then supposedly you’re “inciting” them to violence, which is supposed to be equivalent to, and excuse, their actual violence. These people are shameless fascists.
It’s going to be an interesting summer.
Like 1968..., 1972 Dims lose.
Where is the law? It sleeps with the fishes.
Stupid kid. He’d be the first one whining if he got what he wished for and it blew back at him, as it always does.
Have you seen his photo? A pajama baby whose claim to fame is a book about the greatest Twitter posts. This is what fame is in modern America.
This has to stop. While Trump benefits and wins as more Americans see what Democrats are doing—rioting, violence, burning the American flay, why raising the Mexican flag—it is destructive to the country. Democrats need to think carefully what they are doing and the consequences. Clinton, Sanders, and all Democrats, legal and illegal, own this, not Trump. They cannot lay this at Trump’s doorstep.
Bump
What we saw in San Jose was terrorism defined by the FBI...
Terrorism:
The use of violence and intimidation in the pursuit of political aims.
Hillary studied the Saul Alinsky rules and she lives by them, this is part of the terrorism we are seeing today with what happens to the Trump rallies...
Saul Alinsky’s 12 Rules for Radicals
Here is the complete list from Alinsky.
* RULE 1: “Power is not only what you have, but what the enemy thinks you have.” Power is derived from 2 main sources – money and people. “Have-Nots” must build power from flesh and blood. (These are two things of which there is a plentiful supply. Government and corporations always have a difficult time appealing to people, and usually do so almost exclusively with economic arguments.)
* RULE 2: “Never go outside the expertise of your people.” It results in confusion, fear and retreat. Feeling secure adds to the backbone of anyone. (Organizations under attack wonder why radicals don’t address the “real” issues. This is why. They avoid things with which they have no knowledge.)
* RULE 3: “Whenever possible, go outside the expertise of the enemy.” Look for ways to increase insecurity, anxiety and uncertainty. (This happens all the time. Watch how many organizations under attack are blind-sided by seemingly irrelevant arguments that they are then forced to address.)
* RULE 4: “Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules.” If the rule is that every letter gets a reply, send 30,000 letters. You can kill them with this because no one can possibly obey all of their own rules. (This is a serious rule. The besieged entity’s very credibility and reputation is at stake, because if activists catch it lying or not living up to its commitments, they can continue to chip away at the damage.)
* RULE 5: “Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.” There is no defense. It’s irrational. It’s infuriating. It also works as a key pressure point to force the enemy into concessions. (Pretty crude, rude and mean, huh? They want to create anger and fear.)
* RULE 6: “A good tactic is one your people enjoy.” They’ll keep doing it without urging and come back to do more. They’re doing their thing, and will even suggest better ones. (Radical activists, in this sense, are no different that any other human being. We all avoid “un-fun” activities, and but we revel at and enjoy the ones that work and bring results.)
* RULE 7: “A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag.” Don’t become old news. (Even radical activists get bored. So to keep them excited and involved, organizers are constantly coming up with new tactics.)
* RULE 8: “Keep the pressure on. Never let up.” Keep trying new things to keep the opposition off balance. As the opposition masters one approach, hit them from the flank with something new. (Attack, attack, attack from all sides, never giving the reeling organization a chance to rest, regroup, recover and re-strategize.)
* RULE 9: “The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself.” Imagination and ego can dream up many more consequences than any activist. (Perception is reality. Large organizations always prepare a worst-case scenario, something that may be furthest from the activists’ minds. The upshot is that the organization will expend enormous time and energy, creating in its own collective mind the direst of conclusions. The possibilities can easily poison the mind and result in demoralization.)
* RULE 10: “If you push a negative hard enough, it will push through and become a positive.” Violence from the other side can win the public to your side because the public sympathizes with the underdog. (Unions used this tactic. Peaceful [albeit loud] demonstrations during the heyday of unions in the early to mid-20th Century incurred management’s wrath, often in the form of violence that eventually brought public sympathy to their side.)
* RULE 11: “The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative.” Never let the enemy score points because you’re caught without a solution to the problem. (Old saw: If you’re not part of the solution, you’re part of the problem. Activist organizations have an agenda, and their strategy is to hold a place at the table, to be given a forum to wield their power. So, they have to have a compromise solution.)
* RULE 12: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.” Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions. (This is cruel, but very effective. Direct, personalized criticism and ridicule works.)
In a strange sort of way, this might be not the worst thing that could happen. Everyone is at least somewhat afraid that the conventions could be “party like it’s 1968”, only with everyone armed and more people who have zero respect for authority. Since it’s gotten out of hand, there has to be some consensus about how to deal with unruly anarchists and paid protestors. It that doesn’t happen, there could be a Summer of Violence that gets totally out of control.
“Destroying property is legitimate. Shouting down is legitimate. Disruption of all events is legitimate. Murder isn’t.”
Smash Emmett’s computer then while screaming in his ear. Hey, its legitimate. ;-)
La Raza
MEChA
CAIR
CPUSA
Geprge Soros organizations
(A record 94,708,000 Americans were not in the labor force in May -- 664,000 more than in April)....rife for enemies of Freedom to strike using the election as a front. Put anyone in leadership who is enforcing this mess with their voices, put them in jail. Pouring inflammatory rhetoric on this mess, is criminal and must be stopped. Call out the law enforcers whoever they are in every state. America is being abused by Socialist/Marxist and a leaderless Oval Office....which has poured gas on this situation also. Obama should be Impeached!
I knew it was only going to get worse.
These people are in a tailspin. Underneath the belligerence lies a fragility; they are essentially cracking up.
Just wait until the conventions. They’re going to make San Jose look like a playground fight.