Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is There Ample Evidence To Indict Hillary? This Judge (Napolitano) Thinks So
ZeroHedge ^ | May 26, 2016

Posted on 05/26/2016 9:46:16 PM PDT by Zakeet

After the latest State Department announcement that Hillary Clinton violated government rules, Judge Andrew Napolitano definitively says there is now ample evidence to indict. Sadly, he is much less certain on whether or not the indictment will actually come.

Here is Napolitano's case as he laid it out to Bill O'reilly:

"Today is a big deal for a couple of reasons. First, it directly refutes a statement she has made dozens of times, 'it was allowed', we now know that it was not allowed. She never even asked."

"She signed a two page statement under oath on her first day on the job which was given after she had a two hour tutorial by two FBI agents telling her about the proper care and legal obligations for state secrets. In that oath she swore that she had the obligation to know how to care for state secrets and to recognize them."

"Here is what's new in the report today. Her server in her house went down a couple of times, and when it went down the blackberry wouldn't work. The state department IT people said 'here use a state department blackberry', and she said through her assistant Huma Abedin 'no because we are concerned with the Freedom of Information Act', so she went dark and she had documents verbally read to her rather than transmitted to her through the state department email system."

When Bill O'reilly was surprised to hear about the fact that Clinton was concerned about having documents subject to FOIA, Napolitano hammers home the the point that now the FBI has intent.

"Now what does this tell the FBI? This shows intent. You don't have to prove intent when you're talking about espionage, you can prove it by gross negligence, there's ample evidence of gross negligence. But avoiding the transparency laws shows a consciousness of evading the requirements."

On whether or not Napolitano believes, after all of the above, that Clinton will actually be indicted, the judge wasn't so sure.

"I believe there's ample evidence to indict her and the only way she wouldn't be is if the president or the attorney general makes a political decision."

And just as we said long ago, Napolitano also believes that one way or another, the FBI will get the evidence out to the public.

"Whether she's indicted or not I believe we'll learn what it is. I believe it'll happen before the Democratic National Convention in Philadelphia, that's two months."

* * *

Well then, based on Obama's guarantee that there will be absolutely no political influence in the decision on whether or not the DOJ decides to indict, we should expect the indictment in the coming months... right?


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: New York
KEYWORDS: 2016election; clinton; clintongate; election2016; email; hillary; napolitano; newyork; scandal; soshillary; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 next last
To: TigersEye

Amen....but it is the JUST US Dept. now.....no Democrats will be punished.


21 posted on 05/27/2016 2:49:49 AM PDT by Ann Archy (ABORTION....... The HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

If the rule of law is dead, NO ONE need obey ANY law. That is anarchy.


22 posted on 05/27/2016 2:53:58 AM PDT by NTHockey (Rules of engagement #1: Take no prisoners. And to the NSA trolls, FU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

ping


23 posted on 05/27/2016 3:38:34 AM PDT by Cyclone59 (Where are we going, and what's with the handbasket?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet
Best possible scenario for me:

She hangs in as the Dem candidate

Trump walks all over her in a landslide

2 days after the loss to Trump, she is indicted and held as a flight risk

24 posted on 05/27/2016 4:23:55 AM PDT by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim from C-Town
I don’t know if she can be removed from ballots once nominated. Does anyone know if they can change candidates once they nominate one?

I don't know for certain, but I'm guessing there must be a way to do it. For example (speaking in general terms now, not Hillary) suppose a candidate were to be nominated, then suffered a stroke and was obviously in no condition to continue to run for the office. There has to be a way to replace that nominee.

25 posted on 05/27/2016 4:30:52 AM PDT by GreenHornet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

Does he ever get anything right?


26 posted on 05/27/2016 4:42:00 AM PDT by jpsb (Never believe anything in politics until it has been officially denied. Otto von Bismark)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet
country club prison


27 posted on 05/27/2016 4:47:56 AM PDT by bert ((K.E.; N.P.; GOPc;+12, 73, ....Opabinia can teach us a lot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BigEdLB

What will benefit the Democrat party most?

an unindicted Hillary, General Election loss

An indicted Hillary, Bernie loss

An indicted Hillary, Biden loss

To insure there are no corruption charges slipping out and onto the party, Hillary must go. Hillary will go.

No corruption charges can be attached to a Bernie loss


28 posted on 05/27/2016 4:53:43 AM PDT by bert ((K.E.; N.P.; GOPc;+12, 73, ....Opabinia can teach us a lot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Jim from C-Town

Generally, state laws require that candidates on the general election ballot be formally nominated by their political party’s national convention held in a presidential election year. The laws vary by state.

So theoretically, the Dems could re-open their national convention and have the delegates nominate a replacement. Whether or not their party rules allow for such a process is another story. There could also be state laws that require the nominee’s name to have been on a primary ballot or to have been selected by party caucus.

Another limitation would be state deadlines for political parties to submit the names of their nominees to the SOS for placement on the general election ballots. Typically, it’s at least 60 days before the general election. Sometimes more.


29 posted on 05/27/2016 5:18:03 AM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. ~Steve Earle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan

They will just use the Lautenberg exemption.


30 posted on 05/27/2016 5:24:25 AM PDT by Mouton (The insurrection laws maintain the status quo now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

There was ample evidence to indict her on the cattle futures thing 25 years ago....what makes anyone think they will do anything now?


31 posted on 05/27/2016 5:31:43 AM PDT by Ouderkirk (To the left, everything must evidence that this or that strand of leftist theory is true)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: r_barton
I bet it goes down like this. Hillary goes to the convention and picks Joe Biden as her vice president. The convention elects the team, shutting out Bernie Sanders. After the convention, Clinton steps aside and Joe Biden goes to the top of the ticket and picks another vice president (ala George McGovern, Eagleton and Shriver).

Sounds about right, except...well, Biden doesn't have a billion dollars like Al Gore has.

32 posted on 05/27/2016 5:48:12 AM PDT by Buttons12 ( It Can't Happen Here -- Sinclair Lewis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

This is why Trump will win. We simply cannot turn a blind “equal justice under the law” eye to Hillary’s obvious crimes just because she is a big government official - they do that in communist countries, not democracies bound by the rule of law.

People are sick of two justice systems.


33 posted on 05/27/2016 5:50:40 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

There is more than ample evidence that she was, intentionally, trying to evade scrutiny of her money laundering scheme, The Clinton Foundation, by use of her office and personnel on US TAXPAYERS time.

But getting THIS administration and THIS puppet AG to convene a Grand Jury to present this evidence is next to impossible. The only way this could happen is if the FBI goes public, one way or another, with the evidence and the public outcry becomes deafening. And even then, they will put it off until after the election, if at all......................


34 posted on 05/27/2016 6:17:52 AM PDT by Red Badger (WE DON'T NEED NO STEENKING TAGLINES!...........................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

35 posted on 05/27/2016 7:08:21 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/republican_delegate_count.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

They’ve got her dead to rights... but the lowlifes at the DOJ love their criminals... gonna be interesting...


36 posted on 05/27/2016 8:19:50 AM PDT by GOPJ (Clinton was impeached for LYING UNDER OATH in a SEXUAL HARASSMENT case NOT for an affair.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ROCKLOBSTER

I guess ugly is in the eye of the beholder. To me she’s ugly as sin.


37 posted on 05/27/2016 11:00:22 AM PDT by VerySadAmerican (The day Trump is sworn in I'm changing my screen name.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

At this point in the election, it would be better if the FBI & JD NOT indict Clinton. Any indictment would prompt Obama to grant her a pardon for past & current crimes, letting her go scot free.

The truth is out now. Even liberal reporters are questioning her ethics & veracity. Her campaign is faltering badly & will continue to do so with the IG report.

If we hold the indictment until Obama is out of office, that gives the Trump AG the opportunity to try, convict, & jail this witch, something she richly deserves. I believe a president Trump & his AG will do it with gusto. It’s worth waiting 8 months to see her in an orange jump suit. Be patient.


38 posted on 05/27/2016 11:59:43 AM PDT by Mister Da (The mark of a wise man is not what he knows, but what he knows he doesn't know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan

Laws and rules have never hampered Democrats.


39 posted on 05/27/2016 11:03:42 PM PDT by Jim from C-Town (The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: VerySadAmerican
To me she’s ugly as sin.

Well she usually is.

Bucktoothed, wrinkled up forehead...making some stupid-looking rubber face....just like her mother.

40 posted on 05/28/2016 5:22:00 PM PDT by ROCKLOBSTER (Trump: A Bull in a RINO closet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson