Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge upholds North Carolina's voter ID law
The Hill ^ | April 25, 2016 | Cyra Master

Posted on 04/25/2016 7:32:00 PM PDT by jazusamo

A federal judge on Monday night upheld North Carolina’s voter ID law, the Charlotte Observer reported.

Judge Thomas Schroeder issued a 485-page ruling posted online Monday evening, dismissing all claims in the challenge to the state’s 2013 election law overhaul.

Schroeder, appointed by George W. Bush, also upheld portions of the law that cut the number of days people could vote early and eliminated same-day registration and voting allowances.

"This ruling further affirms that requiring a photo ID in order to vote is not only common-sense, it's constitutional," Gov. Pat McCrory said in a statement.

Opponents immediately condemned the decision.

"The sweeping barriers imposed by this law undermine voter participation and have an overwhelmingly discriminatory impact on African-Americans,” Dale Ho, director of the ACLU’s Voting Rights Project, said in a statement to the Observer.

An appeal to the ruling is likely, and many expect the case to go all the way to the Supreme Court.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: North Carolina
KEYWORDS: earlyvoting; id; judgeschroeder; northcarolina; samedayregistration; voter; voterfraud; voterid
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
Good for Judge Thomas Schroeder and North Carolina, common sense prevails at least for now.
1 posted on 04/25/2016 7:32:01 PM PDT by jazusamo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Good news.


2 posted on 04/25/2016 7:35:34 PM PDT by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Of course, the dems immediately cry racism.


3 posted on 04/25/2016 7:35:45 PM PDT by mtrott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

TOO LATE for a SCOTUS review this year. HUGE blow to Demoncats.


4 posted on 04/25/2016 7:37:51 PM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Would “The Hill” have noted that Clinton/Obama appointed the judge had it been the case, and had the judge gone the other way?


5 posted on 04/25/2016 7:38:00 PM PDT by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
The sweeping barriers imposed by this law undermine voter participation and have an overwhelmingly discriminatory impact on African-Americans.

How?

6 posted on 04/25/2016 7:38:19 PM PDT by Petrosius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

The Supreme Court expressly upheld voter ID laws back in 2008. If I recall it was a 6/3 decision.

Of course “settled law” does not apply to liberals.


7 posted on 04/25/2016 7:39:08 PM PDT by kennedy (No relation to those other Kennedys.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Petrosius

By not allowing them to vote multiple times.


8 posted on 04/25/2016 7:39:22 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("If voting made any difference they wouldn't let us do it." --Samuel Clemens)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: EDINVA

I hear you, doubtful.


9 posted on 04/25/2016 7:39:47 PM PDT by jazusamo (Have YOU Donated to Free Republic? https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Well at least the GOP can probably hold NC this election then. We need tough voter ID laws in WI, PA and OH now. Democrat vote fraud has been rampant in Milwaukee, Philadelphia and Cleveland the past 2 elections.


10 posted on 04/25/2016 7:40:26 PM PDT by Angels27
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Petrosius

The Ballots are written in Cursive?


11 posted on 04/25/2016 7:42:00 PM PDT by Kickass Conservative (It is better to live one day as a lion than one hundred years as a sheep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

I wonder what crazy moonbat social justice warrior white male hating nutjob lawyers hillary has lined up to appoint


12 posted on 04/25/2016 7:42:16 PM PDT by GregoTX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Please bump the Freepathon or click above to donate or become a monthly donor!

13 posted on 04/25/2016 7:43:08 PM PDT by jazusamo (Have YOU Donated to Free Republic? https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Only judges appointed by Democrats are allowed to issue definitive rulings on this subject.


14 posted on 04/25/2016 7:44:00 PM PDT by Steely Tom (Vote GOP: A Slower Handbasket)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

North Carolina is kicking some commie ‘RAT liberal ass this month. Outstanding. Shout out to North Carolinians.


15 posted on 04/25/2016 7:53:41 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (If SCOTUS is really so fair and unbiased, why is it a campaign issue about who is on it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

This is like a breath of fresh air in a global warming environment caused by the global warming politicians.


16 posted on 04/25/2016 7:56:06 PM PDT by seawolf101 (This)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Way to go, Judge...

We’ll expect to hear from Rev. William “The Buffet Slayer” Barber screaming about this very soon....


17 posted on 04/25/2016 8:02:41 PM PDT by JBW1949
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Why the heck does it take nearly 500 pages to write, “No”?? Getting too wordy opens his opinion up for appeals.


18 posted on 04/25/2016 8:39:26 PM PDT by bgill (CDC site, "We still do not know exactly how people are infected with Ebola")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

One liberal court to overturn. Then a tied supreme court and voter fraud is inculcated forever in the republic. They are so close. So close. Still think Scalia was natural causes. I don’t anymore.


19 posted on 04/25/2016 8:43:57 PM PDT by Nuc 1.1 (Nuc 1 Liberals aren't Patriots. Remember 1789!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

485 page ruling? How in the world does it possibly take a ruling as large as a mid-size novel to adjudicate common sense?

Anyway, great news. Maybe he has ironclad case law in the 485 pages that will help other states.


20 posted on 04/25/2016 8:57:51 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson