Good for Judge Thomas Schroeder and North Carolina, common sense prevails at least for now.
1 posted on
04/25/2016 7:32:01 PM PDT by
jazusamo
To: jazusamo
To: jazusamo
Of course, the dems immediately cry racism.
3 posted on
04/25/2016 7:35:45 PM PDT by
mtrott
To: jazusamo
TOO LATE for a SCOTUS review this year. HUGE blow to Demoncats.
4 posted on
04/25/2016 7:37:51 PM PDT by
montag813
To: jazusamo
Would “The Hill” have noted that Clinton/Obama appointed the judge had it been the case, and had the judge gone the other way?
5 posted on
04/25/2016 7:38:00 PM PDT by
EDINVA
To: jazusamo
The sweeping barriers imposed by this law undermine voter participation and have an overwhelmingly discriminatory impact on African-Americans. How?
6 posted on
04/25/2016 7:38:19 PM PDT by
Petrosius
To: jazusamo
The Supreme Court expressly upheld voter ID laws back in 2008. If I recall it was a 6/3 decision.
Of course “settled law” does not apply to liberals.
7 posted on
04/25/2016 7:39:08 PM PDT by
kennedy
(No relation to those other Kennedys.)
To: jazusamo
Well at least the GOP can probably hold NC this election then. We need tough voter ID laws in WI, PA and OH now. Democrat vote fraud has been rampant in Milwaukee, Philadelphia and Cleveland the past 2 elections.
10 posted on
04/25/2016 7:40:26 PM PDT by
Angels27
To: jazusamo
I wonder what crazy moonbat social justice warrior white male hating nutjob lawyers hillary has lined up to appoint
12 posted on
04/25/2016 7:42:16 PM PDT by
GregoTX
Please bump the Freepathon or click above to donate or become a monthly donor!
13 posted on
04/25/2016 7:43:08 PM PDT by
jazusamo
(Have YOU Donated to Free Republic? https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: jazusamo
Only judges appointed by Democrats are allowed to issue definitive rulings on this subject.
14 posted on
04/25/2016 7:44:00 PM PDT by
Steely Tom
(Vote GOP: A Slower Handbasket)
To: jazusamo
North Carolina is kicking some commie ‘RAT liberal ass this month. Outstanding. Shout out to North Carolinians.
15 posted on
04/25/2016 7:53:41 PM PDT by
FlingWingFlyer
(If SCOTUS is really so fair and unbiased, why is it a campaign issue about who is on it?)
To: jazusamo
This is like a breath of fresh air in a global warming environment caused by the global warming politicians.
To: jazusamo
Why the heck does it take nearly 500 pages to write, “No”?? Getting too wordy opens his opinion up for appeals.
18 posted on
04/25/2016 8:39:26 PM PDT by
bgill
(CDC site, "We still do not know exactly how people are infected with Ebola")
To: jazusamo
One liberal court to overturn. Then a tied supreme court and voter fraud is inculcated forever in the republic. They are so close. So close. Still think Scalia was natural causes. I don’t anymore.
19 posted on
04/25/2016 8:43:57 PM PDT by
Nuc 1.1
(Nuc 1 Liberals aren't Patriots. Remember 1789!)
To: jazusamo
485 page ruling? How in the world does it possibly take a ruling as large as a mid-size novel to adjudicate common sense?
Anyway, great news. Maybe he has ironclad case law in the 485 pages that will help other states.
To: jazusamo
22 posted on
04/26/2016 1:50:36 AM PDT by
rrrod
(just an old guy with a gun in his pocket.l)
To: jazusamo
How does this discriminate against African Americans?
They have driver’s licenses or at least an ID card- or can get an ID card easily.
25 posted on
04/26/2016 4:24:04 AM PDT by
patriot08
(5th generation Texan ...(girl type) Run the slimy Canadian lawyer= HELLO HILLARY!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
