Posted on 04/23/2016 12:44:05 AM PDT by Right-wing Librarian
"Look at a recent still photo of Cruz on the trail the next time you get a chance. He’s not looking happy... Cruz’s Mom and Dad DID become Canadian citizens."
"They were not only registered to vote, but they were registered with the Alberta, Canada Health Services. Provable Canadian citizenship required."
(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...
No, as I said before the Social Security Number is presumably located in the data field underneath that number.
Hmmm...little Teddy is nothing more than a well (maybe even over) educated Canuck. He needs to go home...he’s become very, very difficult person to like - even here in Texas.
Ted was probably born out of wedlock because his father was married and had a family here in the US.
That could be why her ex husband’s name is tagged on to her name on Ted’s BC.
It is also thought that she had renounced her US citizenship and was a British citizen and her citizenship in Canada was basically transferred when moving to Canada.
That would make Ted ineligible.
None of the Judges ruling on Ted’d eligibility have seen Ted’s sealed documents.
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/muckraker/ted-cruz-mother-canadian-voter-list
Highly unlikely that Ted’s parents would have both lied to the pair of Canadian official enumerators that visited their door in the late 1960’s - 1970. The Cruz campaign denies that Ted’s parents had become citizens. Ted’ father, Raphael, confessed that he had been a Canadian citizen and retained his Canadian citizenship until 2005. Rafael was a Canadian for some 35-40 years. He’s been an American for 10 years. We are unaware that there has been a declarative statement by Ted or more importantly, his mother -Eleanor, stating that at no time did she become a British citizen or Canadian citizen.
From the TPM article:
>>In accordance with the Canadian Election Act, such lists were compiled in the 1970s by a pair of officials, called enumerators, who went door-to-door together in an electoral district to ascertain the name, address and occupation of any person qualified to vote. The statute states that enumerators who “willfully and without reasonable excuse” added a name to the list “of any person who is not entitled to have his name entered thereon” forfeited pay for their services and were be subject to other punishments.
Another election official, called a returning officer, then reviewed the list. The statute states that the returning officer could not certify the document if he believed the list contained the name of any person who shouldn’t be included. The document obtained by TPM was certified in Calgary by a returning officer.
In 2013, a Canadian elections official told TPM that in the process of compiling the list, enumerators asked people to affirm that they were Canadian citizens.
“So when they knock on doors, they ask them: are you Canadian citizens, are you 18 years of age or older, and are you a resident in this facility and how long have you been living here?” Drew Westwater, the director of election operations and communications for Elections Alberta, told TPM. “If they meet all that criteria then they add them to the list, take their name and addresses and anyone else who’s living there. And they ask, is anyone else living here a Canadian citizen 18 years of age or older? And if they are, then they take their names from them at the door. And that’s the way it worked in those days.” <<<<<
The Canadian Elector’s List that included both of Cruz’z parents existed to be disseminated by the Canadian postal system to the entirety of the voting precinct. It was the official Canadian system of notification that a voter was eligible. If one was eligible and was excluded from the voting roll, he would have time to petition the election official and have his name added after proof of citizenship, address, and age. At the time these lists were compiled, Canadians were emerging from a long period of voter exclusion for minorities, faiths, ethnicities, women, and younger voters. The officials had confirmed eligibility (citizenship and age) for all those on this list.
>>>>>According to phone books from 1971, 1972 and 1973, Cruz’s parents were the only individuals with the surname Cruz living in Calgary.
Johnson, the current Cruz strategist, pointed out in his statement to Breitbart that “the document itself does not purport to be a list of ‘registered Canadian voters.’”
“All this might conceivably establish is that this list of individuals (maybe) lived at the given addresses,” he added. “It says nothing about who was a citizen eligible to vote.”
But that appears to conflict with what the statute said, what the Canadian election official told TPM, and the document itself, which is a list of people identified as Canadian citizens who were eligible to vote in federal elections. <<<<<<<
Barry Soetoro Hussein Obama Doppelganger alert- Harvard Law, first time Senator, Wall Street funded globalist, sealed record duplicator II. He’s the white conservative Obama ‘16.
SSN 70-166881-9 is his Selective Service Number.
I'm sure Cruz has an explanation. Or if not he'll say something nasty about Trump instead of answering the question.
SSN = Selective Service Number
SSAN = Social Security Account Number
“Could Cruz honestly be given US citizenship because of his birth if both of his parents were Canadian citizens at the time?”
Under Canadian law the oath of allegiance required to become a Canadian citizen in 1970 was:
“I hereby renounce all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign sovereign or state of whom or which I may at this time be a subject or citizen.”
Under earlier United States law such a renouncing of U.S. citizenship could be used by the U.S. Government to find the person had indeed expatriated their U.S. citizenship. However, the lawyers and the U.S. Supreme Court saw fit to complicate and muddle the facts in Afroyim v. Rusk 1967(No. 456) 387 U.S. 253 by finding the 14th Amendment did not allow the cancellation of naturalized U.S. citizenship without certain formal affirmative steps being taken to do so before a State Department official. Consequently, even if Eleanor did renounce her U.S. citizenship to become a Canadian citizen, the U.S. Supreme court may find the precedent cases did not allow cancellation of citizenship or expatriation without further events taking place to formally affirm the expatriation. However, any inheritance of U.S. citizenship from a U.S. citizen mother could do no more than provide naturalized U.S. citizenship to a child born in Canada.
Does Mark Levin know about this? Is this why Rush hasn’t shown up lately? Is this why Glenn Stabby The Clown Beck has stopped threatening Mister Trump’s life? Enquirering minds want to know.
Yes, that’s right.
Mike Wilson, a brother to Ted Cruz who died as an infant.
Ted’s mom had a baby, in England, two years after she divorced first husband Wilson.
Ted’s mom went through the time and effort to submit US government documentation to register the infant death with US authorities.
Ted’s mom KNEW you had to register a foreign birth with the US government!!!!
Then, she moves to Canada. Now we are to believe Ted’s mom fell and hit her head, or somehow “forgot” to register Ted’s birth with the US government.
Ly’in Ted needs to show us his US citizenship bonafides, and the true date US extended naturalized citizenship status to Ted
Correct, Cruz is a naturalized citizen at best, since he is born on foreign soil.
If Eleanor had become a British citizen and used her British nationality to expedite Canadian citizenship, how would that affect her claim to American citizenship?
Would the Court be likely to uphold the claim of American citizenship where there has been the allegiance and citizenship to more than one distinct nationality.
you must have seen the photos of Raphael Cruz and Lee Harvey Oswald in New Orleans handing out pamphlets, no?
“It’s seems unlikely that someone could be on the Armed Services Committee without passing a thorough security check.”
That sentence would make Obama smirk.
What about George W. Bush? I mean you must be able to tie him to this somehow?
Causes of Citizenship Loss
U.S. citizens are subject to loss of citizenship if they perform certain acts voluntarily and with the intention to relinquish U.S. citizenship. These acts include:
1. Obtaining naturalization in a foreign state;
2. Taking an oath, affirmation or other formal declaration to a foreign state or its political subdivisions;
3. Entering or serving in the armed forces of a foreign state engaged in hostilities against the U.S. or serving as a commissioned or non-commissioned officer in the armed forces of a foreign state;
4. Accepting employment with a foreign government if (a) one has the nationality of that foreign state or (b) a declaration of allegiance is required in accepting the position;
5. Formally renouncing U.S. citizenship before a U.S. consular officer outside the United States;
6. Formally renouncing U.S. citizenship within the U.S. (but only “in time of war”);
7. Conviction for an act of treason.
This site is managed by the U.S. Department of State. External links to other Internet sites should not be construed as an endorsement of the views or privacy policies contained therein.
http://hamilton.usconsulate.gov/loss_of_citizenship.html
WOW! Now we are getting somewhere! A draft registration record proving that Rafael E. Cruz was at least a resident alien male in 1989, or at least thought he was. Now all we need to see is the paper the American Consulate in Calgary gave his mother when he was born, as required by US Immigration Law at the time, and we can put this one behind us.
Up until then, any foreign intelligence service that can penetrate Canadian or American Immigration records has total control of Rafael Edward (Ted) Cruz.
“are subject to loss”
Yes, and this is another instance where the U.S. Supreme Court has effectively nullified the enforcement of those laws in the aforementioned case law.
“Would the Court be likely to uphold the claim of American citizenship where there has been the allegiance and citizenship to more than one distinct nationality.”
Today, yes. After 1948 and before 1967, perhaps. Before 1934, certainly not.
Thanks for your reply. American citizenship has become more fluid the past century.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.