 "Tutti Frutti" (youtube song link) |
Posted on 04/08/2016 8:12:20 PM PDT by TroutStalker
CHICAGO — Federal prosecutors on Friday for the first time provided details of sexual abuse allegations against J. Dennis Hastert, the former speaker of the House, asserting that he molested at least four boys, as young as 14, when he worked as a high school wrestling coach decades ago.
Mr. Hastert, 74, is not charged with the incidents of abuse because of statutes of limitation, prosecutors said, but he was accused last year of illegally structuring bank withdrawals for money he was paying to one of his victims in an effort to hide the abuse. He pleaded guilty in October to the banking violation, and suffered a stroke in November while awaiting sentencing, now set for later this month.
According to a court filing by prosecutors late Friday laying out their sentencing considerations, Mr. Hastert, a popular coach in a small Illinois town in the 1960s, 1970s and 1980s, gave one boy a massage in the locker room, then performed an unspecified sex act on him. Another boy, Stephen Reinboldt, who died in 1995, was sexually abused by Mr. Hastert throughout high school in the late 1960s and early 1970s, his sister and others told the prosecutors. And prosecutors said Mr. Hastert had massaged another boy’s groin area after asking the boy to stay in his hotel room during a wrestling camp.
“Defendant used his position of trust as a teacher and coach to touch a child’s genitals and then undress and ask the child for a back massage in a motel room,” the prosecutors wrote of that incident. “There is no ambiguity; defendant sexually abused Individual A.”
Prosecutors said Mr. Hastert’s life had been “marred by stunning hypocrisy.”
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
I keep wondering what Kasich knows. He must have known something about Condit and Chandra. And the gossip back in the day was that Kasich, Condit, and Hastert were seen at sex parties in DC. And at the time, people pooh poohed it: no way would the Speaker of the House risk such things?! But now we’ve come to know what a sick perv he was. So what did Kasich know about Hastert? Anything criminal? Does he protect his cronies from justice in molestation and murder? Is he suitable for our presidency?
Hastert knew his own history, and he allowed himself to become speaker of the house representing one political party’s brand.
What if his molester history would have been exposed when he was speaker? Hastert couldn’t have known that wouldn’t happen....or could he?
I hope there’s a special place in hell for all these child abusers.
|
"Tutti Frutti" (youtube song link) |
..... Apparently .... our leaders are dwelling not only here .... but also within the netherworlds of the things that we most hopefully detest.
No, he was not just responsible for his actions. He was in a position where he knowingly was or could have been compromised by blackmail, etc. His actions had the potential of affecting millions.
Was that part of those conservative principles you’re talking about?
They pursue elected office because:
1. They like controlling people.
2. Their method all along has been to increase their status as an authority figure and then to make use of this.
3. They cynically think that they are even less likely to be caught by the establishment by becoming part of it.
They keep getting elected because:
They have lots of experience in manipulating people.
That is my understanding as well.
This kind of abuse is about control and power, not just sexual gratification. The same reasons someone is drawn to political power.
The two key questions in this Hastert affair are — Why is he being outed? Why at this point in time?
If you believe conspiracy theories suggesting most politicians are being extorted, the Hastert outing doesn’t make sense. There is an implicit bargain in extortion— if you do what I want, I will protect your secret. Denny was retired from his position of power. He served his masters while serving as Speaker. Out of office he was of no more use to them. Typically when the corrupt retire they are left alone. The bargain is — if you play ball in office you retire wealthy and we leave you alone.
Hamster has been outed. The only possible reason is to send a very strong message to some one or some people still playing the game that they can be destroyed. The message is particularly strong on many levels:
1). The implicit bargain with Denny was broken. He kept his end of the bargain and the puppet masters still destroyed him. This tells others complete obedience does not make them safe. Therefore they are vulnerable always, even if they do everything expected of them.
2). Hastert was third in line for the top job. His destruction seems to be a message to someone very high in the food chain.
3). Hastert was long out of office and was brought down by an administration of the opposite party. Historically when administrations change from one party to another the members of the previous regime are never prosecuted. There is a quid pro quo because members of the new administration know they will be out of power some day. Howerver in the current situation a Democrat administration, that is notorious for not prosecuting corruption, has destroyed a former House Speaker of another party years after he left office. This seems to be a message to every Republican on two levels. The first is we can get you anytime we want no matter who you are. The second message is we aren’t afraid of you doing anything to us if you take control of the White House in the next election.
With the Hastert prosecution the Obama administration has changed the Washington rule book. It is throwing out the long standing bargain that if you play ball you’ll be protected. It is also discarding the rule that says you don’t prosecute high ups of the other party when they are out of office. the Obama team is telling the Republicans it does not fear being prosecuted when out of office. This is the equivalent of Iran taking out a US carrier in the Persian Gulf knowing there will be no response. Obama is publicly telling Republicans they are completely impotent.
Consider also, now that he is outed and has been destroyed, why is Hastert remaining silent? What could he lose now except for his life?
But what do they have on Roberts? heard he and his wife adopted and Irish child thru south america because it was against Irish law to do it from the US
The whole sodomy movement is to make the Fabian Socialist Nero/muslim ethics of pederasty “Normal” again-—so Slavery is Freedom and Up is Down and Boys are Girls. The Lucifereans are “protected”-—they knew about this guy for decades-—Libido Dominandi-—and they controled him while in office (so he would sell out America). They expose him when he is useless to them and not needed......like they did with Bill Cosby and Justice Roberts. (Roberts is not exposed yet....because he has WORK to do-—to erase and destroy the Constitution of the US.)
All this “gender theory” promotion in schools is to indoctrinate and pervert and destroy Virtue formation (Christianity) in children and Common Sense/Logic/Reason.
In stead of real Wisdom in schools, they learn how to masturbate and be dependent and useful idiots. (Vice creates Slaves for the State). The Pride Days (to normalize the idea of anal sex in young children (same was “Deep Throat”)-—to normalize and glorify perversion in children to flip 2000 years of Ethics to the muslim, Luciferean (Ba’al Rites) and embed the proper (puerile) desires and attitudes in the children for the elite’s orgies on boats, in the White House (Franklin Cover-Up) and at the Bohemian Grove..
Just google “Sugar Keynes at Harvard” to glimpse the sodomite’s “worldview” and it is ALL about the pretty little boys like it was for Zeus. As Walid Shoebat stated, Saudis prefer boys for sexual recreation.....This is just like the Spartan and Samurai cultures where little boys were for sexual recreation—women were “breeders” only. Very sexist, brutal, evil cultures which could do the most vile things to little children and women.
Franklin Cover-Up was mainly about young boys from Boys Town in Nebraska-—a black “Larry King went to prison suppling a bunch of boys to the White House and other “judges”, politicians, lawyers, and elites. The CIA has been passing around boys—actually kidnapping boys delivering papers-—girls also, but mostly the boys-—just like with Hollywood moguls/producers.
I still remember when I first heard the name Hastert and saw his face, being proposed for Speaker.
Call it a visceral reaction, but I did not like him on the spot.
A disgusting newbie comment. Queers infiltrate every boys organization and this has nothing to do with politics.
If he were a dimocrat this is a resume enhancer.””
Exactly and that is one of the most glaring differences between the parties.
“Stone, the "keeper of the Nixon flame,"[13] was an adviser to the former President in his post-presidential years, serving as "Nixon's man in Washington."[14] Stone was a protégé of former Connecticut Governor John Davis Lodge, who introduced the young Stone to then former Vice President Nixon in 1967.[15]
,,,
In 1996, Stone resigned from a post as a volunteer spokesman in Senator Bob Dole’s campaign for president after The National Enquirer wrote that Stone had placed ads and pictures in racy swingers publications and a website seeking sexual partners for himself and his second wife, Nydia Bertrane Stone, whom he married in Las Vegas in the 1992. Stone initially denied the report.[10][11] On the Good Morning America program he said: “An exhaustive investigation now indicates that a domestic employee who I discharged for substance abuse on the second time that we learned that he had a drug problem is the perpetrator who had access to my home, access to my computer, access to my password, access to my postage meter, access to my post-office box key”.[10] In a 2008 interview with The New Yorker Stone admitted that the ads were authentic.[25]
...
Stone served as an advisor to the 2016 presidential campaign of Donald Trump.[45] He left the campaign on August 8, 2015.[46]
Yep.
Trump Cohn and Stone.
“Mr. Hastert, 74, is not charged with the incidents of abuse because of statutes of limitation”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.