Posted on 04/06/2016 4:27:17 PM PDT by drewh
Ted Cruz breathes a huge sigh of relief, for now. Sibley has another plan.
Chief Justixe Roberts made his decision late yesterday:
Sibley's application was directed to Chief Justice John Roberts, the justice assigned to emergency appeals from the Washington, D.C. area. Roberts denied it without seeking a response from any other party, a sign of how little merit Roberts found in the application.
Undeterrred, Sibley writes on his blog that he will now appeal to Clarence Thomas:
Yesterday, Chief Justice Roberts denied my Application to be relieved from the Restraining Order which prohibits me from releasing any of the D.C. Madam Jeane Palfrey's Escort Service Records.
Before I simply release the records in my possession, I must exhaust all judicial remedies. Accordingly, invoking Supreme Court Rule 22.4, I am renewing the Application with a second Justice, the estimable Clarence Thomas. I will wait to see what he says before taking my next step.
Anyway, it’s not like Sibley’s gonna let a little thing like the law get in his way, especially since he’s already lost his license to practice. He's biding his time to see what Clarence Thomas thinks (let's hope his name isn't implicated), before releasing the names himself. That's the end game here. Also, Mr. Sibley would like us to focus on Judge Garland.
Below is Sibley's complete response to CLG.
***
By Montgomery Blair Sibley
As you asked me to keep you in the loop, here is the latest on the D.C. Madam's records:
Yesterday, Chief Justice Roberts denied my Application to remove the Restraining Order which prohibits me from releasing the D.C. Madam's Escort Service Records I believe relevant to the Presidential Election. Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 22, I am now renewing that Application to Justice Thomas - a procedural second bite at the apple so to speak. I will wait upon his decision - which in the normal course should come by the middle of next week - beforetaking any further action regarding those Records. The Renewed Application can be found on my blog.
I have reviewed the putative D.C. Madam records released on-line and can state they are not the Records I seek to release. Instead, they appear to be those that I released publicly in 2007... [See also: CLG's 'DC Madam' Phone Records posted September 2007.]
Respectfully, I have sought to answer all your questions, so now I am going to ask you a few of my own: With the Wisconsin Primary now in the books and more primaries on the horizon:
1. Will the Press begin to "press" Chief Justice Roberts as to why he denied my Application in Supreme Court Case No. 15A1016? Is he a Caesar at the Coliseum turning his thumb up or down as the whim strikes him or does he have to account-through-legal-analysis for his decision to allow my First Amendment Political Speech to be muzzled by explicitly approving the refusal of the lower courts in his administrative jurisdiction to allow me to file my Motion to Modify the Restraining Order? (I trust you know for time sensitive or urgent questions, reporters can contact the Supreme Court Public Information Office at 202-479-3211, press 1.)
2. When will the Press begin to "press" D.C. Circuit Court Chief Judge Garland as to why his Court has refused – since March 9, 2016 – to address my Petition which seeks an order directing the District Court Clerk to file my Motion to Modify the Restraining Order. Notably, in Case No.: 16-3007, I requested Expedited Consideration which the Circuit Court also has refused to grant or deny creating in effect a judicial pocket veto without explanation and thus denying me the ability to appeal such a decision. (Such an inquiry can be directed to: Tracy Hauser Scarrow, (202-216-7460) Special Assistant to Chief Judge Garland.)
Background reading:
BAD NEWS FOR LYIN' TED: Supreme Court Adds DC Madam Case To Official Docket
If there was something damning, he would have.
BEFORE the so important Wisconsin primary.
The Enquirer, this guy, the Wa Post, someone would have let any tangible evidence out before Wisconsin.
The Daily Bail? is that an online news site?
:) Best, most concise rebuttal to this nonsense that I've seen, yet!
Uh huh! Roberts' name is in there, bet the farm on it! One of the (many) reasons he rewrote Obamacare!
Sibley's application was directed to Chief Justice John Roberts,...Roberts denied it without seeking a response from any other party,...
Uh huh! Roberts' name is in there, bet the farm on it! One of the (many) reasons he rewrote Obamacare!
Thanks again Pookie for the link proving this is just lies.
MYTH DEBUNKED: Ted Cruz is NOT on a D.C Madam’s List, You Have Been LIED TO!
http://dcgazette.com/2016/myth-debinked-sorry-liberals-ted-cruz-not-d-c-madams-list-lied/
>>Yea Ted. Hide all those papers!
Campaign's whose consultants live in glass houses shouldn't throw.....
"In 1996, Stone resigned from a post as a volunteer spokesman in Senator Bob Dole's campaign for president after The National Enquirer wrote that Stone had placed ads and pictures in racy swingers publications and a website seeking sexual partners for himself and his second wife, Nydia Bertrane Stone,"
So the heir of the Drumpf brothel empire was introduced to [Nixon's dirty trixter] Stone by Cohn? WoW
http://www.google.com/#q=Trump+Cohn+Stone
Kinda puts that whole "cozying up to the establishment" meme in a whole new putrid light, don't it.
Yes. Ted is one of the sleaziest politicians I’ve seen in fifty years.
Thanks for reminding me.
http://www.google.com/#q=Cohn+Stone+Trump+Epstein
Quit the collection of insiders for someone pretending to be an outsider.
And yet, Trump’s mortgage bidness still failed...
Sure would be unfortunate if the list got hacked.
Imagine SCOTUS judges, candidates, Senators etc on there.
The powers at be would never want those names released.
Oh yeah, and that signature loan for Goldman Sachs...
You’re a load of information today.
Too bad it smacks your idiot in the face!
>>that signature loan for Goldman Sachs...
Asked and answered.
http://www.npr.org/2016/01/14/463093708/the-ted-cruz-goldman-sachs-loan-explained
Now, why did Trump’s Mortgage bidness FAIL; did someone not review his SBA application with sufficient vigor, or something?
You poor dear.
I’ll bet you can walk into Goldman Sachs any time you like and get a $100k signature loan.
You dumb asses don’t have a clue do you.
>>I’ll bet you can walk into Goldman Sachs any time you like and get a $100k signature loan.
Wells Fargo gave me a 14000 credit card limit I didn’t even ask for (that I cancelled and never used) - and I’m just a “dumbass”.
I don’t see any reason why Goldman Sachs wouldn’t give Cruz a loan - there’s no evidence he’s a credit risk.
How much did Trump Mortage figure on loaning.. before it FAILED?
Yes, you’re a dumb ass.
Any other questions?
Oh by the way, would you folks support Trump more if his wife worked for the Council on Foreign Relations for five years?
How’s that North American Community coming anyway?
Has Heidi expressed her pleasure at how smoothly the slide into the North American Union is coming?
Gosh you guys have a pandora’s box of problems.
Curz can’t stop putting his feet in his mouth, and he has to have some of the most ignorant forum participants I’ve seen in 30 years.
{shrug}
It’s not like those lists of phone numbers aren’t already all over them inerweb thingees alGore invented.
That must be very exciting for whoever happens to be on the end of those numbers... assuming they’re still breathing.
>>Has Heidi expressed her pleasure at how
>>smoothly the slide into the North American Union is coming?
Why would she - What was her work-product in the CFR/NAFTA conspiracy?
One more subject you don’t know squat about.
She participated in the development of a document called “Developing a North American Community”.
As I said, not in 30 years have I seen more illiterate big-mouths on a forum.
Ok great.
What text in that document is she specifically responsible for?
Also, if there one person in that book who never sought or partook in the illicit activity, then the book itself cannot be trusted, and publication of such would ruin an innocent life, thereby validating the concern for public good.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.