Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Putting women on the front line is dangerous PC meddling. We will pay for it in blood
The Telegraph ^ | April 5, 2016 | Colonel Richard Kemp

Posted on 04/06/2016 4:31:06 AM PDT by huldah1776

The Ministry of Defence admits it is reviewing military physical fitness standards in preparation for the expected announcement later this year that women will be allowed to serve in all front-line combat units, including the infantry and SAS.

The MoD denies that standards will be reduced, but of course that is precisely what is going to happen. Generals – having put up a fight for many years – have been told women will join front-line units and, like the good soldiers they are, intend to make it work.

The people who have demanded this change – politicians desperate to be seen as “progressive”, feminist zealots and ideologues hell-bent on equality of opportunity without exception – would never dream of volunteering. Indeed only a very small number of women will want to join the infantry and of those only a fraction will have the physical capability. Hence the need to lower the bar.

This is an extremely dangerous move. Physical fitness is the single most important building block for an infantry soldier. Everything else depends on it. The only people who fully understand the demands of infantry close combat are infantrymen themselves. I have not heard a single serving or retired infantryman say that admitting women is the right thing to do – unless their wives or senior officers are listening. The overwhelming majority are vehemently opposed and many have said that if women join they will leave.

Why do feelings run so high? Because every infantryman knows that the price for this social engineering experiment will be paid in blood

(Excerpt) Read more at telegraph.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; United Kingdom; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: deployment; dod; feminism; military; standards
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last
To: huldah1776

Liberals don’t because it won’t be their blood.


21 posted on 04/06/2016 5:40:08 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Liberals are the Taliban of America, trying to tear down any symbol that they don't like.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brooklyn Attitude

What you say is true.

And it is also true the Left will be the next ones eliminated by their new masters, after their usefulness has been exhausted.


22 posted on 04/06/2016 5:53:54 AM PDT by exit82 ("The Taliban is on the inside of the building" E. Nordstrom 10-10-12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: gusty

Great background, gusty.

I would add another reason—Israeli men were killed trying to rescue captured Israeli women, who were being tortured. They heard the screams and could not overcome their urge to rescue the woman, and thus were picked off as they tried to go help.

This is the instinct that makes us men.

I am sick of the PC garbage being promulgated in my name, that is compromising the effectiveness and the moral fiber of the greatest military force ever seen in history.


23 posted on 04/06/2016 5:56:52 AM PDT by exit82 ("The Taliban is on the inside of the building" E. Nordstrom 10-10-12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: huldah1776

We’ll pay in more ways than one and then some.


24 posted on 04/06/2016 5:58:04 AM PDT by SandRat (Duty - Honor - Country! What else needs said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 48th SPS Crusader

Don’t be dumb - you know what I mean.


25 posted on 04/06/2016 6:00:27 AM PDT by Roman_War_Criminal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: IrishBrigade

Your analogy makes more sense actually and yes, the revisionists would have us believe that Angelina Jolie can best Arnold Schwarzenegger.

Retarded to the highest degree!


26 posted on 04/06/2016 6:02:24 AM PDT by Roman_War_Criminal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: 48th SPS Crusader
Exactly where are the “front lines” in the war with Islam?

The front lines are with the combat units engaging combat units of the enemy. The things you described are essentially attacks on our rear areas.

Not really complicated.

27 posted on 04/06/2016 6:08:46 AM PDT by Bruce Campbells Chin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

... this generation of our children is growing up as the cannon fodder of tomorrow. They are largely unprepared and incapable of surviving outside their consumer and pleasure bubble. This is a generation that is prepared to approve any capitulation unconditionally the minute any blowhard with a weapon in hand jumps off the TV or computer screen into real life.

***************************************************

I was talking to someone about this just the other day - what would today’s generation do if suddenly they had no ‘gadgets’, food was something they had to produce or starve, the essentials weren’t something you could go out and buy. It wasn’t an optimistic conversation because we didn’t think most would survive. If that ‘armed someone’ offered food, water & shelter, I think many would say “ok”.


28 posted on 04/06/2016 6:09:55 AM PDT by Qiviut (In Islam you have to die for Allah. The God I worship died for me. [Franklin Graham])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: econjack

Where are all the feminists on this? This should be right up thir alley. Women with bulldyke haircuts buffed up to look like men carrying M4’s to shoot male enemy combatants. Why not just give the women steroids and penis implants while they’re t it?.../s


29 posted on 04/06/2016 6:22:54 AM PDT by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: IrishBrigade
> if women in combat were such a great idea, wouldn’t history have told us that...?

The leftists will chime in about the Amazon Warriors I'm sure but that's about all they got...

30 posted on 04/06/2016 6:25:48 AM PDT by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: huldah1776

How can they still not realize that the next war is going to be fought in their driveway?

There will be no safe place for women, soldiers or not.


31 posted on 04/06/2016 6:31:57 AM PDT by The Toll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Qiviut
Life without gadgets will be quite a shock.

(Link to the full-length Free Republic thread)

32 posted on 04/06/2016 6:44:49 AM PDT by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: exit82

“And it is also true the Left will be the next ones eliminated by their new masters, after their usefulness has been exhausted.”

Yes, but not before they preside over the kangaroo trials and sentencing of those declared to be enemies of the revolution. Anyone who is or has ever been a registered Republican will be first in line.


33 posted on 04/06/2016 7:07:11 AM PDT by Brooklyn Attitude (It's the apocalypse, lets have some fun!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Roman_War_Criminal
I'm mnot sure of the context of this picture but here it is.


34 posted on 04/06/2016 7:08:49 AM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: huldah1776

Women in battle? Is there a war in the kitchen?


35 posted on 04/06/2016 7:13:59 AM PDT by dware (Contested convention = final nail in the GOP coffin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jsanders2001

“The leftists will chime in about the Amazon Warriors I’m sure but that’s about all they got...”

Despite what is commonly portrayed in movies and on TV, most women cannot defeat men in hand to hand combat, even with training. I once watched 2 police women try to handcuff a scrawny 16 YO boy. Each grabbed an arm and tried to force it behind his back. He simply did not allow them to do it. After watching this for a while, a male cop walked over grabbed the kids arms and handcuffed him. It was very eye opening.


36 posted on 04/06/2016 7:21:15 AM PDT by Brooklyn Attitude (It's the apocalypse, lets have some fun!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: PIF

“Thus with no troops to send, the generals will either be forced to fight themselves or more likely quickly surrender and avoid the predicted bloodbath.”

That has been the idea from the beginning - to make the US military so combat-ineffective that it cannot win a long campaign. The choice will be to either go nuclear or quit.


37 posted on 04/06/2016 8:14:54 AM PDT by PLMerite (Compromise is Surrender: The Revolution...will not be kind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: huldah1776

And our souls.


38 posted on 04/06/2016 8:15:17 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ruy Dias de Bivar

“I’m not sure of the context of this picture but here it is.”

Probably some proto-feminazis playing dress up, safe in the knowledge that they won’t actually have to fight.

Or hookers getting ready to service the officers.


39 posted on 04/06/2016 8:18:57 AM PDT by PLMerite (Compromise is Surrender: The Revolution...will not be kind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: PLMerite

See how satire conceals the truth within?


40 posted on 04/06/2016 8:26:50 AM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson