Posted on 03/28/2016 9:27:05 AM PDT by RoosterRedux
Let me begin with this. If the National Enquirer wrote a story about me cheating on my wife with five women, I had better be extremely definitive in my response; because if Im not, my wife smelling the guilt would kick my ass. OK, let me also tell you that I wouldnt be angry; in fact, Id be ecstatic. Its fun to count money from guaranteed punitive and compensatory damages in a multimillion dollar lawsuit.
But thats me. I cant speak for Senator Ted Cruz except to say that so far his reaction seems well, not exactly definitive. He calls it garbage and false, not exactly a denial. Then he plays the victim, calling it an attack on his family; offensive to Heidi and me, theyre offensive to our daughters, he writes.
Actually, its not an offense aimed at your wife or your daughters; its aimed at you, Senator. Then, theres the attack on Donald Trump.
(Excerpt) Read more at latino.foxnews.com ...
Boo!
[[This is what passes for news now on FR?]]
Unfortunately yes- We’ve becoem the National Enquirer- ‘reporting’ on any and all unsubstantiated inuendo, and presenting opinion as fact-
another link from CTH
Truth is an absolute defense.
Also...I haven’t been able to access the actual story online. BUT...over the years I have read a few Enquirer stories, and they are always “true”.
Why ?
Well, because they word them artfully. They say things like, “it is reported or rumored that”. OR “someone says that”...and that is undoubtedly true.
Some people ARE saying this about Cruz. They are only reporting that people are saying this....not that the “this” is true.
That’s how they get away with doing what they do.
FWIW, I believe the underlying story is true. But my reading experience of the NE is that they don’t directly report on the underlying story, but just that stuff is being said.....
Noooooo Sanchez was fired for making up stuff....from CNN...then there is the radio stations in S Florida. He is a turd.
We have a dozen plus threads on this. Here is some of Amanda Carpenters twitter feed that Free Republican members saved before she deleted them. Plus, a few more good photos.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3414519/posts?page=118#118 share cheesecake with him at 3AM 4/2/15
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3413970/posts?page=135#135 his/her churchill tattoos 4/1/14
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3414247/posts?page=142#142 married men are cool 11/9/14
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3414247/posts?page=179#179 daddy cruz is coming 12/22/15
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3414267/posts?page=13#13 having good time, tats & fun 5AM 11AM 4/1/14
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3414267/posts?page=71#71 Mile high stealyourwoman? 6/14
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3414312/posts?page=14#14 multi-tweet multi date collage
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3414312/posts?page=27#27 sleep w/boss & frigid wives DC women 2/16/14
And:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3413620/posts?page=18#18 Breitbart sits on scandal 2/2/16
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3414444/posts?page=1#1
CIA deception experts on Ted 3/16
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3414598/posts?page=10#10 TC creepy stage kiss
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3414519/posts?page=135#135 Bernie hearts BBW
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3413953/posts?page=42#42 dirty teddy
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3413953/posts?page=64#64 the DC honeypot
If the last half of the statement has been proven a lie (it is a smear that has come from Donald Trump and his henchmen) why would I or anyone believe the first half of the statement is the truth?
If you are a FReeper or a conservative then you don’t use a liberal website or a liberal to attack another conservative. Do you understand the cognitive dissonance displayed when you do this?
Doing so only steers you away from being a conservative and reinforces a behavior and attitude that we on FR want to avoid. We are facts based here and do not take refuge in ad hominems or other logical fallacies.
I started out supporting Cruz, but, when I got a closer look I noticed he's a kind of an unctuous fellow...and he's just not a likeable or trustworthy guy.
And boy, oh, boy does he lie.
I support Trump because I am a businessman and he's a businessman. And I like the fact that he's an outsider.
Hey Drudge, when are you going to start covering this story?
After the second National Enquirer follow-up?
After the fifth?
Ted Cruz, you have to know that the Enquirer story thus far is the tip of the iceberg with 80 percent yet to come videos, more photos, quotes from women coming forth.
Heidi, you might want to get to the bottom of this and demand your husband sue the National Enquirer, otherwise tell him it’s all over for his Presidency.
It’s going to get REALLY UGLY going forward, no matter what.
If you honestly believe that Trump isn’t choreographing this from behind the scenes I have some wonderful Florida beachfront property I’d love to sell you sight unseen.
You see how that works?
IMHO, DRUDGE is letting this play out on its own. DRUDGE knows the rumors and the origins peddling them to media.
Does anyone think DRUDGE was left out?
DRUDGE apparently supports the frontrunner, at minimum DRUDGE covers the frontrunner fairly.
Cruz is dealing with a little vetting, finally. The rumors have been there. Ted would like to blame them on TRUMP. It isn’t working, because the rumors are old and Cruz has lots of enemies who are inclined to use them.
Once again, TRUMP and now DRUDGE let the other parties do the leg work on this scandal rumor, and foot the bill to it’s conclusion.
TRUMP enjoys watching the OPPO RESEARCH operation on Cruzader kick in gear. At NO EXPENSE to TRUMP.
FREE Cruz OPPO. Again.
It’s splendid. It’s well deserved and sooo overdue.
Except of course, Trump had nothing to do with it... and he started a feud with Trump over their wives intentionally just so he could deliver that line and try to create obfuscation.
At this point Cruz has zero credibility.... watching him self destruct in slow motion is depressing.
Actually, if you really pay attention, Trump lies more than Cruz.....he’s just better at it.
Yet Drudge has a story with 1,000 shares of Bill Clinton doing cocaine on a woman's coffee table in 1983.
Uh...Breitbart is your example of an un-biased source?
Come on now, Forest. (And that’s all I have to say about that!)
His blaming of Trump is a demonstrable lie.
So then, since Trump falsely accuses Cruz of using the picture of Melania, why should I believe anything that Trump says?
Cruz didn’t start a feud with anybody. A PAC did.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.