Posted on 01/24/2016 9:07:04 AM PST by John W
The FBI is investigating whether members of Hillary Clinton's inner circle "cut and pasted" material from the government's classified network so that it could be sent to her private e-mail address, former State Department security officials say.
Clinton and her top aides had access to a Pentagon-run classified network that goes up to the Secret level, as well as a separate system used for Top Secret communications.
Somehow, highly classified information from SIPRNet, as well as even the super-secure JWICS, jumped from those closed systems to the open system and turned up in at least 1,340 of Clinton's home e-mails - including several the CIA earlier this month flagged as containing ultra-secret Sensitive Compartmented Information and Special Access Programs, a subset of SCI.
SAP includes "dark projects," such as drone operations, while SCI protects intelligence sources and methods.
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
There is a story all over the facebooks that HilLIARy and Bill were selling Uranium mining rights to Russia, at the location of the ranch in Oregon where the protester have taken over a federal building...
Does anyone know anything about this?
I trust Free Republic for actual news, FB much less
Call it what it is.. Espionage..
He taped himself too. No doubt it’s an unwritten rule in Washington followed by both parties never to follow his lead.
And this isn’t about breaking into the opponent’s political headquarters, but national security.
Her flagrant law-breaking and above-the-rules self ran a government agency with many career employees, instead of mostly political hacks as she was used to, and that was involved with national security.
“We were dead broke when we left the White House” might be the kind of pulling the wool over the public’s eyes that the media will try to ignore and spin away, but wiped the server “with a cloth?” is another matter. It’s not “what DIFFERENCE at this point DOES IT MAKE?!”
From what I’ve seen overall between the liberal media and the liberal base, this is considered potentially serious. It was the very reason why many Dems tried “drafing” Biden and they even to float the idea of him getting into the race.
The secular humanist press is powerful but not omnipotent, and if they think it’s in their best interests, or that they can’t avoid doing so, they will throw her to their own wolves.
Wrong. Comey is a life long civil servant. In other words another government leech living off a taxpayer funded salary. He won’t dare jeapordize his pension by speaking out.
I will continue to believe that the Klitons are untouchable until somebody actually touches them.
I think the reality is it’s worse than Snowden. This involves super classified info that I do not think he was able to access.
btt
Or to put it another way:
As much as they’d maybe like to keep all negative information about their people from the public, sometimes they have no choice but to, and sometimes they may even want to.
The Clintons have been known to try to intimidate the press.
In a book I’m planning to read soon, which looks very informative, called “Tag-teaming the Media,” the author says that he had a great amount of trouble getting journalists to speak to him about the Clintons. It was much easier to get them to talk about covering Bush.
And then, so far, for whatever reason, the media have been willing or been forced to publicize some negative information on the Clintons, including about Bill’s sexual crimes and quite a lot about Hillary’s emails.
They will not push for the political downfall of the Clintons but it seems like they could be pushed into bringing it about, if too many facts go against her.
That’s your choice.
Maybe they were using drones for the Chelsea wedding photos. Maybe the top secret was only for Hillary in her yoga class garb. Right?
The fiction is that Berger did it on his own initiative, that higher-ups didn't know and wouldn't have approved. Bullsh*t I know, but it worked. Will it work again?
I think Benghazi was attacked BECAUSE Hillary’s private server had been compromised/hacked beforehand and they saw Ambassador Stevens’ pleas to Hillary for security.
Wow. Interesting take.
I have no doubt it’s worse, but Edward Snowden is no Kliton.
wailing and gnashing of teeth by the dems and MSM if this were a republican. . .the republican would have dropped out long ago.
Yes. There would be NO WAY a republican would be supported by ANYONE even his “cronies,” if he were as dirty as THIS.
Most people behind bars are not this dirty.
I think the reality is it’s worse than Snowden. This involves super classified info that I do not think he was able to access.
Anyone with a dead man switch becomes absolute top priority for takedown. It can be done, and usually involves termination of the one holding it; just a matter of predicting and containing the damage and/or disabling the device.
In Hillary’s case, ensure that anyone contracted to release the info knows tat doing so will cost them far more than whatever they would benefit.
Because we live in a Banana Republic country. What is there that comes out of D.C. that isn't totally corrupt.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.