Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hillary Clinton's E-Mail Scandal Worse Than We Knew: Will the Democratic Frontrunner Be Indicted?
Townhall.com ^ | January 22, 2016 | Mark Meckler

Posted on 01/22/2016 3:45:40 PM PST by Kaslin

In movies, documents have a large, red stamp at the top: Classified. The stamped documents - which have been replaced by e-mails, phones, or thumb drives - have to be protected from the bad guys at all costs. Too bad Hillary Clinton doesn't understand what every American moviegoer over age five knows instinctively.

The Intelligence Community's inspector general Charles McCullough III recently reported that at "least several dozen of the emails sent and received by Hillary Clinton while she was secretary of state contained classified material, including intelligence material classified at the highest levels."

The e-mails varied in their levels of classification: "classified," "secret," "top secret/SAP" (or "special access program”) which includes the highest and most protected national security information.

This is big news.

Clinton has always maintained that none of the emails she sent or received were marked classified. But, as David French wrote, "every single federal employee who handles classified information — from the secretary of state to administrative assistants and Army sergeants — is required to protect both 'marked and unmarked' classified information." Classified information made its way into these "unmarked emails" which could’ve been intercepted by foreign intelligence agencies since she sent them from her private, unsecured server on a private, unsecured smartphone.

Even though Sen. Bernie Sanders said that Americans were "sick and tired" of hearing about her "damn emails," this issue will not go away.

Not for lack of trying.

Charles Cooke described her comical dishonesty on display at her press conference. He wrote,

"As is now clear, Hillary possesses almost none of Bill's remarkable personal virtues. She's not warm or spontaneous or alluring or quick. She has no discernible political instincts. She doesn't even seem to enjoy the human contact on which successful public servants thrive. But boy can she fib with the best of them. From start to precipitous finish, her performance was pure Clintonian evasion. 'What I did,' she argued carefully — after trying a quick ‘nothing to do with me' for good measure — 'was legally permitted, number one, first and foremost, okay?' 'Number two,' she offered, 'they've already concluded more than 1,200 of the e-mails I gave them have nothing to do with the work, and I said make them public.' 'I know,' she concluded emphatically, that 'there's a certain level of, you know, sort of anxiety or interest in this, but the facts are the facts.'"

Move along. There's nothing to see here.

But then, the Washington Beacon published a non-disclosure agreement that Hillary Clinton signed back in 2009 the day after she took the position of Secretary of State which shows she knew "negligent handling" of classified data could cause her to face criminal penalties. The document which she signed read:

"I have been advised that the unauthorized disclosure, unauthorized retention, or negligent handling of SCI by me could cause irreparable injury to the United States or be used to advantage by a foreign nation. I have been advised that any unauthorized disclosure of SCI by me may constitute violations of United States criminal laws… nothing in the agreement constitutes a waiver by the United States of the right to prosecute me for any statutory violation."

In other words, this is concrete proof that she knew what her actions were illegal. But, we didn't need proof.

If the Secretary of State didn't know what the basic law was regarding national security, it doesn't bid well for her competency as President. Not that she'll necessarily make it to the Oval Office. This Democratic front-runner is facing an ever expanding FBI investigation, which will invariably heat up with these new revelations. She could even be indicted before any votes are cast.

In the movies, the secret documents are stolen, but the good guys eventually show up before too much damage is done. But in real life, the "good guys" sometimes act like "bad guys."

Let's hope that truth and justice will be re-established before the lights go down on this nation.


TOPICS: Canada; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Russia; US: Arkansas; US: New York; US: South Carolina; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 2016election; arkansas; benghazi; blackberry; canada; classified; clintoncash; clintonfoundation; election2016; emailscandal; hillary; hillaryclinton; hitlery; humaabedin; iran; libya; markmeckler; newyork; pages; peterschweizer; russia; southcarolina; treygowdy; uranium; waronterror; wipewater
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-102 next last
To: Kaslin

If all of the following are true, Obama will not let Hillary be indicted:

* Hillary has FBI files and other sources, regarding Obama
* Obama has done illegal and/or embarrassing things
* Hillary is evil enough to threaten Obama

Thus, Obama will not let Hillary be indicted.

The question is: what will the FBI do about that, and when?


61 posted on 01/22/2016 4:43:06 PM PST by ReaganGeneration2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueunicorn6

Hillary is getting old and she is sick and she doesn't have near the power the Clintons used to have.

Her lifetime of arrogance and corruption and nastiness have left her with no friends and lots of enemies.

She is a toothless and clawless old cat who is growling and arching her back to try and scare people.

You just grab her by the nape of her neck and throw her out the door.

Excellent analogy!

62 posted on 01/22/2016 4:44:19 PM PST by MV=PY (The Magic Question: Who's paying for it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: CGASMIA68

I predict she will drop out soon citing health issues.


63 posted on 01/22/2016 4:44:54 PM PST by Disestablishmentarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: ReaganGeneration2

If all of the following are true, Obama will not let Hillary be indicted:

* Hillary has FBI files and other sources, regarding Obama
* Obama has done illegal and/or embarrassing things
* Hillary is evil enough to threaten Obama

Thus, Obama will not let Hillary be indicted.

The question is: what will the FBI do about that, and when?
>>>>>>>>>

We have the winner!!


64 posted on 01/22/2016 4:49:34 PM PST by laplata ( Liberals/Progressives have diseased minds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Nevadan
“If [HRC] performed her job responsibilities using
her personal server, then how could she do her job if she couldn�€™t receive and send classified mail through her personal server?” Good question, and exactly what the press should be asking her.
65 posted on 01/22/2016 4:53:55 PM PST by utahagen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

66 posted on 01/22/2016 4:54:39 PM PST by doug from upland (Some of you keep telling yourself -- Romney would have been as bad or worse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Don Corleone
Clinton has always maintained that none of the emails she sent or received were marked classified

According to Hillary, none of her 'emails' had any classification markings on them at all, because her 'staff' would intercept her emails, transcribe the body of the text onto a piece of paper, and give that to her.

The old 'plausible deniability' excuse.

67 posted on 01/22/2016 4:54:48 PM PST by UCANSEE2 (Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2

Bill & Hill multiple time winners at the national word parsing championships.


68 posted on 01/22/2016 4:55:56 PM PST by nascarnation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Please do no tindict her until October.


69 posted on 01/22/2016 4:57:39 PM PST by amnestynone (We are asked by people who do not tolerate us to tolerate the intolerable in the name of tolerance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LucyT

Bump


70 posted on 01/22/2016 5:02:35 PM PST by Jet Jaguar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Cen-Tejas

If shillary and cabal go down hard, I’d wager a bit that the obamoa crew will also. They have to have large “files” of dirt on each other.
Mutual assured destruction


71 posted on 01/22/2016 5:16:47 PM PST by BigpapaBo (If it don't kill you it'll make you _________!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: BigpapaBo

72 posted on 01/22/2016 5:22:09 PM PST by GraceG (The election doesn't pick the next president, it is an audition for "American Emperor"...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: ReaganGeneration2
Thus, Obama will not let Hillary be indicted. The question is: what will the FBI do about that, and when?

Fine, if they do nothing, then let Trump, his FBI director and Mark Levin as Attorney General indict her! Now wouldn't That be something. . almost popcorn time already.

73 posted on 01/22/2016 5:25:27 PM PST by Art in Idaho (Conservatism is the only Hope for Western Civilization.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: CGASMIA68

Yes, alas, the American people never get enough of Mr. Bill and now Mrs. Bill, who they think will rule like Mr. Bill and return their “good economy”.


74 posted on 01/22/2016 5:25:51 PM PST by Theodore R. (Liberals keep winning; so the American people must now be all-liberal all the time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: MV=PY

Sounds like a lot of wishful thinking on your part; hopefully you are on to something.


75 posted on 01/22/2016 5:28:14 PM PST by Theodore R. (Liberals keep winning; so the American people must now be all-liberal all the time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
"Sounds like a lot of wishful thinking on your part; hopefully you are on to something."

Ok, I'm an optimist. Why not? We're still living in the best place at the best time in the history of mankind. ;-)

76 posted on 01/22/2016 5:32:32 PM PST by MV=PY (The Magic Question: Who's paying for it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer
Can't give e-mails up, snow. Next excuse, rain. Third will be hot humid summer, ink ran.

"The dog ate my emails!"

77 posted on 01/22/2016 5:32:51 PM PST by Tonytitan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Tonytitan
Here is the deal

Hillary will delay until she has enough delegates to beat Bernie

FBI announces they want DOJ to indict

They don't because she quits and gives her delegates to Joe Biden and only then can the DNC control the Democratic nomination

78 posted on 01/22/2016 5:36:44 PM PST by scooby321
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: scooby321

What difference does it make if she’s indicted or not?

oBLOOMER will simply wet his panties and pardon her on his way out :(


79 posted on 01/22/2016 5:58:09 PM PST by PrairieLady2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I hope she doesn’t get indicted before Cruz and/or Trump demolish her in her bid for CIC.

Then indict the bitch. There is nothing I would rather see than her in a size XXXL orange jumpsuit doing the perp-walk on her way to prison.


80 posted on 01/22/2016 5:58:31 PM PST by panaxanax ( Cruz/West 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-102 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson