Posted on 01/14/2016 2:29:12 PM PST by detective
In what may be one of the most bizarre political moments to spring out of Nikki Haleys widely-criticized State of the Union response, Haley declared that donor-class presidential favorite Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) "believes in amnesty," before she flipped 180 degrees to adopt the Rubio campaign talking point that he is "not for amnesty." Haley- who informed reporters that she is in personal contact and even texts Sen. Rubio- said that the Republican presidential hopeful was "supportive" of her speech condemning GOP frontrunner Donald Trump and "appreciated" what she was doing. Haley's retraction of her damning statement about Rubio's support for amnesty came within four hours of her original declaration.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
she may be ‘open to running for the position of VP but apparently she doesn’t realize no one wants a nut as their VP
That’s Nikki Haley? I thought it was Elaine Benes.
I love how politicians do not think we can speak Spanish.
She was right at 3:00pm. Wrong at 7:00pm.
She must have gotten a call from Reince Prebus sometime around 4:00 or 5:00
Born January 20, 1972 in Bamberg, SC. (Jus Soli.)
Father was Dr. Ajit Singh Randhawa, born 1933 in Amritsar Punjab, India.
Naturalized as a US Citizen 18 Oct 1977.
Father was NOT a US Citizen at the time of birth of Nikki
.
She is NOT a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN so is not eligible for a VP spot.
Mother was Raj Kaur Randhawa, born in India. Unable as yet to find US Naturalization.
“Nikki is for Amnesty in Spanish, but against it in English. She just forgot to change languages. ;-)”
Hilarious. Absolutely hilarious. And it sums it up this debacle.
If she is a Sikh her last name should be Kaur.
-Haley- who informed reporters that she is in personal contact and even texts Sen. Rubio-
mmmmmm
I guess they might be very close friends ?
But she's done a good job of clearing up any confusion the voters had about her.
Nicky Haley is the Republican’s Ambassador Susan Rice: the party’s designated pinch liar.
Senator Joni Ernest?
I remember she was going to be all that. Huge upset for me as well. Not in that state. Watched her rise. True colors coming out for many these days.
There certainly aren't many in the public eye. I'd think Sara Palin.
That's my point. Judging from the regular female posters on FR, there are conservative women who aren't at all represented by these women who get elected to high office. Many campaign as conservatives, but sell out once they're in office. It's baffling.
Phyllis Schlafly
Lost in all of this is the real reason why they chose to pick out the Confederate Battle flag rather than what that nut job used asman excuse to murder those poor souls at that church.
WHY THE REGIME PICKED ON THE CONFEDERATE BATTLE FLAG
AND NOT ROOF’S MANIFESTO
Because it was under threat of questioning and possible impeachment proceedings by its so called political opposition the regime needed to defer or stop any movement toward this. It was necessary to use a political device usually atrributed to Saul Alinsky but used by the nazi and commies like Stalin with the Kulacks through racial division.
Through the use of The Bully Pulpit It created persons engaged in felonious assults on authority who were black youths into; Victims of an evil society (thus approving their actions) out of whole cloth.
The regime began with the Zimmerman case which resulted in a series of assults by black youths on completely innocent whites,hispanics, and asians who were either targeted or wandered near or through black gang infested areas. The perpetators excuse; The reported ?cold blood killing of Treyvon Martin because he was black
It led to a score or more deaths and serious injuries which were treated as local news ignored and forgotten. And it was met with silence while this was happening. Neither the locqatious POTUS or his political opposition uttered as much as a; Now!,Now! or a tsk!,tsk!.
Those killings were referenced by the Charleston Church massacre perpetrator in his crazed manifesto.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3302529/posts
Naturally when it was discovered that mention of those score of murders were used in this nut cases’s manifesto.
The reaction was....Well we cant let that out. Oh ! His face book has him holding a Confederate battle flag, (Which to many is simply an ensign of protest and rebellion), that must be his excuse The Confederates made him do this horrible act ! Let’s get them !
Well they’re doing a good job of perverting what that battle flag represented at the same time ignoring the very mentioning of the regimes complicity in engendering those previous racial incidents.
Even so, just judging by the postings here to defending Trumps typical reaction to any criticism implied or direct will draw a personal response from Trump which never addresses the political issue at hand but a suggestion that the attacker is personally deficient. Trump Chumpions supporting his attacking Haleys rebuttal makes me wonder who they will vote for once Trump does not make the ballot.
In Haley’s case Trump miss-characterized her position as supporting amnesty. In that statement she was quite definite and against it. But siding with with the go along get alongs is where she should be chastised.
Because Trump does not think like a conservative or approach issues as one. He responds to criticism in a personal way. Such as with Fox news Kelly; That Misogyny claim where he should have compared the news treatment of Sara Palin. Instead goes on CNN, Trump crudely suggests Kelly was in her “periodâ€.
Or Trumps confrontation handling Univision’s Mexican government defender Jorge Ramos interruption .Here he could have brought up Ramos’s dual citizenship, Mexican claims on US states, as well as their 2nd class treatment of American retirees who can’t vote or own property there. Let alone what the Mexicans do with illegals. And then kick him out because of his behavior. Instead those issues went ignored with his can’t we be friends dismissal .
And before his challange to Haley. Trump Should have told those Brit politicians to ,piss off, who wont let him in Britan because of his position on Islam. Instead Trump responds by threatening disinvestments.
Alas while I find this is a serious flaw with this candidate. It is also true no one in the chain of command wants to admit that the nut job while he may have a posting with he being pictured with the CBF. Had nothing to do according to his testament, with his insanity driven murders at that Charlestown church. Because it is expedient not to hold the regime accountable for its abuse of the Bully Pulpit creating racial division.
Maybe little Rubius told her that she could wear his “booties” and his women’s underwear if she recanted her statement.
Nikki was to busy pulling up her trousers to pay attention to the details
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.