Posted on 01/06/2016 9:51:31 AM PST by springwater13
Conservative commentator Ann Coulter, who has been boosting Donald Trump for president, took to Twitter on Wednesday to declare that Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) is not a natural born citizen.
Ann Coulter @AnnCoulter
Same lawyers who said anchor babies are in the Constitution now tell us being born outside U.S to 1 American parent = natural born citizen.
Ann Coulter @AnnCoulter
NYT: Cruz was born outside the U.S. to 1 American parent: "Under the Constitution this makes him a 'natural born citizen.'â Absolutely false
Coulter joins Trump in questioning whether Cruz can legally be president.
âRepublicans are going to have to ask themselves the question: âDo we want a candidate who could be tied up in court for two years?â Thatâd be a big problem,â Trump told The Washington Post on Tuesday.
(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...
You think that would work huh?
Most Americans (left or right), like Canadians more than any other nationality.
...and frankly not having read one comment other than your’s, if the imposer in the white house can reign, Ted Cruze should have the same option.
=============================================
NOTE At the time, King George, and wealthy England, were the colonists' boogeymen. It was feared the wealthy could surreptitiously buy their way into our new country's councils and wreak havoc.
====================================================
OLD THINGS SEEM NEW AGAIN Cruz's wife is a Goldman Sachs exec.
Mrs Cruz served on the North American Union task force, and supported their report called---'Building a North American Community."
The North/South border effort was sponsored by the Council on Foreign Relations in association with the Canadian Council of Chief Executives and the Consejo Mexicano de Asuntos Internacionales.
Translated into English, that means forget US sovereignty....just eradicate US borders.
Canada is under the jurisdiction of England.
Romney = father of Obamacare, supported abortion most of his life, supported gay marriage most of his life, liberal most of his life etc
Bachmann = Fought with all her strength against Obamacare, lifetime against abortion, gay marriage, conservative all her life etc
HUGE difference.
I base the above on the following
The authors cite to the Naturalization Act of 1790 and ignore the fact that the Naturalization Act of 1795, with the lead of then-Rep. James Madison and with the approval of President George Washington, repealed it and specifically changed "shall be considered as natural born citizens" to "shall be considered as citizens of the United States."
James Madison the "father of the Constitution" changed the wording from "natural born citizen" to "citizen". Madison was no dope and the change was to prevent a foriegn born from becoming Commander in Chief. But this also serves to illustrate that "citizen at birth" does not mean "natural born citizen".
See more at
https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/tag/harvard-law-review/
Thank you for the in-depth. FRegards ....
No, I don’t think it would be all that effective, not if Cruz runs against her the way Trump does.
[Did I post this here yet?]
‘Ann Coulter, for Cruz citizenship before she was against it!’ â TexasCajun
Ann Coulter mocked for contradictory tweets about Ted Cruz birtherism
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3380437/posts
Would be nice to get his settled before before Iowa votes. (Dreaming)
Dems, the GOPe & MSM would love to see Cruz declared ineligible.
How long before a legal challenge by Dems or GOPe candidates.
...or even Trump should he feel seriously challenged.
For now, Trump is content to just stir the pot and watch.
The difference is Obama was born in the USA Cruz was not. And just to keep the record straight. Cruzs' father was a naturalized Canadian when Ted was born in Canada. Had Obama not provided "proof" of his USA birth he would not have been eligible to serve as POTUS.
The right went after O hard on this issue, to now do a complete 180 just because it is our guy running will turn off millions of voters. Late night comedy will have a field day on "conservatives".
The Cato institute is a libertarian think tank. Real Libertarians are mostly insane on issues like citizenship and the Constitution. They are good on tax and limited government issues. Other than those issues they are loony birds.
I am amazed at how well public schools have succeeded in dumbing down the American people. Sad. I’m happy I went to school in the 50’s and 60’s. Ann Coulter did not vote to throw US sovereignty into the towel bowl by giving zero fast tracking authority on super secret trade deals. Ann Coulter does not want a 500% increase in H1B visas that but Americans out of work. Ann Coulter has not shown remarkable “flexibility” on the issue of (legal) immigration. Ann Coulter did not vote to renew the anti-liberty and anti-Forth Amendment Patriot Act.
There are three types of citizenship
* Natural Born Citizen, two citizen parents born on soil (exceptions for foreign born if parents are abroad in service to country) McCain
* Citizen by birth, foreign born to citizen parent(s) Ted Cruz
* Naturalized citizen, a person made a citizen by statute. Rafael Cruz
I base the above on the following
The authors cite to the Naturalization Act of 1790 and ignore the fact that the Naturalization Act of 1795, with the lead of then-Rep. James Madison and with the approval of President George Washington, repealed it and specifically changed "shall be considered as natural born citizens" to "shall be considered as citizens of the United States."
James Madison the "father of the Constitution" changed the wording from "natural born citizen" to "citizen". Madison was no dope and the change was to prevent a foriegn born from becoming Commander in Chief. But this also serves to illustrate that "citizen at birth" does not mean "natural born citizen".
See more at
https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/tag/harvard-law-review/
Absolutely correct. Where is the Consular Report of Birth Abroad?
And murkiness fades.
.
Your interpretation is your own, and is found nowhere else, because it is specious.
.
Simply nonsense.
This is not rocket science.
But hay lets just throw our Constitution in the toilet and elect Cruz. If zero can be POTUS then so can Cruz, the hell with what the Constitution says, right?
Newt lost when he went soft on illegal immigration. Romney was the hardliner on that issue that cycle.
Didn’t Ann Coulter have something negative to say about birthers back when Obama’s eligibility was questioned ?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.