Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Star Wars ... Mark Steyn
Steyn Online ^ | 19 Dec 2015 | Mark Steyn

Posted on 12/20/2015 12:35:06 AM PST by Rummyfan

Stabilize your rear deflectors! From a galaxy far far away - the summer of 1977 - Star Wars is back, rebooted for the 21st century and in hopes that after a decade's time-out the series has shaken off its turn-of-the-century "prequels", agreed even by hardcore fans to have been disappointing.

Not that it made any difference to the grosses: One of the remarkable features of the franchise is its resistance to quality control. Sci-fi wasn't boffo before Star Wars - if anything, rather the opposite: It was regarded as the upmarket intellectual end of genre fiction. Then George Lucas came along, and hijacked the entire field, with little more than a guy with a bucket on his head, a dog with a stick-on moustache, a talking garbage can and a princess wearing two cinnamon rolls on her ears.

But what do I know? Star Wars is the most successful movie ever. It's supposed to be "epic" and "primal", but, if so, it beats me. A film such as, say, High Noon, which takes place in real time — 90 minutes — on one dusty monochrome main street lined with plywood house fronts and whose only special effect is Tex Ritter's plaintive rendition of the title song, is truly primal: it's big at its core. Star Wars, it seems to me, is epic only in the sense that the telephone book is epic.

(Excerpt) Read more at steynonline.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last
To: Rummyfan
True, some of the talking-heads are green or blue or have three eyes and scales, but, when they open their mouths, they all sound like deputy assistant G20 trade ministers staying robotically on message.

See it, I will, when to Netflix it comes.

21 posted on 12/20/2015 4:16:35 AM PST by St_Thomas_Aquinas ( Isaiah 22:22, Matthew 16:19, Revelation 3:7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: twister881

And “The Searchers” is better than either of them.

CC


22 posted on 12/20/2015 4:33:42 AM PST by Celtic Conservative (CC: purveyor of cryptic, snarky posts since December, 2000..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 4rcane

Mark Stein is the Force!


23 posted on 12/20/2015 4:34:13 AM PST by urbanpovertylawcenter (the law and poverty collide in an urban setting and sparks fly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: urbanpovertylawcenter

Steyn!


24 posted on 12/20/2015 4:34:35 AM PST by urbanpovertylawcenter (the law and poverty collide in an urban setting and sparks fly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup

The force is based on the duality that is often found in east Asian religions. Y’know, “yin” and “yang”. It should be instructive of Lucas’ worldview that Japanese director Akira Kurosawa was one of his biggest influences. So, I’ll admit that insofar that “Star Wars” espouses eastern religious themes it is indeed “anti Christian”. But, not perhaps as many others use that particular phrase.

CC


25 posted on 12/20/2015 4:41:39 AM PST by Celtic Conservative (CC: purveyor of cryptic, snarky posts since December, 2000..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan

One of my pet peeves with Star Wars — and something which tells me that Lucas is a classic Liberal — is the desperate need to “bring balance to the Force”.

Let’s see: the Jedi help maintain the Galactic Republic and they work closely with the Senators who control the galaxy, through their Jedi Council. There is a system of Jedi Masters and their up-and-coming Padawans. There is a massive Jedi Library, and an academy for many “younglings”. That’s the Jedi side of things.

Then there are the Sith. Everyone thought the Sith were eliminated. Gone. No more. Wiped out. Turns out that one of them shows up. And, as Yoda knows, “there are always two”.

So the task is to “bring balance to the Force” by making sure that the Jedi are once again the only game in town.

Sounds like the approach Leftists take to the discussion of politics. They side needs 100% domination because Conservatives are pure evil. You need to wipe out your opponents if you want a balanced world.

Huh?


26 posted on 12/20/2015 4:50:39 AM PST by ClearCase_guy (I don't know what Claire Wolfe is thinking but I know what I am thinking.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan

“Han Solo’s strangely Onanistic moniker..”

Yowsa, have to say that never occurred to me. Steyn is brilliant.


27 posted on 12/20/2015 4:54:25 AM PST by PlateOfShrimp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan
He used to look like Princess Di flashing those big eyes from under his hair. But suddenly he looks like Princess Di with too much kohl and in a peevish mood. What can this mean?

LOL!!!

28 posted on 12/20/2015 5:06:07 AM PST by Tax-chick (Maximizing my cultural appropriation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus

Agree I must.


29 posted on 12/20/2015 5:08:10 AM PST by wally_bert (I didn't get where I am today by selling ice cream tasting of bookends, pumice stone & West Germany)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Celtic Conservative

“The Searchers” is better than anything except “Lawrence of Arabia.”


30 posted on 12/20/2015 5:16:57 AM PST by Tax-chick (Maximizing my cultural appropriation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan
most of the other characters are computer-generated, except for Jabba the Hutt, here played by Larry Flynt

The Steyn it is.

31 posted on 12/20/2015 5:33:08 AM PST by sphinx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan

“Lucas was by now a director without peer when it comes to getting bad performances out of great actors.”

Great line.

By the way, I just picked up Mr. Steyn’s latest album:

Feline Groovy: Songs for Swingin’ Cats

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B017SCLL32?psc=1&redirect=true&ref_=oh_aui_detailpage_o01_s00

Merry Christmas!


32 posted on 12/20/2015 5:34:08 AM PST by BBB333 (Q: Which is grammatically correct? Joe Biden IS or Joe Biden ARE an idiot?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan

Is highway safety really the right place to be making sci-fi references and bad puns, using public service billboards to call aggressive drivers wookiees? Has the Department of Transportation been hijacked by preteen otakus? Please keep our interstates professional and keep the jokes to Twitter or Facebook.


33 posted on 12/20/2015 5:42:06 AM PST by conservativeimage (The Ministry has fallen. The Minister of Magic is dead. . . . They are coming. . . They are coming.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Celtic Conservative
The force is based on the duality that is often found in east Asian religions. Y'know, "yin" and "yang". It should be instructive of Lucas' worldview that Japanese director Akira Kurosawa was one of his biggest influences. So, I'll admit that insofar that "Star Wars" espouses eastern religious themes it is indeed "anti Christian". But, not perhaps as many others use that particular phrase.
CC


At the risk of sounding Sith-like ("Anakin! Only a Sith deals in such absolutes!") the fact is that Jesus said "No one cometh unto the Father except by Me" which precludes any other set of religious beliefs achieving what Christ alone achieved, which was and is to provide a sole and singular path of Salvation, Buddha didn't do it, Mohammed for damn sure didn't do it, and no other religious figure did it. It was Jesus Christ and only Him who died for our sins and by which we are saved through Faith.

Jesus also said "He who denieth me before men, I will deny before the Father", and I contend that is exactly what Lucas has done with his immensely wealthy franchise and for any lost souls who embraced the philosophies in 'Star Wars' and as a result, choose to reject the teachings of Christ, those souls are on Lucas' head.

I wouldn't want to be him for ANY amount of money.
34 posted on 12/20/2015 5:43:15 AM PST by mkjessup (This is OUR freakin' Country!! Close the borders to ALL Muslims!! Trump is RIGHT !!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan

Steyn is a fabulous film and theater critic. I first read him in Broadway Babies Say Goodnight - excellent theater criticism.


35 posted on 12/20/2015 5:49:51 AM PST by miss marmelstein (Richard then Third: I like to destroy the Turks (Moslims))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus

Steyn is correct and nails it. I was wondering why I could never EVER watch those last Lucas’ episodes. I tried for a few minutes once because I had sons-—but that Jar Jar character ended all desires to ever watch anything “Star Wars” again. I just couldn’t make myself do it.


36 posted on 12/20/2015 5:53:07 AM PST by savagesusie (Right Reason According to Nature = Just Law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan

One of the things I recall about the 1977 release is how welcome it seemed at the time. The whole grand and clear-cut good versus evil, tied to old-time, b-movie and serialesque adventure. For roughly a decade before this, there had been a real dearth of such upbeat, envigorating fare. The movie theaters seemed to bounce back-and-forth between a sort of adult bleakness with things like “Looking for Mr. Goodbar” and the occasional handful of forgettable Disney live-action slapstick comedies like “Gus” and “One of Our Dinosaurs is Missing.”

There wasn’t anything “fun” for the escapist crowd, akin to the old swashbuckling films with Fairbanks Jr. or Louis Hayward, or good-guy western heroes, or Jungle Jim heroes battling escaped Nazis on dangerous cliffsides... that whole kind of gut-level, crowd-cheering, fantasy hokum that had really been around since the beginning of film, going back to Pearl White and Rin-Tin-Tin. Somehow, in the 1970s, that had really, really disappeared, and I think there was a sort of deep cultural longing for it, which “Star Wars” tended to come along and tap, out of the blue.

So, mainly I just remember how extremely ‘welcome’ it seemed at the time. Which was great. Unfortunately, it also led to the whole blockbuster trend in the film industry, which ultimately served up a lot more negatives than positives.


37 posted on 12/20/2015 5:54:09 AM PST by greene66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cvq3842

“Plus, these 2-Disc DVD’s will feature a bonus disc that includes, for the first time ever on DVD, the original films as seen in theaters in 1977, 1980 and 1983.”

http://www.amazon.com/Star-Wars-IV-Limited-Edition/dp/B000FQJAIW


38 posted on 12/20/2015 5:56:24 AM PST by vladimir998 (Apparently I'm still living in your head rent free. At least now it isn't empty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick
“The Searchers” is better than anything except “Lawrence of Arabia.”

Yes! It s one of the rare movies that transcends its genre, like "Vertigo."

39 posted on 12/20/2015 5:58:11 AM PST by St_Thomas_Aquinas ( Isaiah 22:22, Matthew 16:19, Revelation 3:7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan
I usually hang on every word of a Steyn rant but this time I tend to disagree. I am watching the original 6 (just saw the 3rd last night) and it is entertainment deluxe - serious and comical all rolled in to one ball of wax and also preaches a message you don't see too often these days - when the Sith Lord/Senator keeps amassing power (voted upon him for the special times) the Jedi council sees the danger of one man accumulating too much power. It also carries the message of good and evil and the dangerous ways that evil can lure one into its grasp.

Haven't seen them in years and it's a decent experience to watch one a night - will see 4 tonight unless football lures me into it's arena...then 4 gets held off until tomorrow.

40 posted on 12/20/2015 6:14:55 AM PST by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson