Posted on 09/26/2015 4:34:57 AM PDT by McGruff
Donald Trump accused his Republican presidential rivals on Friday night of wanting to "start World War III over Syria," and suggested that the United States should instead let Russia deal with the problem.
Trump has recently faced criticism for not providing details on what sort of foreign policy positions he would take as president. That lack of specifics is purposeful and strategic, Trump said during a 50-minute speech at the Great State Fair of Oklahoma on Friday night. He said Republicans who publicly share their strategic foreign policy plans are "crazy."
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
Maybe that’s the best answer under the circumstances for getting rid of ISIS. But it also means Russia now gets another client. I think this is like telling the ocean to get wet. It already is. Barack is not going to send troops there to take care of ISIS.
Trump blusters and is incoherent, as usual.
And yes, I read the whole thing.
Russian soldiers don’t have the insane restrictions of Obama’s rules of engagement , so they will be successful.
Even the Pope is wrong as soon ISIS will take the Vatican.
Leading from behind is going to cost us anyway.
Russia and Iran will own the Middle East soon.
If Russia can take this on and block that access while the EU deals with the very bad internal situation they now have, it might save civilization. On another thread, it was reported that Russia and China have legitimate concerns. They have nationals from radical groups fighting with ISIS, and want to destroy them before they return to their homelands.
Russian troops in Syria and the Prime Minister of Hungary have done more to save western civilization in the last month than the US military has in the last 25 years.
good point. BTW, did you hear about this Trumper-tantrum?
http://www.mediaite.com/online/donald-trump-threatens-to-sue-t-shirt-company-for-mocking-him/
Mediaite isn’t exactly an unbiased source. Try to stay on topic here.
Yeah, I am a fan of The Don...
But I do have to say that this sounds a lot like the guy that says...”Plan?! Yeah, I got a plan... But I wont tell you what it is because... It’s a secret plan! Yeah Secret! That’s the ticket!”
Yeah I know what he’s saying. He’s doing the Corleone thing... Never let em know what you’re thinking. I’m still a fan though. Because the way I see it, He’s showing the other candidates how to do it. And taking all the heat. Hopefully they will get up on their hind legs, grow spines and start advocating for OUR SIDE for a change.
Now with Boner out of the way...
Hope we get someplace.
Well, that’s pretty much what we’re doing.
-—— Let them do it-——
it is no longer an issue
they are doing it and can’t be stopped
obama’s pacifist legacy is at stake
A: I didn’t address it to you, nor did I intend to address it again in this thread.....so now it’s you who are staying off topic.
B: He either is or he is not going threatening to sue the tee shirt company. I don’t care what the source is, only the validity of the information.
We all know who he meant here.
Anyone who wants to trust the lives of their sons and daughters to muslim obama for military deployment raise your hand...
Let someone else deal with it... He’s taking a real tough-talking hard line here.
If I were going to fight ISIS I would much rather it be under the ROE of Russia than the obama ROE, ‘Avoid civilian casualties at all cost.’
But then again, if I were to be fighting ISIS it would mean that ISIS was in Maine and then the rules of engagement would be simple, Kill them all, let God sort them out.
Things can get strange. Some years ago, a global warming treaty was heralded to be almost a done deal. It would have been a disaster for the West, and just at that time, the Russians published some hacked emails from the global warming idiots and torpedoed the whole thing.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.