Posted on 09/16/2015 10:35:42 PM PDT by ScottWalkerForPresident2016
Edited on 09/16/2015 10:47:26 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
Controversial pundit tweets...
See link for the rest
Anorexia is a cultural heritage of a religion for some along with the anti-semitism, inclinations toward organized corruption and more common anti-family attitudes in such families. I’ve seen it all too closely in person before. Terrible ordeal for unsuspecting outsiders who find out about the in-laws sometime after a marriage.
Yeah, it makes sense, really.
“I don’t think I agree with that, Mears.”
We’ll have to agree to disagree then,like two adults.
I don’t gat into long,tedious arguments—ever.
:-)
.
When you are a bomb thrower, that's what you do. I recall hearing her refer to Edwards as "Silky Pony" in a TV interview, thus the attribution. She may well have called him a faggot, but his predilection for philandering should have negated that.
Thank you for correcting me. I had heard her call Edwards “Silky Pony” in a TV interview.
Now there's a choice cut of bigotry I've never heard before. Spit it out, there, familyop! What religion are you talking about? Inquiring minds want to know!
And according to “Liz”, FR’s resident Anti-Semite, Cruz misused the “goodwill” of this “Christian” front group by promoting a “personal agenda” for his own “selfish reasons”. Liz also rejoiced that Cruz was booed off stage.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3316779/posts
(Comment #14)
Liz was called out on this before numerous times because they kept posting about how Cruz was a globalist shrill, NWO hack bought and paid for by the crony capitalists and neocons (i.e. Zionists in the Ron Paul vernacular) and most recently when that didn’t work, listing all of Cruz’s Senate committee appointments in an attempt to discredit him over lack of accomplishment as a do-nothing.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3316774/posts
(Comment #20)
Well it looks like Liz has company now with Coulter. Maybe they are one and the same.
I agree with Mark Levin. He called Coulter a “Jacka$$”.
What an asinine thing to say! Do you (and Ann) think Jews are the only ones who care about Israel? I admit that I, a gentile, have divided loyalties. I've never stepped foot in Israel, but I care deeply and profoundly about the nation of Israel and the Jewish people. It matters a great deal to me how resolutely the candidates align themselves with the plight of Israel in these extremely troubled times.
The next president is going to have to undo a lot of damage that the puppet of satan who sits in our White House has done during his administration. That you and Ann the Hideous think addressing Israel in this election discussion is pandering is frighteningly telling. Perhaps satan's puppet has been more effective than I could have imagined. Not a surprise though. A couple of thousand years ago, God told us these kinds of things would happen.
Maranatha.
As a conservative I’m a strong believer in freedom of speech and the right to criticize, debate or say anything about anyone or any group even if it offends. Freedom of speech is the right to be offended. Wasn’t Freedom of Speech (unlike Eurpe, etc) a fundamental tenant? Did our founding fathers tell the settlers not to call the Indians fxxxxxx native Americans. We appear to be quickly losing that right and it is a slippery slope to leftist-dom.
Is it true that the leftist elites would like to enact laws that would restrict what one says, and require that a muzzle be applied by a judicial body of political correctness to ensure that no one is offended.
In my view it should make no difference what was said or about whom or what group....if we truly accept freedom. Names and words do not hurt, but sticks and stones do. Conservatism to me will never include some hyper concern about hurt feelings or the need for a PC muzzle at the expense of our right to opinions. If that is the way she felt about it then it should be discussed and not muzzled.
Easy.I’m on your side here.
>> Israel, our ally in the Middle East, which is surrounded by enemies hell-bent on its destruction, could use some assurance by those seeking the presidency of the United States. Especially after the way they've been treated by the current Regime. <<
Agreed. Whenever foreign policy comes up, the candidates should unequivocally state they support Isreal's right to exist, and denounce extreme terrorist groups that want to wipe Israel off the map. I'm also against dictating to Israel where they are allowed to build "settlements" and telling them what they can do with their borders. We have zero right to interfere with another country's sovereignty, and they sure as hell wouldn't like it if Isreali government told us that we should give Texas back to Mexico in the name of "peace". I'm equally appalled that supposedly "pro-Israel" politicians like George W. Bush and Condi Rice -- supported the insane idea of giving the Palestinians "statehood" when their government was run by Hamas. I'd hope our current crop of candidates is smarter than that.
That being said, the candidates were asked about what they would do for AMERICANS, and they went off topic to THAT question and talked about what they'd do for Israeli instead. They were clearly pandering to Jewish American voters, most of whom don't give a hoot about Israel no matter how much we kiss their butts. THAT is what Ann Coulter was objecting to. (can't believe I'm defending loudmouth idiot Ann and her potty mouth, but I understand what she was trying to convey). Talking about Israel in response to US domestic policy is an inappropriate as talking about the need to reduce abortion is you're asked about your education policy.
Finally, while we're on the topic of Israel's internal security and mixing domestic issues with foreign policy, I'd argue that many of Israel's OWN government officials seem "hell-bent on its destruction" with their left-wing, extremely socially liberal policy. Israel's rampant support of gay rights and taxpayer abortion-on-demand is NOT something we should blindly ignore in order to make them feel good about themselves. Israel is killing more Jewish babies than the Palestinians could ever dream of. If they continue down the path they're going, Israel will be a majority Arab nation in a few decades. If I was President and truly cared about saving "Israel", I'd give Netanyahu an earful about that instead of blindly "standing by" everything Israel says and does. It's appalling that these policies are occurring under his "conservative" government and he doesn't oppose it. Fiscal conservatism and social liberalism doesn't work.
Evangelical Christians care a lot about Israel. If they were pandering to anyone it was probably them and not Jews.
Ann pretty much acknowledged that in her next tweet:
Cruz, Huckabee Rubio all mentioned ISRAEL in their response to: “What will AMERICA look like after you are president.” — Ann Coulter (@AnnCoulter) September 17, 2015
How many f—ing Jews do these people think there are in the United States? — Ann Coulter (@AnnCoulter) September 17, 2015
Maybe it’s to suck up to the Evangelicals. — Ann Coulter (@AnnCoulter) September 17, 2015
Again, the irony is they “stand by Israel” even when Israel’s policies are self-destructive. If I were President, I’d be giving Netanyahu an earful.
You’re right, Bibi shouldn’t get a pass for allowing horrible domestic policies.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.