Posted on 08/19/2015 9:26:04 PM PDT by Swordmaker
Americas next president could be eased into office not just by TV ads or speeches, but by Googles secret decisions, and no oneexcept for me and perhaps a few other obscure researcherswould know how this was accomplished.
Research I have been directing in recent years suggests that Google, Inc., has amassed far more power to control electionsindeed, to control a wide variety of opinions and beliefsthan any company in history has ever had. Googles search algorithm can easily shift the voting preferences of undecided voters by 20 percent or moreup to 80 percent in some demographic groupswith virtually no one knowing they are being manipulated, according to experiments I conducted recently with Ronald E. Robertson.
Given that many elections are won by small margins, this gives Google the power, right now, to flip upwards of 25 percent of the national elections worldwide. In the United States, half of our presidential elections have been won by margins under 7.6 percent, and the 2012 election was won by a margin of only 3.9 percentwell within Googles control.
(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...
Don’t buy it.
Paper Ballots, everyone. It’s high time to go retro and return to physical voting ballots. Hacking has influenced some top security agencies in Germany to retrain their agents on communicating by a typewriter. You heard me, a typewriter,the type you may have seen on the show Mad Men.
I posted the sudden disappearance of all Obama Birth Certificate thumbnails on FreeRepublic and others then started noticing the difficulty in finding images to look at the BC. It took almost a week before public outcry resulted in Google replacing the thumbnails with correct images. They claimed it was a single employee who did it. Sure. . . right. . . Do a search for Obama Birth Certificate and get photos of groups of people, the White House, even Palm Trees? But no birth certificates??? Click on the thumbnails of any of them and it would still take you to a photo of the birth certificate website, or the photo itself, but the thumbnail was wrong.
They have politicususa appear as a legitimate news site when you do searches, so this isn’t a surprise.
This has nothing to do with ballots. This has everything to do with Google presenting only negative stories for candidates they DON'T like and positive stories for those they DO like when a person does a search for that candidate's name. It sways the potential voters opinion of the candidate. . . the people who did the study tried in with various people in artificial situations and then tried in REAL elections in India and got REAL results.
It sways the undecideds and the low-information voters who are looking for information on making their decisions. . . and it is QUITE effective. THEY think Google is impartial, but it isn't. You and I know this, but THE LOW INFORMATION VOTER DOES NOT! They think they are getting a fair representation of the stories about the candidates when it is being deliberately skewed.
It is the ultimate example of a one newspaper town controlling the news a voter base gets.
I buy that they’re doing it but not that it makes that much difference any more than tv news being skewed does. The media is the enemy, we know this. I doubt Romney would have won if Google linked to more positive stories about him.
I do, Jim, but it isn't me that would be so easily swayed. . . it's the low information voter who has Google as their default search engine and thinks they are the best source to find out anything factual.
There is absolutely NO WAY we can change enough undecided voters to move to an unbiased search engine before the election to stop Google's evil ways from having this effect.
Read the article. . . the studies showed that it did have that much effect in elections.
Add Yahoo and AOL to the “reprehensible people at Google.”
Yeah, the horse-pucky quotient is off the charts with this one.
Search engines - and their algorithms - prey on the undecideds. It is our job as the elections approach to talk to everyone we can about our candidate and the dangers presented by theirs.
Enough is enough!!!
It’s pure coincidence that Obama meets frequently with the pointy heads at Google and facebook.
I’m going to do a web search on that.
Thanks very much for posting this article.
Admittedly, I am a computer dunce, but even I notice Google’s bias; most notably when searching for ugly or unflattering photos of demonic-rats to use on our FReepathon threads.
Of course, whenever I search for articles, I’ve also noted Google’s bias against conservative politicians. Sure enough, the stories spiked at the top are almost always negative, despite the date and time the said articles were originally posted.
I believe that most Americans are damn sick and tired of what Zero's been doing to the country over the last seven years, and that they're ready for a radical change from the 'business as usual' politics of Washington.
Note that the top tier Republican candidates are all political outsiders. Even on the Dem side, a 73 year old wackadoodle socialist is about to eclipse Mrs. Inevitable Establishment Politician.
Yeah, Google is really helping the Uniparty candidates.....not.
The country is on fire. Google is only going to be able to influence a small portion of the people to move toward an establishment candidate.
Great catch.
I suspect they were part of scrubbing the scene of the Illinois senate race between Obama and alan Keyes from the Internet where Keyes says Obama wasn’t even born in this country, and Obama says we are talking about the senate, not the presidency. I SAW THAT CLIP HERE ON FR but it is gone from the Internet. Even Keyes says it never happened but I saw it with my own eyes and they were both sitting down and there was no smoking gun. Obama could easily lie that bit away. But yet it is GONE.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.