Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

§1401. Nationals and citizens of United States at birth (law-not constitution-re immigration)
http://uscode.house.gov/browse/prelim@title8/chapter12/subchapter3/part1&edition=prelim ^ | 2015 | US Congress

Posted on 08/18/2015 12:04:39 PM PDT by longtermmemmory

Title 8-ALIENS AND NATIONALITY CHAPTER 12-IMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY SUBCHAPTER III-NATIONALITY AND NATURALIZATION Part I-Nationality at Birth and Collective Naturalization

§1401. Nationals and citizens of United States at birth The following shall be nationals and citizens of the United States at birth:

(a) a person born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof;

(b) a person born in the United States to a member of an Indian, Eskimo, Aleutian, or other aboriginal tribe: Provided, That the granting of citizenship under this subsection shall not in any manner impair or otherwise affect the right of such person to tribal or other property;

(c) a person born outside of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents both of whom are citizens of the United States and one of whom has had a residence in the United States or one of its outlying possessions, prior to the birth of such person;

(d) a person born outside of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents one of whom is a citizen of the United States who has been physically present in the United States or one of its outlying possessions for a continuous period of one year prior to the birth of such person, and the other of whom is a national, but not a citizen of the United States;

(e) a person born in an outlying possession of the United States of parents one of whom is a citizen of the United States who has been physically present in the United States or one of its outlying possessions for a continuous period of one year at any time prior to the birth of such person;

(f) a person of unknown parentage found in the United States while under the age of five years, until shown, prior to his attaining the age of twenty-one years, not to have been born in the United States;

(g) a person born outside the geographical limits of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents one of whom is an alien, and the other a citizen of the United States who, prior to the birth of such person, was physically present in the United States or its outlying possessions for a period or periods totaling not less than five years, at least two of which were after attaining the age of fourteen years: Provided, That any periods of honorable service in the Armed Forces of the United States, or periods of employment with the United States Government or with an international organization as that term is defined in section 288 of title 22 by such citizen parent, or any periods during which such citizen parent is physically present abroad as the dependent unmarried son or daughter and a member of the household of a person (A) honorably serving with the Armed Forces of the United States, or (B) employed by the United States Government or an international organization as defined in section 288 of title 22, may be included in order to satisfy the physical-presence requirement of this paragraph. This proviso shall be applicable to persons born on or after December 24, 1952, to the same extent as if it had become effective in its present form on that date; and

(h) a person born before noon (Eastern Standard Time) May 24, 1934, outside the limits and jurisdiction of the United States of an alien father and a mother who is a citizen of the United States who, prior to the birth of such person, had resided in the United States.

(June 27, 1952, ch. 477, title III, ch. 1, §301, 66 Stat. 235 ; Pub. L. 89–770, Nov. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 1322 ; Pub. L. 92–584, §§1, 3, Oct. 27, 1972, 86 Stat. 1289 ; Pub. L. 95–432, §§1, 3, Oct. 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 1046 ; Pub. L. 99–653, §12, Nov. 14, 1986, 100 Stat. 3657 ; Pub. L. 103–416, title I, §101(a), Oct. 25, 1994, 108 Stat. 4306 .)

Amendments 1994-Subsec. (h). Pub. L. 103–416 added subsec. (h).

1986-Subsec. (g). Pub. L. 99–653 substituted "five years, at least two" for "ten years, at least five".

1978-Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 95–432, §3, struck out "(a)" before "The following" and redesignated pars. (1) to (7) as (a) to (g), respectively.

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 95–432, §1, struck out subsec. (b) which provided that any person who was a national or citizen of the United States under subsec. (a)(7) lose his nationality or citizenship unless he be continuously physically present in the United States for a period of not less than two years between the ages of 14 and 28 or that the alien parent be naturalized while the child was under 18 years of age and the child began permanent residence in the United States while under 18 years of age and that absence from the United States of less than 60 days not break the continuity of presence.

Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 95–432, §1, struck out subsec. (c) which provided that former subsec. (b) apply to persons born abroad subsequent to May 24, 1934, except that this not be construed to alter the citizenship of any person born abroad subsequent to May 24, 1934 who, prior to the effective date of this chapter, had taken up residence in the United States before attaining 16 years of age, and thereafter, whether before or after the effective date of this chapter, complied with the residence requirements of section 201(g) and (h) of the Nationality Act of 1940.

Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 95–432, §1, struck out subsec. (d) which provided that nothing in former subsec. (b) be construed to alter the citizenship of any person who came into the United States prior to Oct. 27, 1972, and who, whether before or after Oct. 27, 1972, immediately following such coming complied with the physical presence requirements for retention of citizenship specified in former subsec. (b), prior to amendment of former subsec. (b) by Pub. L. 92–584.

1972-Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 92–584, §1, substituted provisions that nationals and citizens of the United States under subsec. (a)(7), lose such status unless they are present continuously in the United States for two years between the ages of fourteen and twenty eight years, or the alien parent is naturalized while the child is under the age of eighteen years and the child begins to reside permanently in the United States while under the age of eighteen years, and that absence from the United States of less than sixty days will not break the continuity of presence, for provisions that such status would be lost unless the nationals and citizens come to the United States prior to attaining twenty three years and be present continuously in the United States for five years, and that such presence should be between the age of fourteen and twenty eight years.

Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 92–584, §3, added subsec. (d).

1966-Subsec. (a)(7). Pub. L. 89–770 authorized periods of employment with the United States Government or with an international organization by the citizen parent, or any periods during which the citizen parent is physically present abroad as the dependent unmarried son or daughter and a member of the household of a person (A) honorably serving with the Armed Forces of the United States, or (B) employed by the United States Government or an international organization, to be included in order to satisfy the physical presence requirement, and permitted the proviso to be applicable to persons born on or after December 24, 1952.

Effective Date of 1986 Amendment Pub. L. 99–653, §23(d), as added by Pub. L. 100–525, §8(r), Oct. 24, 1988, 102 Stat. 2619 , provided that: "The amendment made by section 12 [amending this section] shall apply to persons born on or after November 14, 1986."

Effective Date of 1978 Amendment Pub. L. 95–432, §1, Oct. 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 1046 , provided that the amendment made by section 1 is effective Oct. 10, 1978.

Effective Date Chapter effective 180 days after June 27, 1952, see section 407 of act June 27, 1952, set out as a note under section 1101 of this title.

Waiver of Retention Requirements Pub. L. 103–416, title I, §101(b), Oct. 25, 1994, 108 Stat. 4306 , provided that: "Any provision of law (including section 301(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act [8 U.S.C. 1401(b)] (as in effect before October 10, 1978), and the provisos of section 201(g) of the Nationality Act of 1940 [former 8 U.S.C. 601(g)]) that provided for a person's loss of citizenship or nationality if the person failed to come to, or reside or be physically present in, the United States shall not apply in the case of a person claiming United States citizenship based on such person's descent from an individual described in section 301(h) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (as added by subsection (a))."

Retroactive Application of 1994 Amendment Pub. L. 103–416, title I, §101(c), Oct. 25, 1994, 108 Stat. 4306 , provided that:

"(1) Except as provided in paragraph (2), the immigration and nationality laws of the United States shall be applied (to persons born before, on, or after the date of the enactment of this Act [Oct. 25, 1994]) as though the amendment made by subsection (a) [amending this section], and subsection (b) [enacting provisions set out above], had been in effect as of the date of their birth, except that the retroactive application of the amendment and that subsection shall not affect the validity of citizenship of anyone who has obtained citizenship under section 1993 of the Revised Statutes [former 8 U.S.C. 6] (as in effect before the enactment of the Act of May 24, 1934 (48 Stat. 797)).

"(2) The retroactive application of the amendment made by subsection (a), and subsection (b), shall not confer citizenship on, or affect the validity of any denaturalization, deportation, or exclusion action against, any person who is or was excludable from the United States under section 212(a)(3)(E) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1182(a)(3)(E)) (or predecessor provision) or who was excluded from, or who would not have been eligible for admission to, the United States under the Displaced Persons Act of 1948 [former 50 U.S.C. App. 1951 et seq.] or under section 14 of the Refugee Relief Act of 1953 [former 50 U.S.C. App. 1971l]."

Applicability of Transmission Requirements Pub. L. 103–416, title I, §101(d), Oct. 25, 1994, 108 Stat. 4306 , as amended by Pub. L. 104–208, div. C, title VI, §671(b)(1), Sept. 30, 1996, 110 Stat. 3009–721 , provided that: "This section [amending this section and enacting provisions set out above], the amendments made by this section, and any retroactive application of such amendments shall not effect the application of any provision of law relating to residence or physical presence in the United States for purposes of transmitting United States citizenship to any person whose claim is based on the amendment made by subsection (a) [amending this section] or through whom such a claim is derived."

Admission of Alaska as State Alaska Statehood provisions as not conferring, terminating, or restoring United States nationality, see section 21 of Pub. L. 85–508, July 7, 1958, 72 Stat. 339 , set out as a note preceding former section 21 of Title 48, Territories and Insular Possessions.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2016; birthright; citizenship; immigration
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last
This is part of Chapter 8 United States Code Section 1401.

It also has the HISTORY of changes that have been made and what they meant to change.

We can argue all forms of meaningless nuances. (how many angels can dance on the head of a pin etc.) It is all irrelevant against the written down law here.

This is LAW not constitution.

1 posted on 08/18/2015 12:04:39 PM PDT by longtermmemmory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory; Liz; AuntB; La Lydia; sickoflibs; stephenjohnbanker; Tolerance Sucks Rocks; ...

(a) a person born in the United States, AND SUBJECT TO THE JURISDICTION THEREOF


2 posted on 08/18/2015 12:09:05 PM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
This is LAW not constitution.

Do you mean, unconstitutional? Can you explain.

3 posted on 08/18/2015 12:11:07 PM PDT by Parmy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee Nana
A person born in the US and subject to the jurisdiction of the US

I'm no lawyer. My take on that sentence is the same as yours. If a person is in the US illegally, they aren't subject to our laws. As far as other non-citizens in the US, I can't imagine why they can't sign something that acknowledges that the citizenship of any children they have is not US citizenship.

4 posted on 08/18/2015 12:13:17 PM PDT by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory

Here’s someone who gets it:

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/08/18/watch-latino-immigrant-blasts-city-over-illegal-aliens/


5 posted on 08/18/2015 12:14:53 PM PDT by GOPJ (School-to-prison pipeline means gentle giants can choke and beat all the teachers they want.Greenfie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Parmy

laws can be changed by congress. Constitution requires the amendment process.

this is the 14th Amendment:

“Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

Section 2. Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed. But when the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice President of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the Executive and Judicial officers of a State, or the members of the Legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such State, being twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in such State.

Section 3. No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may, by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.

Section 4. The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the United States nor any State shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void.

Section 5. The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.”

To change this requires a constitutional amendment process.


6 posted on 08/18/2015 12:19:25 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: grania

it is like child support. It is not the parent’s to waive.

I thought the text regarding the proof and age for obtaining citizenship before 24 was interesting. it neuters this Obama invasion effort.


7 posted on 08/18/2015 12:22:12 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
Does not matter one whit. The Low-Info voters wouldn't read the law if they were strapped to a chair, had their eyes pinned open, and had the text shoved in their faces on a monitor, under threat of death if they didn't know the material.

The LAW is exactly what the Media and Democrats say it is. In other words, we live in a lawless former empire that is even now, crumbling around us.

8 posted on 08/18/2015 12:25:31 PM PDT by backwoods-engineer (AMERICA IS DONE! When can we start over?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grania
I'm no lawyer. My take on that sentence is the same as yours. If a person is in the US illegally, they aren't subject to our laws.

So if an illegal alien murders someone, we can't prosecute them?

The "subject to the jurisdiction" language excludes foreign diplomats, who have diplomatic immunity (even if they murder someone).

9 posted on 08/18/2015 12:30:20 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: backwoods-engineer

The law can be used to DEFINE the types of jurisdiction.

the law can be used to tie the hands of immigration judges (aka administrative judges NOT article III judges)


10 posted on 08/18/2015 12:32:16 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: grania
I'm no lawyer. My take on that sentence is the same as yours. If a person is in the US illegally, they aren't subject to our laws.

That's a sticky subject. I agree that they are not "subject to the jurisdiction of the US", but they ARE subject to our laws. If someone is here illegally and they murder someone, they've committed a violation of TWO laws and should be held accountable for both. However, since they are not "subject to the jurisdiction of the US", they are not afforded the governmental protections provided by said government. They have no right of seeking justice through our laws. In other words, they can be held accountable to the laws that they break when they infringe on the protected rights of legal citizens, but cannot seek those legal privileges for themselves.

That's my $0.02, and I'm no lawyer neither.
11 posted on 08/18/2015 12:33:05 PM PDT by Sopater (Is it not lawful for me to do what I will with mine own? - Matthew 20:15a)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian

Actually, I think it includes invaders as well. The children of an invading army wouldn’t be citizens would they? So neither should the children of invading barbarians.


12 posted on 08/18/2015 12:36:19 PM PDT by Little Ray (How did I end up in this hand-basket, and why is it getting so hot?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: grania
If a person is in the US illegally, they aren't subject to our laws.

Then they can't be arrested for breaking them?

13 posted on 08/18/2015 12:37:24 PM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Sopater
I agree that they are not "subject to the jurisdiction of the US", but they ARE subject to our laws.

If they are subject to our laws then aren't they subject to our jurisdiction?

14 posted on 08/18/2015 12:38:55 PM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian

I believe that subject to the laws of a country, means subject to taxes, drafting into the military, voting rights, and such things. Of course of you are visiting a foreign country, you are subject to its criminals laws, contract and tax laws if you are doing business in the country, etc; but other laws and rights such as voting rights, right to receive welfare benefits and education, receiving a passport, military service, etc., you are not subject to, and they do not apply to you, because you are not a citizen of that country. This should mean that no one born here whose parents are not subject to our laws (such as voting, military service, etc.) is be a citizen; this person inherits the citizenship of his parents.


15 posted on 08/18/2015 12:44:32 PM PDT by erkelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

they can demand their ambassador intervene in criminal matters. that makes an immigration criminal case international.


16 posted on 08/18/2015 12:46:30 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory

I don’t understand what you mean or the point. May be my fault but, well ... there it is.


17 posted on 08/18/2015 12:49:08 PM PDT by RIghtwardHo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

I see what you’re saying, Sopater. If a non-citizen breaks the law, they are subject to prosecution under US law, BUT they do not have the same rights & protections that a US citizen has under US law.

(not a lawyer, either)


18 posted on 08/18/2015 12:52:11 PM PDT by KGeorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Sopater
I think the commission of any crime by an illegal alien results in getting deported....according to ICE.

That's what should happen.

19 posted on 08/18/2015 12:52:49 PM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg
If they are subject to our laws then aren't they subject to our jurisdiction?

Wouldn't anyone who comes to this country and commits a crime against a U.S. citizen be subject to our laws regardless of whether or not they are subject to our jurisdiction?
20 posted on 08/18/2015 12:55:14 PM PDT by Sopater (Is it not lawful for me to do what I will with mine own? - Matthew 20:15a)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson