Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tennessee Nana
A person born in the US and subject to the jurisdiction of the US

I'm no lawyer. My take on that sentence is the same as yours. If a person is in the US illegally, they aren't subject to our laws. As far as other non-citizens in the US, I can't imagine why they can't sign something that acknowledges that the citizenship of any children they have is not US citizenship.

4 posted on 08/18/2015 12:13:17 PM PDT by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: grania

it is like child support. It is not the parent’s to waive.

I thought the text regarding the proof and age for obtaining citizenship before 24 was interesting. it neuters this Obama invasion effort.


7 posted on 08/18/2015 12:22:12 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: grania
I'm no lawyer. My take on that sentence is the same as yours. If a person is in the US illegally, they aren't subject to our laws.

So if an illegal alien murders someone, we can't prosecute them?

The "subject to the jurisdiction" language excludes foreign diplomats, who have diplomatic immunity (even if they murder someone).

9 posted on 08/18/2015 12:30:20 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: grania
I'm no lawyer. My take on that sentence is the same as yours. If a person is in the US illegally, they aren't subject to our laws.

That's a sticky subject. I agree that they are not "subject to the jurisdiction of the US", but they ARE subject to our laws. If someone is here illegally and they murder someone, they've committed a violation of TWO laws and should be held accountable for both. However, since they are not "subject to the jurisdiction of the US", they are not afforded the governmental protections provided by said government. They have no right of seeking justice through our laws. In other words, they can be held accountable to the laws that they break when they infringe on the protected rights of legal citizens, but cannot seek those legal privileges for themselves.

That's my $0.02, and I'm no lawyer neither.
11 posted on 08/18/2015 12:33:05 PM PDT by Sopater (Is it not lawful for me to do what I will with mine own? - Matthew 20:15a)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: grania
If a person is in the US illegally, they aren't subject to our laws.

Then they can't be arrested for breaking them?

13 posted on 08/18/2015 12:37:24 PM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: grania; longtermmemmory

The issue of “subject to the laws of the US” deals with persons who are immune to US law, such as those holding diplomatic immunity.

A child born here to a mother and father who both hold diplomatic positions here as representatives of a foreign power is not a US citizen.

It is not about those in the country illegally.


23 posted on 08/18/2015 1:08:20 PM PDT by Crystal Palace East (Are Crybaby Conservatives, calling everyone else RINOs, really Dems trying to get you to not vote?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson