Posted on 08/06/2015 12:07:03 PM PDT by bob_denard
The Obama administration recently made changes to the Oath of Allegiance to the United States in a manner very conducive to Sharia, or Islamic law.
On July 21, the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced some modifications to the Oath of Allegiance which immigrants must take before becoming naturalized.
The original oath required incoming citizens to declare that they will bear arms on behalf of the United States and perform noncombatant service in the Armed Forces of the United States when required by the law.
Now the USCIS says that A candidate [to U.S. citizenship] may be eligible to exclude these two clauses based on religious training and belief or a conscientious objection.
The new changes further add that new candidates May be eligible for [additional?] modifications based on religious training and belief, or conscientious objection arising from a deeply held moral or ethical code.
These changes serve incoming Islamic supremacists especially well. For, while Islamic law allows Muslims to feign loyalty to non-Muslim infidel authorities, it bans Muslims from living up to the pretense by actually fighting or killing fellow Muslims on behalf of a non-Muslim entity, such as the United States.
(Excerpt) Read more at humanevents.com ...
We have taken Muslims into the military and on the fields of battle they assassinated sleeping troops and turned against us in fire-fights. Think about it. I feel it is not a good idea to have them in our armed forces because they think they onlyhave to be loyal to Allah.
We have taken Muslims into the military and on the fields of battle they assassinated sleeping troops and turned against us in fire-fights. Think about it. I feel it is not a good idea to have them in our armed forces because they think they onlyhave to be loyal to Allah.
I'm surprised 0dungo didn't add language stating Muslims promise to take up swords against American citizens!
FUBO!!!!!
And it was never a good idea to have them in our country. Anything beyond very tiny numbers will result in more problems such as this.
But, diversity is our strength.
Now...it’s regulated by a special entity.
Hey no problem, it’s only a refusal to defend the country from attack. /s
And mind you, these are people we are choosing to make new citizens. In other words, dirty leftists and America haters like Obama.
Hopefully the next war will be over whether the trannies use tampons or pads because that’s what matters to Obama.
Every frikken day, it’s something else with this guy. Every frikken day, something new to outrage the American people.
THIS is precisely why Donald Trump is dominating the Republican race. We’re desperate for someone to make it all stop.
Oh, yeah muzzies are all about non-violence.
The worst president in my lifetime and I’m 200+ years old.
Paging Bill O’reilly - hey putz, ready to admit that Obama is a treasonous closet muslim?
Quakers have been doing this for as long as their have been oaths. Not everything is a conspiracy theory.
Actually that is just it...
Has anyone actually brought this forward as a conscientious objection? Or do we dance around a whole lot of other reasons?
Friends (Quakers) have served honorably and well in non-combat roles (mainly medical). This is not the same thing.
How did Muslims become a Politically Correct Victim Group?
Why?
Because the “US” Congress and the “US” State Dept
were paid off, and frankly they both lie
and only care about their own EXEMPT selves.
The country is so PC today that no one in political office or has a public voice can raise these points
The premise is exactly the same thing. I am sure 99.9% of Muslims would serve just as honorably.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.