Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

‘ABYSMAL’ NEW POLL: ‘CLINTON CASH’ HAS DESTROYED HILLARY CLINTON’S CREDIBILITY
Breitart ^ | July 22, 2015 | Staff

Posted on 07/22/2015 12:50:49 PM PDT by lbryce

A new Quinnipiac University poll released on Wednesday confirms that the bombshell revelations from the New York Times bestselling book Clinton Cash have blown a gaping hole in Hillary Clinton’s credibility and trustworthiness—even before a single dollar in negative campaign ads has been spent.

Quinnipiac University Poll assistant director Tim Malloy said Hillary Clinton’s numbers on honesty and trustworthiness “border on abysmal.”

The poll found Clinton losing to Republican presidential candidates Gov. Scott Walker, Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL)80% , and former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush in head-to-head matchups in the key states of Virginia, Colorado, and Iowa.

Since the Clinton Cash revelations of global graft and Clinton Foundation cronyism and personal enrichment rocked Washington, the poll found Iowa voters’ views of Clinton’s trustworthiness and honesty plunging from 45% in April down to 33% today.

In Colorado, 62% of voters said Clinton was not trustworthy and honest, versus just 34% who said she was. Just 39% of Virginia voters view Clinton as honest and trustworthy; 55% say she isn’t.

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; US: Arkansas; US: New York
KEYWORDS: 2016election; arkansas; credibility; election2016; hillary; hillaryclinton; hitlery; newyork; pages; tankin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last
She reportedly has no credibility.But the American people will still vote for her against most politicians. Credibility does't count much for the voters.

How can you tell a politician is lying? Their lips are moving.

1 posted on 07/22/2015 12:50:49 PM PDT by lbryce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JPG; Sarge; Vigilanteman; SERKIT; Talisker; upchuck; Rocky; N. Theknow; hillarynot; laplata

Clinton credibility ping


2 posted on 07/22/2015 12:51:42 PM PDT by lbryce (OBAMA:Misbegotten, GodForsaken, bastard offspring of Satan and Medusa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce
“Why, I'm as poor as a churchmouse.

Yeah, yeah....and uh...

I can't even afford to put a french fry in my mouth.

In fact, I haven't eaten for years!

I have no gas for my car.

I couldn't pay the rent on my very small mansion...er...house...tarpaper shack!

Yeah, that's the ticket!”

3 posted on 07/22/2015 12:53:37 PM PDT by PATRIOT1876
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

Wonder if they still think Bill is so great


4 posted on 07/22/2015 12:55:05 PM PDT by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PATRIOT1876

The Dem’s got away with running a stealth candidate in Obama (assisted by the media). Hillary has a very public record that is absolutely abysmal - especially Libya and the Clinton Family Foundation profiteering. I don’t see how this is supposed to work.


5 posted on 07/22/2015 12:59:02 PM PDT by ghost of nixon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

Between the foundation pay to play rules and the private email servers:

The undecideds have decided.

Against.


6 posted on 07/22/2015 12:59:28 PM PDT by cicero2k
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

This is very easily fixed, all she needs to do is a 3rd re-launch of her campaign...


7 posted on 07/22/2015 12:59:45 PM PDT by fatez (Ya, well, you know, that's just your opinion man...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

So why bother to have a campaign at all?

Just annoint Hillary! and be done with it.


8 posted on 07/22/2015 12:59:54 PM PDT by Arm_Bears (Biology is biology. Everything else is imagination.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

The book didn’t destroy her credibility; just reported her total lack of it.
She destroyed her credibility herself.


9 posted on 07/22/2015 12:59:56 PM PDT by Veto! (Opinions freely dispensed as advice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce


More from Quinnipiac
10 posted on 07/22/2015 1:00:25 PM PDT by BigEdLB (They need to target the 'Ministry of Virtue' which has nothing to do with virtue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PATRIOT1876

Better Call Saul...Alinsky that is.
Oh wait, dirt nap..righto.
Well I’m sure she is in no ways tahd....
-—rolls eyes at the never-ending absurdity of marxists-—


11 posted on 07/22/2015 1:00:27 PM PDT by two23 (Ignore the media. It isn't propaganda if we don't listen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

12 posted on 07/22/2015 1:05:15 PM PDT by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

If she becomes the nominee, 40% of the country is HARD WIRED to vote for her in an electoral map that gives her 70% odds of success. Her numbers may not be impressive in terms of support, but let’s be absolutely clear on one thing: This woman wants the presidency, she will stomp on anything and anyone to get it, and immutably, she has and will have astronomical money to spend on her campaign. She would have to engage in multiple child beheadings, on camera, to change those conditions. And she’d probably pick up just about as many votes as she would lose by doing so, especially if they were abortions.

So don’t count those chickens yet. Trump would possibly beat her but I so seriously doubt he will make it to being nominee. Hillary would IMO destroy Jeb Bush in the biggest electoral embarassment since Mondale. I think she beats any current GOP candidate with the possible exception of Walker and Trump.


13 posted on 07/22/2015 1:07:47 PM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

Most of the Clinton “popularity” is a myth propped up by the Clinton-loving media.


14 posted on 07/22/2015 1:08:06 PM PDT by Fido969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: uncbob

Oh, Slick is great, always will keep his niche as a saint to the orthodoxy that is the Liberal Left in this country. After all, Slick fooled everybody by getting nominated and elected in the first place in 1992, then again when he beat out the rap after he was impeached, but not removed from office in 1999.

But Herself, Madame Benghazi, the Cold & Joyless, did not have much of that sainthood transferred to Herself. Time after time, Herself demonstrated rather conclusively that Slick had an untouchability factor on almost every important aspect. Herself, on the other hand, was engaged in endless and repeated lapsed judgment, beginning YEARS before ever arriving in Washington as First Lady, and stretching right into the Senate years and the Secretary of State term.


15 posted on 07/22/2015 1:11:41 PM PDT by alloysteel (If Stupidity got us into this mess, then why can't it get us out? - Will Rogers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: lbryce
the bombshell revelations from the New York Times bestselling book Clinton Cash have blown a gaping hole in Hillary Clinton’s credibility and trustworthiness

Impossible. She had none to begin with


16 posted on 07/22/2015 1:11:58 PM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce
"Fokes, pleez hep me. Ah cain't even afford dead broke Hillary Clinton photo: Dead Broke DeadBroke.jpg no bottle a Vagisil. Dat dam Trump ... "
17 posted on 07/22/2015 1:14:37 PM PDT by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

Maybe it’s too late for the crooked ones to make a comeback. Although she may pull it off if she can throw him a state funeral within a year. Those wellstones do rally the rabble.


18 posted on 07/22/2015 1:15:10 PM PDT by Buttons12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

she never had any credibility

The only reason she was not in jail over Whitewater or the Cattle Futures or the Rose Law Firm scandal(s) is that she was married to Bill Clinton.


19 posted on 07/22/2015 1:21:06 PM PDT by Mr. K (If it is HilLIARy -vs- Jeb! then I am writing-in Palin/Cruz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

Donald Trump would be making a big mistake if he knocked Hillary? out too early. As things stand, she is essentially a shoe-in for the democratic nomination. The only thing that could change that is if the party infrastructure abandoned her, which they won’t do for the fake Indian, the real socialist, or the irrelevancy from MD. But if Trump started landing knock-out blows on the Hillary? campaign, which he could easily do, he may force the democrat parties’ hand.

He beats Hillary? easily in the general, should it come to that. The left will do everything they can to derail Trump, because, if they do, then Bush wins the nomination and gets destroyed by Hillary!, credibility issues notwithstanding.


20 posted on 07/22/2015 1:22:35 PM PDT by jjsheridan5 (The next Ronald Reagan will not be a Republican, but rather a former Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson