Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

TRUMP: DEM AGENT PROVOCATEUR STRUTTING IN OPEN SIGHT
FoxRadio.com ^ | July 17, 2015 | John Gibson

Posted on 07/22/2015 2:25:26 AM PDT by GoneSalt

I'm feeling a bit Onion-y today and consequently I must offer a explanation–a theory–about what we are seeing these days in this hallucinogenic political season.

Now that Donald Trump has taken the lead in the latest Fox poll, it’s time to call this perverse reality show for what it really is.

Trump is working for his friend Hillary Clinton’s landslide election.

(Excerpt) Read more at radio.foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Canada; Editorial; Front Page News; Mexico; Political Humor/Cartoons; Politics/Elections; Russia; US: Arizona; US: California; US: Florida; US: New Hampshire; US: New York; US: South Carolina; US: Texas; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 2016election; arizona; benghazi; california; canada; clintoncash; clintonfoundation; election2016; embarcadero; fox; foxradio; franciscosanchez; gibson; hillaryclinton; hitlery; iran; johnmccain; kathrynsteinle; libya; lindseygraham; mexico; newyork; pages; peterschweizer; rickperry; russia; sanfrancisco; senatorjohnmccain; senatormccain; southcarolina; texas; tinfoiledagain; tinfoilery; treygowdy; trollbait; trump; uranium; waronterror
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 next last
To: GoneSalt; SunkenCiv

For sure DT believes that he will win, but in effect he is strengthening the position of HC


21 posted on 07/22/2015 7:05:52 AM PDT by AdmSmith (GCTGATATGTCTATGATTACTCAT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TNMOUTH

>> The one adversely affected seems to be Cruz <<

Certainly. And if Trump keeps draining supporters from Cruz, the GOP’s final selection may boil down to a choice among Bush, Walker, Rubio and Cruz.


22 posted on 07/22/2015 7:18:24 AM PDT by Hawthorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Martin Tell

Trump may be a lot of things — good and bad — but calling him a “baffoon” shows clearly you seriously underestimate the man. Never a good thing to do, even if you despise the person.


23 posted on 07/22/2015 7:21:54 AM PDT by glennaro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

It’s mestastasizing.


24 posted on 07/22/2015 7:29:21 AM PDT by TADSLOS (A Ted Cruz Happy Warrior! GO TED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: GoneSalt

Ridiculous article.


25 posted on 07/22/2015 7:34:15 AM PDT by Albion Wilde (If you can't make a deal with a politician, you can't make a deal. --Donald Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith
For sure DT believes that he will win, but in effect he is strengthening the position of HC

No, he's not. He's cleaning out the GOPe.

26 posted on 07/22/2015 7:35:48 AM PDT by Albion Wilde (If you can't make a deal with a politician, you can't make a deal. --Donald Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: TADSLOS

Criticizing Trump is not metastasis.

Being a jerk about it, now THAT is metastasis.

Hawthorn didn’t do that.


27 posted on 07/22/2015 7:35:53 AM PDT by Lazamataz ("In a very short period of time, these will be the good old days." -- unknown Freeper, 2015)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Hawthorn

How do you figure that? If he caused Cruz to lose support, wouldn’t Trump be in that final group?


28 posted on 07/22/2015 7:54:49 AM PDT by TNMOUTH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: GoneSalt
I though I had heard it all when it came to conspiracy theories.

But this one takes the cake.

29 posted on 07/22/2015 8:17:47 AM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18 - Be The Leaderless Resistance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GoneSalt

John Gibson has no credibility. He is spewing nonsense.


30 posted on 07/22/2015 8:24:46 AM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose o f a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GoneSalt

Listening to talk radio this morning, they were saying Christie was the man to beat Trump...LOL.


31 posted on 07/22/2015 9:35:43 AM PDT by jacknhoo (Luke 12:51. Think ye, that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, no; but separation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TNMOUTH

>> If he caused Cruz to lose support, wouldn’t Trump be in that final group? <<

Sure. But if the primary “marathon” eventually boils down to Trump versus Bush, Trump versus Rubio, or Trump versus Walker, then the non-Trump is sure to win.

Cruz would almost surely beat Trump in a one-on-one contest, but as the polls look now, I think it’s a real stretch to imagine that Cruz could rise to be among the top three.


32 posted on 07/22/2015 10:05:30 AM PDT by Hawthorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: jacknhoo
Listening to talk radio this morning, they were saying Christie was the man to beat Trump...LOL.

Yup, he's the man to beat Trump . . . to a Dunkin Donuts grand opening.

33 posted on 07/22/2015 11:25:01 AM PDT by King of Florida (A little government and a little luck are necessary in life, but only a fool trusts either of them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: glennaro

Would “Vulgarian” be more to your liking?


34 posted on 07/22/2015 11:34:07 AM PDT by Martin Tell (Victrix causa diis placuit sed victa Catoni.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Martin Tell

Not really — he’s not vulgar (although the bullies attacking are). How ‘bout “provacateur” — it accurately describes his tactics — and clearly his intent — and it provides those intimidated by his “non-professional politician” demeanor with a needed negative connotation. Fair enough, good sir?


35 posted on 07/22/2015 11:39:27 AM PDT by glennaro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Hawthorn

We are a year out as people remind us.

Why do you think Trump would lose in one of those contests? I can see him losing to walker...but Bush?


36 posted on 07/22/2015 12:01:50 PM PDT by TNMOUTH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: glennaro
I think "provacateur" probably gives him too much credit, though I will agree that he is trying to provoke, and his opponents are too dim to see they are merely giving him what he wants with their responses.

I will have to stick with "vulgarian." This definition, from dictionary.reference.com, seems to fit very well: "noun. a vulgar person, especially one whose vulgarity is the more conspicuous because of wealth, prominence, or pretensions to good breeding."

While I think we can respectfully disagree, I will never vote for Trump. If it's Trump versus Hillary, I will vote third party.

37 posted on 07/22/2015 12:02:34 PM PDT by Martin Tell (Victrix causa diis placuit sed victa Catoni.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: TNMOUTH

>> Why do you think Trump would lose in one of those contests? I can see him losing to walker...but Bush? <<

In the first place, I doubt Trump has the “staying power” that’s necessary for remaining competitive over the next 12 months. Even if he doesn’t himself get bored with the primary process after he has had his current moments of glory, I’ll bet that a lot of his potential supporters will eventually get awfully bored with his boorish behavior.

In the second place, the poll data I’ve seen show that even though Trump now leads the GOP field, his disapproval percentages among the GOP electorate are higher than his approval percentages. That’s not exactly a winning formula for a two-man race.

In the third place, even though the expressions of anti-Bush sentiment on FR are extremely powerful and widespread, I don’t think FR is representative of the GOP electorate as a whole. If matters ever came down to Bush vs. Trump, I think the electorate-cum-primary process that selected McCain and Romney would eventually go for Bush.

(But put me down as a strong Walker fan!)


38 posted on 07/22/2015 1:38:47 PM PDT by Hawthorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Martin Tell

>> If it’s Trump versus Hillary, I will vote third party <<

I’d wager that the only way it could be Trump vs. Hillary would be if Trump is a third-party standard bearer.


39 posted on 07/22/2015 1:43:10 PM PDT by Hawthorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Martin Tell; glennaro
>> I think "provacateur" probably gives him too much credit <<

What about a vulgarian provacateur?

40 posted on 07/22/2015 1:46:11 PM PDT by Hawthorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson