Posted on 06/06/2015 8:55:03 AM PDT by Perseverando
No-—there probably was more boys in the child sex ring than girls.....all the news is about perceptions only-—never the truth. They always control the perceptions of the masses.
The Truth is that all sex rings-—the masses of molested children have always been boys-—since ancient times. That is why we have the anal sex grooming of kindergarteners now and forcing sodomy and bestiality in our military. It is grooming of boys and normalizing evil. (Justice is the Queen of Virtue and all Just Law is supposed to promote Virtue always-—and sodomizing others is always an irrational, vile, purposeless, unnatural vice until the homofascist took over schools and media 24/7 to destroy Christian Worldview (so we can kill the useless eaters (Marxism).).
To destroy Virtue in children, they have to normalize the vile degrading behavior by normalizing “homosexual marriage” so it is normalized in every children-—not just the public school indoctrinated ones—even Christians and homeschooled children. Homosexuality is always learned like in the boy harems in AFghanistsn. The filthy little “secret” is that it is the boys that the Lucifereans want—it always is about the pretty little boys. Girls are just sodomized like the boys ( Roman Polansky)-—like the Bohemian Grove Kissinger type goat-god worshippers-—if they do use girls in their sex rings.
IT all goes back to the worship of Ba’al and the mocking of God/Chistiainity which equates Life to Excrement (homosexuality). It is essential to dominate and emasculate boys for their “happy slavery”.....boys like the Afghanis have collectivist minds-—group thinkers (emotional only).
I guess you've made the connection that the Larry King is your post's full name is Lawrence King, maybe the same Lawrence King mentioned as being a Haster associate in the late 1979s.
He's claiming specific memory as to whom he was introduced to.
Another book on the Franklin scandal. I downloaded this one for Kindle since it was very cheap. “The Franklin Cover-up” for $3.44 Kindle edition.
http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_noss_2?url=search-alias%3Daps&field-keywords=Franklin+scandal
Conceivably, Bucceroni could be wrong about the date, but doesn't that make the idea of a specific memory a little shakier? Why is this only surfacing now?
Hastert is dead to me, but this story doesn't quite pass the smell test, at least for me.
People who want to run for Congress in the future often start trying to establish contacts in DC beforehand. And, he ran for the Illinois House in 1980 and lost, then in 1981, he won a seat vacated by a terminally ill legislator.
So politics was obviously on his mind in the late '70s. At present, not a lot has been established or refuted concerning this very new story, but with what is already known, it's pretty knee-jerk to dismiss anything out-of-hand until much more investigation has taken place.
But the fact that Bucceroni has already tried to connect his own abusers to Jerry Sandusky and a Nebraska credit union and who knows what else doesn't make him the most reliable of accusers.
Because he was a sex traffic victim himself and was at the party where he recognized the sex traffics in attendance at the party. He witnessed Hastert socializing with “known sex trafficers”
He knows nothing, he saw nothing he is jumping on whatever bandwagon that there is for whatever reason.
I have no idea of where the child molest stories came from, but for the gov't to investigate anyone for how they handle their own money is outrageous at the LEAST.
For anybody to pay over 3 million to a blackmailer, there has to be something really bad, whatever it is.
Duh....pay attention, they are going to get right on that when climate change causes Hell to freeze over.....could be soon maybe.
how can ANYBODY be stupid enough to blackmail a person who can come up with that kind of money.......I might try a one time threat for a few hundred thousand.....but I would realize that he could pay one of Obama's sons a hell of a lot less just to make me disappear and no one would know the difference.
.
>> “Why the HELL didn’t he speak up DECADES AGO???? What is going on???” <<
.
He was being paid hush money.
Maybe the money stopped...
.
>> “but I haven’t heard anything specific.” <<
Does that surprise you?
Prosecutors do not spill their beans on the public sidewalk.
Your bias is outrageous.
.
U Bet!
And Hastert was one of the worst speakers we have ever had.
Well it is obvious that he was one of the worst speakers we ever had because the Clintons illegally had over 400 Private FBI files on all the elected officials and others in Washington.
.
>> “I’ll take it a step further with this guy. If some story came out about child sexual abuse on GW’s boat crossing the Delaware, he would somehow place himself there.” <<
.
You’ve just defecated on what little cred you may have had.
.
Why??
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.