Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GOP hopefuls criticize Obama marijuana policy but hedge on their own
The Washington Times ^ | April 1, 2015 | Seth McLaughlin

Posted on 04/02/2015 10:26:36 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Republican presidential hopefuls are united in blasting President Obama for his chaotic enforcement of marijuana laws, but the unity quickly breaks down when they are asked how they would handle things if they were in the White House.

Some have sent mixed signals, saying state decisions should be respected while questioning how Mr. Obama has respected those decisions. Others have refused to say how they would wield the federal bureaucracy against marijuana.

Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal is one of the few potential candidates to take a firm stance, saying he would insist on following federal statutes that outlaw the drug.

“I don’t think you can ignore federal law,” Mr. Jindal told radio talk show host Hugh Hewitt, who asked whether the governor would “bring the hammer” down on pot stores in states with legalization laws. “Federal law is still the law of the land. It still needs to be enforced.”

The confusion stems from the conflict between federal law, which classifies marijuana as a Schedule I drug on par with heroin and LSD, and states where pot has been legalized for medicinal use or, in a growing number of states, where it has been approved for recreational use.

Twenty-three states and the District of Columbia have legalized medical marijuana. Alaska, Oregon and the District also have followed in the footsteps of Colorado and Washington by allowing recreational use of the drug. Several other states, such as California, Maine, Arizona and Nevada, which hosts an early presidential nomination contest, are heading in a similar direction.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Extended News; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections; US: Alabama; US: Alaska; US: Arizona; US: Arkansas; US: California; US: Colorado; US: District of Columbia; US: Florida; US: Kentucky; US: Louisiana; US: Maine; US: Nevada; US: New Jersey; US: Oregon; US: Pennsylvania; US: Texas; US: Washington; US: Wisconsin
KEYWORDS: abortion; alabama; alaska; arizona; arkansas; bobbyjindal; california; cannabis; chrischristie; colorado; deathpanels; districtofcolumbia; dontbogartthatjoint; election2016; federallaw; florida; gaymarriage; gop; homosexualagenda; hughhewitt; jebbush; kentucky; legalization; libertarians; louisiana; maine; marcorubio; marijuana; medicalmarijuana; mikehuckabee; nannystate; nevada; newjersey; norml; obamacare; oregon; pennsylvania; pot; randpaul; randsconcerntrolls; rickperry; ricksantorum; scottwalker; states; tedcruz; texas; washington; wisconsin; wod; zerocare
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last
To: wolfman23601
legalizing marijuana at the federal level, which is his actual position

Not that I'm disagreeing, but on what do you base this conclusion?

21 posted on 04/03/2015 8:56:49 AM PDT by ConservingFreedom (A government strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ConservingFreedom

His stated position, as per the article, is that it is up to states like Washington and Colorado to set these policies. Another way of saying that is there shouldn’t be a federal law.


22 posted on 04/03/2015 9:41:04 AM PDT by wolfman23601
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

As far as I am concerned, legalize it. But ANY offense under MJ influence is subject to a 2x-3x harsher penalty as an aggravating factor.


23 posted on 04/03/2015 9:45:33 AM PDT by MortMan (All those in favor of gun control raise both hands!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...

24 posted on 04/03/2015 11:01:35 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (What do we want? REGIME CHANGE! When do we want it? NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

25 posted on 04/03/2015 12:03:00 PM PDT by ConservingFreedom (A government strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: MortMan
ANY offense under MJ influence is subject to a 2x-3x harsher penalty as an aggravating factor.

Same policy for alcohol?

26 posted on 04/03/2015 12:03:41 PM PDT by ConservingFreedom (A government strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: ConservingFreedom

That’s cool, it’s a great industry in which to be a salesman.


27 posted on 04/03/2015 12:18:02 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (What do we want? REGIME CHANGE! When do we want it? NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: ConservingFreedom

Absolutely.

BUT - I would also add that “we were drunk/stoned and had sex without being forced, and I regret it, so he raped me” must become a laughable charge at least, and a punishable charge in probable reality.


28 posted on 04/03/2015 1:18:23 PM PDT by MortMan (All those in favor of gun control raise both hands!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson