Skip to comments.
House Republicans resist call to change course on DHS funding
The Hill ^
| 02/11/2015
| Rebecca Shabad and Cristina Marcos
Posted on 02/11/2015 11:12:19 AM PST by GIdget2004
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
To: GIdget2004
Shut it down. It is not like DHS is actually securing the homeland anyways.
2
posted on
02/11/2015 11:16:27 AM PST
by
jospehm20
To: GIdget2004
Weenies.
They have an excuse for doing nothing forever.
3
posted on
02/11/2015 11:17:41 AM PST
by
Uncle Miltie
(Bush / Clinton 2016! Clinton / Bush 2020! Uniparty Rules!)
To: GIdget2004
Okayyyy......so because the minority dems won't back down and reverse the invasion of the US, the majority Republicans are supposed to?
Only a traitor or an idiot would think that makes any sense. Close the government....just this time insist that the self-sufficient parks and monuments stay open. And defund AF1
4
posted on
02/11/2015 11:19:48 AM PST
by
grania
To: GIdget2004
I thought the Dems did away with the Senate filibustering rules........no?
5
posted on
02/11/2015 11:20:07 AM PST
by
originalbuckeye
(Moderation in temper is always a virtue; moderation in principle is always a vice. Paine)
To: GIdget2004
Just deem it passed.
6
posted on
02/11/2015 11:20:21 AM PST
by
grobdriver
(Where is Wilson Blair when you need him?)
To: jospehm20
Don’t we already pay for something called...”The Dept. Of Defense”?
7
posted on
02/11/2015 11:21:45 AM PST
by
RckyRaCoCo
(Shall Not Be Infringed)
To: GIdget2004
Funding the DHS is simply PI$$ING money away in record amounts.
To: GIdget2004
smother the constituents of recalcitrant senators with info re their folly, asking them to apply pressure to pass the House bill.
9
posted on
02/11/2015 11:24:05 AM PST
by
elpadre
(AfganistaMr Obama said the goal was to "disrupt, dismantle and defeat al-hereQaeda" and its allies.)
To: GIdget2004
Hmmm. It was my impression that appropriations couldn't be filibustered. Isn't that the way the rats got Obamacare passed? I must have something wrong.
10
posted on
02/11/2015 11:25:54 AM PST
by
Jacquerie
(Article V. If not now, when?)
To: GIdget2004
A republican controlled Congress that does nothing about Obamas obvious in your face INSURRECTION...
IS.......... VICHY.......... a mirage.. bad cop good cop..
A ......... CONSPIRACY........
AND should be called what it is....... sedition and TREASON... maybe even ESPIONAGE... a Potemkin Village..
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Potemkin_village
11
posted on
02/11/2015 11:26:29 AM PST
by
hosepipe
(" This propaganda has been edited (specifically) to include some fully orbed hyperbole.. ")
To: Jacquerie
Hmmm. It was my impression that appropriations couldn't be filibustered. Isn't that the way the rats got Obamacare passed? I must have something wrong. Yes. You have it wrong.
Only conservative issues and agendas can be filibustered.
Progressive, socialist, or communist issues and agendas are totally filibuster-proofed.
12
posted on
02/11/2015 11:28:13 AM PST
by
Lazamataz
(With friends like Boehner, we don't need Democrats. -- Laz A. Mataz, 2015)
To: GIdget2004
McConnell is a piece of crap. And many of the Republicans in the Senate are garbage and will not do a damn thing to upset King Obams. Much of America has been destroyed by a out of control Federal communists controlled Government.
To: GIdget2004
It doesn’t even matter if the RINO’s have a majority they couldn’t find their a$$ in a lighted room with both hands.
14
posted on
02/11/2015 11:29:12 AM PST
by
Rappini
(Veritas Vos Liberabit)
To: Jacquerie
Budgetary bills can be forced through by simple majority under reconciliation.
This is an Appropriations (actual funding) bill, which is different. I don’t think reconciliation applies.
To: GIdget2004
16
posted on
02/11/2015 11:33:03 AM PST
by
hosepipe
(" This propaganda has been edited (specifically) to include some fully orbed hyperbole.. ")
To: GIdget2004
Why not just extend the “Reid Rule” to finance bills? Appropriation bills originate in the House, so it makes more sense than what Reid did. 51 votes and done.
17
posted on
02/11/2015 11:36:10 AM PST
by
Sooth2222
("In a democracy people get the leaders they deserve." - Joseph de Maistre, 1753-1821)
To: GIdget2004
Harry Reid - if her Senate GOP leader - would get the legislation approved by the Senate with 51 votes, but McConnel thinks he’ll be rewarded in heaven for not playing politics, not fighting for what his party wants, like Harry Reid did. He is dead wrong in thinking he improves the public image of the GOP or his conference in the Senate by playing nice the way the Democrats never do.
18
posted on
02/11/2015 11:36:29 AM PST
by
Wuli
To: GIdget2004
"They lamented the frustration they're having getting up to 60 votes."Why does that moron McConnell need 60 votes? The dims didn't.
19
posted on
02/11/2015 11:38:24 AM PST
by
matthew fuller
(Brian Williams speaks with crooked face.)
To: GIdget2004
Clearly the DHS is complicit (up to it's ears) in aiding the illegal alien problem we have in the US. Why on earth should we tax payers sit back and keep allowing these corrupted bastards in DC that allows the DHS and the obozo administration to continue to tare apart this country by flooding it with those who have as much loyalty to our constitution and the US as those in DC have, which is none? Common sense will tell anyone that once the US is gone, its gone for good and if something doesn't change in DC and soon, for certain it will be gone by Jan 20, 2017.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson