[Jim Robinson]

Obama: We don't need no steenkin' congress.

[petro45acp]

Another domino falls!

KYPD

[MeshugeMikey]

I sense that there will be a number of ways to Tax....this Utility....

[vetvetdoug]

The day the Internet becomes a public utility regulated by the rectal openings in D.C. is the day I quit using it.

[MarineBrat]

These wads are begging to be hacked by White Hats now.

[Democrat_media]

Obama wants to “regulate”,censor and ruin the Internet. The leftists want to control all the information the people are to recieve

[Opinionated Blowhard]

new rules, proposed this week, to preserve the Internet as an open platform for innovation and free expression

New government regulations to preserve freedom? Orwell would be proud.

[PapaNew]

Constitution: we don’t need no steenkin’ FCC.

[Major Matt Mason]

Net neutrality may be a worthy concept, but the problem as always is that the Left has hijacked this issue. the chances that we will now have censorship on the Internet has just increased ten-fold with this "ruling".

[Marie Antoinette]

They are going to UTTERLY RUIN it! I have so much contempt for these busybodies!!

[AU72]

What could possibly go wrong with this!?

[lee martell]

I still need to learn what, exactly, does NET NEUTRALITY mean? That is an innocuous phrase , a contrived description that could mean anything.

I just want to know if the new label will increase the price for the same bandwidth, and if so, by how much? I also want to know if a customer says ‘no
, they do not want their history collected or their geographic location known, will we still have that choice, or has the choice of staying private always been an illusion?

[skeeter]

‘Vere are your internet papers, please?’

[isthisnickcool]

Cruz/Walker 2016

[GeronL]

the beginning of the end of freedom online

[Shadow44]

“You know how the internet has blossomed and flourished for the past 30 years on its own? Well, it’s about time we killed it with censorship and regulation.”

[CGASMIA68]

how does the FCC regulate that which does not terminate in the CONUS

[Political Junkie Too]

Although the internet began as a loose connection of government and university servers, it has grown way beyond that to be mostly private-sector business servers now, right?

So wouldn't this ruling by the FCC be essentially nationalizing the internet by effectively seizing control of private property in the name of business servers and fiber optic cables?

Shouldn't there be at least a Fifth Amendment takings issue here?

-PJ

[lexington minuteman 1775]

I had an idea to bounce around on FREE REPUBLIC. How about the GOP passes legislation thru both the House and Senate and say its something OBAMA has said he would veto. Well don’t send it to him. Say its an EXECUTIVE ACT OF CONGRESS. When WH says thats not on Consitution say well neither are most of your EO’s...force a court fight over it since they seem to spineless to impeach or even charge him with sedtion for obviously being on the side of the jihadists who are our enemies.
Freegards
LEX

[Biggirl]

Look for this to land up in the fed courts.

[RedMDer]

DEFUND IT!