Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

‘Selma’ distorts the truth about LBJ
Washington Post ^ | January 5, 2015 | By Richard Cohen

Posted on 01/06/2015 9:41:34 AM PST by Brad from Tennessee

Before I came to dislike the movie “Selma,” I was deeply moved by it. Twice it brought me to tears. A crane shot of Martin Luther King Jr. leading thousands of demonstrators over the Edmund Pettus Bridge was one such moment, and so was the vicious attack on John Lewis — bravely, steadfastly walking into the beating he knew was coming. Today, Lewis is a member of Congress. Forever, he’ll be an American hero.

Too bad, though, that the movie had to go Hollywood on Lyndon Baines Johnson, who, as if from the grave, has bellowed his protest. In its need for some dramatic tension, “Selma” asserts that King had to persuade and pressure a recalcitrant Johnson to introduce the Voting Rights Act of 1965. The movie also depicts Johnson authorizing FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover to smear King and — as King himself suspected — try to drive him to suicide. It is a profoundly ugly moment.

But a bevy of historians say it never happened. It was Robert F. Kennedy, the former attorney general, who authorized the FBI’s bugging of King’s hotel rooms. Yet, for understandable reasons, Kennedy appears nowhere in the film. By 1965, he was no longer the AG and, anyway, he remains a liberal icon. But LBJ — Southern, obscene and, especially when compared to the lithe Kennedy, gross of speech and physique — was made the heavy. He should get a posthumous SAG card. . . .

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial
KEYWORDS: blacks; civilrights; hollywood; hoover; jedgarhoover; johnson; kennedy; lbj; libmyths; mlkjr; moviereview; rfk; selma
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-190 next last
To: Brad from Tennessee

Hollyweird should have made King white.


41 posted on 01/06/2015 10:19:25 AM PST by bgill (CDC site, "we still do not know exactly how people are infected with Ebola")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FredZarguna

A film like this (or something like ‘Lawrence of Arabia’ for example) should be taken in the same light as Shakespeare’s history plays. There are also anachronisms in Shakespeare that both he and his audience were well aware of. ‘Meet Me in St Louis’ is an American classic and goes well beyond the pretentious moron demographic.


42 posted on 01/06/2015 10:19:59 AM PST by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee

LBJ was a leftist radical. Michael King, aka Martin Luther King jr. was an even more hardlined communist radical than LBJ. I do not understand the idol worship of MLK.


43 posted on 01/06/2015 10:21:23 AM PST by Organic Panic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AEMILIUS PAULUS

“King’s masters brought the war to our shores. After fifty years of unremitting attacks We are losing.”

What war did King bring to our shores?

Was it the Vietnam War? Can you point to incidences where MLK brought VietCong to attack America on our shores?


44 posted on 01/06/2015 10:22:03 AM PST by Oliviaforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

I think LBJ could have found many more boxes with ballots for him. Something else kept him from running.


45 posted on 01/06/2015 10:22:12 AM PST by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee
[Article, weeping for the ineffable LBJ] :

He should get a posthumous SAG card. . . .

Yeah. Signed by Dalton Trumbo. And Will Geer.

46 posted on 01/06/2015 10:22:58 AM PST by lentulusgracchus ("If America was a house, the Left would root for the termites." - Greg Gutfeld)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grania; Borges
You're absolutely right, and someone trying to defend this as a "dramatic technique" is completely wrong. It's like defending Uri Geller on the basis of the idea that conjurors used his kinds of tricks all the time. James Randi, a real magician among the several who exposed him, would have none of it: You're not an entertainer if you perform magic but claim you have psychic powers. You're a charlatan, plain and simple.

These race-based dramas are put forth as if they're actual history, and deserve criticism as such. Most of the idiots who go to see this film will come away from it -- just as they did from Oliver Stone's wildly [insanely] ahistorical JFK -- as if they've learned something about history. They haven't.

No one engaging in this kind of historical malpractice deserves a pass on "artistic" grounds.

47 posted on 01/06/2015 10:23:44 AM PST by FredZarguna (O, Reason not the need.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: FredZarguna

Nobody with any sense should be taking this or any drama as a historical document. Strict adherence to historical record is not a criteria for drama and has never been at any time in the history of western civilization.


48 posted on 01/06/2015 10:25:59 AM PST by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: GrandJediMasterYoda

“Yes no doubt slaves were abused like that, but not on the scale that movie portrayed.”

I think we can agree, that by definition, slaves were abused each and every day that they were held in slavery as one cannot be a slave without being abused.


49 posted on 01/06/2015 10:26:14 AM PST by Oliviaforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Organic Panic
I do not understand the idol worship of MLK.

MLK is the prototype for Al Sharpton.


50 posted on 01/06/2015 10:29:37 AM PST by Iron Munro (Conservative Epitaph: Don't Cry For Me , You Still Have Two More Years Of Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee

Sadly, this movie will become “official” history for those who see it.


51 posted on 01/06/2015 10:29:41 AM PST by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee
Well it was Republicans pushing that until Johnson saw they were going to lose a voting block, then the Democrats got on board somewhat and still a higher percentage of Republicans voted for civil rights than did Democrats..
Then he did welfare and is recorded saying that this would make the nigg@rs vote Democrat for two hundred years.
52 posted on 01/06/2015 10:29:45 AM PST by A CA Guy ( God Bless America, God Bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I cannot think of a name

Carter actually wasn’t a bad president.

Its only AFTER his time in the White House that he became a deranged old fool.

“although you can be certain he will be a democrap.”

I agree, but there are plenty of FReepers who will argue that No. The Worst Ever President was in fact a Republican.

Hint. He was the first Republican President.


53 posted on 01/06/2015 10:30:02 AM PST by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Organic Panic

I’ve never seen any evidence he was a communist. Rumors, but no evidence.


54 posted on 01/06/2015 10:30:38 AM PST by bigdaddy45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Borges
Wrong, as usual.

If it's [mis]represented as history, it can be criticized on that basis.

Meet Me in St. Louis is a musical. Like all musicals, it appeals to morons. So its demographic includes both the pretentious, and the nonpretentious kinds.

55 posted on 01/06/2015 10:31:26 AM PST by FredZarguna (O, Reason not the need.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Iron Munro

The 1964 Election was a critical moment in American electoral politics and that that moment was defined by Barry Goldwater opposing the Civil Rights Act and then getting the GOP nomination the same year.

Had Goldwater or the GOP nominee supported the Civil Rights Act in 1964, blacks would not be voting 90% for the Democratic Party.


56 posted on 01/06/2015 10:31:58 AM PST by Oliviaforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee
LBJ is the reason churches, well conservative ones anyone, aren't allowed to comment on government and campaigns.

I'm not sure how anyone could paint this loser in any positive way.

57 posted on 01/06/2015 10:32:19 AM PST by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salamander

Oh, I am SO STEALING THIS!!!


58 posted on 01/06/2015 10:32:37 AM PST by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Save and bookmark.

keywords: LBJ VOTING DEMOCRATIC 200 YEARS

59 posted on 01/06/2015 10:32:49 AM PST by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy

It was all Goldwater’s fault.


60 posted on 01/06/2015 10:34:12 AM PST by Oliviaforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-190 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson