Posted on 10/13/2014 2:24:23 PM PDT by PROCON
Only a madman would gamble with our lives…our children’s lives…and the entire American economy. Why would President Obama play “Russian Roulette” with the future of our country? It’s a gamble no sane leader would take.
The life and death issue is Ebola. The President is more concerned with political correctness (and golf) than taking common sense precautions to prevent a deadly pandemic. Why does this President not see his responsibility is to keep the odds as low as possible?
There are three simple, common sense actions any President who cared about American citizens would take:
(Excerpt) Read more at townhall.com ...
The EXEMPT Boehner:
"Ignore them all, my most sacred and beloved King."
"Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction.
We didn't pass it to our children in the bloodstream.
It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same,
or one day we will spend our sunset years telling our children
and our children's children what it was once like in the United States where men were free."
President Ronald Reagan
Too busy running for office.
The problem is .. you end up with Biden who is even worse!
Try telling that to the families of the sick and dying children now stricken with EV-D68 in more than 40 states where Obama has shipped 37,000+ UACs! So far ebola is just a distraction from this menace. Those disease-ridden illegal alien kids are now in our public school system. This crap is just getting started.
Yep, and that’s why Clinton skated after his terms ended. Rove was right in there explaining to Bush why it would be a bad idea to go after him.
The vandalism by the White House staff alone, should have had some of them brought up on charges.
Saying it and doing it are two different things.
Not going to happen with this GOP.
A picture is worth a thousand words.
The dems would never go along with it because there’s so much intrigue from hillaristas and others who’d rather run against the Obama presidency than to have Biden be president for a few years and maybe have someone develop some leadership.
It is not going to happen. There are too many RINOs in the Senate to get 60 votes.
Yes. A President Biden is far more preferable
Stupid as a rock and very liberal, but far less agenda-driven. Might actually protect Americans because that’s what leaders are supposed to do.
I think a dozen+ democrats in the Senate might go along with the 54 republicans that will be in the Senate this January, especially if Trey Gowdy can make hay on his invstigation into Benghazi or Issa gets his hands on the F&F documents.
#1) Ban all flights from the Ebola Zone and quarantine all travelers coming from any Ebola Zone...
#2) Secure and seal the border- NOW...
#3) Return all U.S. troops from the Ebola Zone
That would require 80 "Republican" Senators
John?!? Nope, he doesn't GAF
Hey Boehner?!? Nevermind, he's drunk.
Thad? Thad Cochran?!? Dammit man, it's nap time.
I give up...
They must have something incredibly hugh planned for a Repuglican/E takeover of the senate . . .
LOLOLOLOLOOBOLA
Is President Obama capable of making decisions? He failed in the Benghazi incident and four lives were lost. Is he in touch with reality? Anyone in any state of mind can read a prompter.
Biden was a pretty leftist Senator with an agenda in the old days
Not if you live in Mississippi and I don't give a damn what anybody says. Thad Cochran can go to hell with his live in mistress.
I would love to have some mini stickers of these and post them everywhere: gas pumps, bathroom stall walls etc.
They asked for it, and look what they got!
But, but Mitt would have been worse.
Right?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.