Posted on 06/30/2014 8:45:22 AM PDT by wagglebee
Edited on 06/30/2014 9:10:49 AM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
WARNING: OBSCENE LANGUAGE
The Supreme Court has ruled on behalf of Hobby Lobby against ObamaCare mandating them to pay for at least four drugs they deem abortive which would violate their religious freedoms!
According to experts, the 5 to 4 decision applies to “closely-held” corporations. It may not apply to all companies or to all contraception-more details to follow…
Following the ruling, Twitter filled up with treats to burn Hobby Lobby to the ground.
Shows the true side of the “tolerant left” and so-called “pro-choice” community!
More at Twitchy http://twitchy.com/2014/06/30/fuk-you-left-wingers-want-to-burn-down-hobby-lobby-after-scotus-win/
LifeNews Note: Carole Novielli is the author of the blog Saynsumthn, where this article originally appeared.
Hobby lobby knew this would happen- the threats, anyway
They are very brave for fighting this and the decision is far reaching. And the pushback will still be there
Absolutely. Honest and direct question: Has anyone ever advocated for such extreme violence here on FR, or even on Twitter, when something hasn't gone our way politically? I honestly can't recall seeing anything like this from any conservative.
These people are behaving like animals. Absolute de-humanization, of themselves! It's truly symptomatic of our corrupted culture.
Note the obscene language warning at the beginning.
How can anyone clean up language from these uneducated, classless, lazy dopes?
Maybe they can recruit Bill Ayers!
For those people who are atheists; just take a look the hatred displayed against Christians like this; and tell me there isn’t evil in the world.
We can’t clean up their language; their hatred.
But must we give credibility to them and their filthy language by repeating it?
How very gratuitous of us.
It only takes one.
Small groups of committed radicals can cause a whole lot of damage.
The arson time bombs used by the 1960’s radicals aren’t that hard to make and they are very small.
Can’t expect people who rabidly defend the immoral practice of abortion to have morals in anything else.
Thanks for the ping.
Such ‘gentle’ people... /s
better get more insurance
I always love their reaction when things don’t go their way.
As if they’d ever deign to work there or shop there.
These people act as if the Supreme court had told them they had to stop murdering babies.
All this angry vitriol because some women may have to pay for their own (quite cheap) birth control? The FSA is truly nuts.
More of the same from the pro-aborts: http://www.prochoiceviolence.com/
So... Not only are they murderers, but also they’re arsonists.
They will have a hard time getting any lower than that.
Too bad that real terrorist threats are ignored when they come from the maniacs on the left.
Wow...
What a complete lunatic asylum this country has become.
The absolute hypocrisy and duplicity of the American statist left defies logical explanation!
Putting aside for the moment that “statist left” and “logical” should NEVER APPEAR in the same rant, the just announced Hobby Lobby decision by the Supremes displayed it for all to see. All, that is, except the looney 47% who are receiving all the “free” chit and other goodies dispensed by the left to keep them voting for Democrat hacks who promise more and more of the free chit.
At the time the left rammed through the (Un)Affordable Care Act, there were loud protests from the few million or so sane citizens still living here that it would interpose fedzilla into the formerly sacred relationship between patient and doctor. The equally looney “We have to pass it to find out what’s in it” left quickly waved a collective imperious hand and uttered a royal “Tsk, tsk”, dismissed the objectors and returned to destroying the fabric of the country.
Comes now the favorable Hobby Lobby decision and comes now two pro-abortion radical feminazis to – where else – MSNBC to decry and lament over the decision. One was Rep. Nita Lowey from NYC (aka Gomorrah on the Hudson) and another woman representing one of the several Margaret Sanger eugenics inspired pro-abortion groups still murdering babies in the former safety of their mothers’ wombs.
Their first and only opposition argument? Though I suspect you have figured this out, better brace yourself: “It would interfere with the sanctity of the relationship between a woman and her doctor.”
And before you hit the reply button with “What about the hypocrisy of the pro-life right in celebrating Hobby Lobby?”
You may have overlooked the third and silent party in the discussion: The unborn baby!
The pro-aborts maintain that a fetus is NOT a human being either until birth or the third trimester. (I’ll believe that when a human female delivers a chicken or a cow.) And a number of courts here and in other nations regularly rule in support of that erroneous notion.
And while we’re discussing “hypocrisy”, can you explain this to me? How is it that those same courts correctly rule in cases involving intentional or accidental serious injury to or death of a pregnant woman that if her unborn baby is injured or dies, her baby constitutes a SECOND victim of the trauma or crime and the jury/judge nearly always factors that into the civil judgment or criminal sentence?
That concept comes down to us from the over 2,000 year old law found in the Bible.
And here’s one final piece of law from that Good Book: “A double-minded man (or woman) is UNSTABLE in ALL his (or her) ways”.
What does that say about 21st century America?
Just sayin’
Dick Bachert
6 30 2014
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.