Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Issa Calls for Special Prosecutor in IRS Case; Suggests Immunity for Lerner
Breitbart ^ | 26 Jun 2014

Posted on 06/26/2014 11:13:04 AM PDT by mandaladon

House Oversight Committee Chairman Rep. Darrel Issa (R-CA) demanded a special prosecutor to investigate the IRS over its targeting of conservative groups and the disappearance of emails from key officials.

Issa declared that IRS Commissioner John Koskinen is “not the ideal person, not even an appropriate person” to oversee the investigation into the IRS’ conducts, and that this case calls for a true, special, independent prosecutor who has the ability to issue warrants, to seize materials, to safeguard documents and other information before it goes away and get to the truth.”

He added that a special prosecutor will almost certainly not be named by President Barack Obama or Attorney General Eric Holder.

Issa added that the revelation that Lois Lerner improperly gave the personal information of donors to the Justice Department made it clear that her attorney should “take back that statement she made, that perjured statement that she broke no laws, she broke no regulations.” He concluded, “of course she broke laws and of course she broke regulations and we need to hold her accountable.”

Even though he said that Lerner was “biased,” “had an agenda,” and “broke laws,” Issa stated that he “absolutely” would be willing to give Lerner immunity “if she would deliver to us the explanation of who she worked with in this conspiracy.”

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Political Humor/Cartoons
KEYWORDS: 113th; destroyedevidence; doj; irs; irsscandal; issa; lerner; loislerner; loislerneremails; obama; smidgen; specialprosecutor
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 next last
To: mandaladon

Forget about it.

1. The emails are gone. The reason it took so long say that the emails were deleted is that the folks deleting the emails were thorough and it took time.

2. With no emails, there is no evidence. Despite the fact there is proof that evidence was destroyed, the lack of evidence makes it impossible to prosecute Lerner or go after her superiors.

3. The people responsible for maintaining and preserving those email will not be prosecuted because there is no “proof” of criminal intent. (Proof of criminal intent is required during Democrat Administrations, but not during ‘Pubbie Administrations where simply forgetting something can land you in jail.)


21 posted on 06/26/2014 11:30:50 AM PDT by Little Ray (How did I end up in this hand-basket, and why is it getting so hot?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dandiegirl
I think she would still lie even if given immunity. I want her to go to jail.

If she does lie, the immunity goes away.

I would happily see her get immunity and have her testify. She'd be the government version of Sammy the Bull, and would do for the IRS (and the government) what he did for the Gambino crime family and the Mafia.

22 posted on 06/26/2014 11:36:33 AM PDT by Maceman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: livius

I remember the case of the woman using a false name email to conduct secret government business, and I think she was with the EPA, but I would not doubt that Lerner did something similar.

Lerner did use a personal computer, at least it seems that Gowdy knows so. In the second part of the hearing on Tuesday Gowdy questions O’Connor around 31:00 - 36:00. At the very end he asks O’Connor whether Lerner used a personal computer, and the “I know nuthin” liar mumbles some inanity. Gowdy shoots back: “She did.” At which point his 5 minutes were up.

http://oversight.house.gov/hearing/irs-obstruction-lois-lerners-missing-e-mails-part-ii/

Months ago I recall Gowdy saying that a good prosecutor will not ask a question for which he did not already know the correct answer. Gowdy shot that “She did!” at her to let her know that she is in deep trouble. I think they have proof that O’Connor is part of the cover up.


23 posted on 06/26/2014 11:39:42 AM PDT by Cap Huff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

NO!!! How STUPID can we be!! NAIL HER and SEND HER TO PRISON!!!! She will LIE ANYWAY....she’s a DEMOCRAT....it’s what they DO!!


24 posted on 06/26/2014 11:39:56 AM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion.....the Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon
We should CRUCIFY Lois Lerner.
25 posted on 06/26/2014 11:40:22 AM PDT by Tzimisce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

This is why the democRTAS will pull out all the stops in 2014 to hold the senate, and deploy everything that’s left in reserve for 2016.

IF they lose control of the levers of power they are going to get fried in corruption charges


26 posted on 06/26/2014 11:40:51 AM PDT by Ouderkirk (To the left, everything must evidence that this or that strand of leftist theory is true)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tzimisce

I’d like to see the head of the IRS perp walked also. One of the charges would be Felony smugness. French revolution charge against the royalty.


27 posted on 06/26/2014 11:41:41 AM PDT by morphing libertarian ( On to impeachment and removal (IRS, Taliban, Fast and furious, VA, Benghazi)!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

Special Prosecutor. No immunity.


28 posted on 06/26/2014 11:44:14 AM PDT by conservative98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

That she currently walks free on our streets unmolested is a black eye upon every citizen that passes her.


29 posted on 06/26/2014 11:46:00 AM PDT by Noamie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

Following rant not directed to you personally, don’t take offense.

Due to dietary restraints, I will have to switch to Pork Rines from Pop Corn. Watching BOTH sides of the aisle has the same quality as Reality TV. It is all to distract and entertain us while nothing of substance is done.

Anyone that doesn’t understand that America is done is delusional. The GOP buying black votes in Mississippi has to be the final straw.

I am done. Blacks want to screw America...fine. I will vote for Democrats from now on. No one screws Blacks like the Democrats, especially Black Democrats. Payback is a biotch.

America will not be brought back by the ballot box, so the only thing left is to help the Democrats finish the job and start over from the ashes.

Only chance would be a Palin led third party. From most replies I have seen so far on FR is : Can’t do that! NOOO! Third party would mean the Democrats would not be stopped. Need Republicans to save the Supreme Court..Like we were saved from the wise latina...and Roberts hasn’t betrayed us... THEY ARE NOT BEING STOPPED NOW AND THE GOP IS KILLING THE TEA PARTY!

We have nothing left to lose by going third party. It is the only chance to restore America without bullets and I fear it is too late for even that.

Free Republic, thanks for the opportunity to rant.


30 posted on 06/26/2014 11:47:07 AM PDT by Gadsden1st
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon
Is there any way a Congressional Committee can go after Lerner's pension, especially once it's proven that she was engaged in illegal activities while in her role as a Gov't employee?

While she may not end up with any jail time (although I hope otherwise), I'll bet that arrogant smirk would be wiped from her face were she to lose her cushy retirement income unless she cooperates fully. As it stands now, she has nothing to lose by just keeping her trap shut and riding off into the sunset.

31 posted on 06/26/2014 11:47:25 AM PDT by mellow velo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Little Ray; mandaladon; maggief; Oldeconomybuyer

They’re not gone...... see these posts: (h/t maggief, oldeconomybuyer

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3172288/posts?page=22#22

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3172288/posts?page=105#105


32 posted on 06/26/2014 11:51:58 AM PDT by WildHighlander57 ((WildHighlander57, returning after lurking since 2000)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Don Corleone
Never grant immunity unless you know for certain the information you are going to receive...never!

What you said.

33 posted on 06/26/2014 11:57:07 AM PDT by PistolPaknMama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RitaOK

Ah, could be. But I know Little Lois let slip the other day that she was using her blackberry. I don’t know if it was government issued or if it was hers personally.


34 posted on 06/26/2014 11:57:59 AM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

Special prosecuter, good idea

Giving Lois lerner immunity, terrible idea, that evil tyrant of a witch needs jail time.


35 posted on 06/26/2014 11:58:55 AM PDT by Cubs Fan (liberalism is a cancer that destroys everything it gets control of.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Little Ray
Forget about it.

1. The emails are gone. The reason it took so long say that the emails were deleted is that the folks deleting the emails were thorough and it took time.

2. With no emails, there is no evidence. Despite the fact there is proof that evidence was destroyed, the lack of evidence makes it impossible to prosecute Lerner or go after her superiors.

3. The people responsible for maintaining and preserving those email will not be prosecuted because there is no “proof” of criminal intent. (Proof of criminal intent is required during Democrat Administrations, but not during ‘Pubbie Administrations where simply forgetting something can land you in jail.)


These are democrats were talking about. Maybe. Many, many people had to be involved in this or seen what was going on. I bet there are people who kept some evidence knowing what it would be worth. There's evidence out there, if Issa doesn't already have it. He may be holding it back until closer to the election. The obama and the media won't have time to make up lies about it. All he has to say is he wanted everyone to testify so he knows who he will later prosecute. Let them bury themselves.
36 posted on 06/26/2014 11:59:42 AM PDT by Linda Frances (Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Don Corleone
Godfather, I don't think Lerner will ever talk even if granted immunity. She was chosen for this particular assignment because it was understood that she would be willing to go to prison if found out, but would never spill the beans. She's a true believer, and willing to take one for the team.

Capice?

37 posted on 06/26/2014 11:59:45 AM PDT by mojito (Zero, our Nero.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: WildHighlander57
Indeed, the emails appear to have been discovered via some Blackberry path. More than one email has been revealed. In addition to the email involving illegal tracking of a Sitting US Senator.
I wonder if Retired US Senators were illegally targeted?
An Independent Counsel can be appointed by a Federal Judge.
I hope Mz Lerner enjoys each day she lives as a free citizen.
All things come to an end.
TWB
38 posted on 06/26/2014 12:01:59 PM PDT by TWhiteBear (a)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

Issa: Okay, if you’ll agree to testify, I’ll grant you immunity.

Lois: From what?

Issa: From prosecution.

Lois: By whom?

Issa: Eric H— Oh, crap.


39 posted on 06/26/2014 12:02:31 PM PDT by william clark (Ecclesiastes 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cap Huff

Thanks! Glad you caught that. I think Lois is in big trouble just for that alone.

I wonder if O’Connor’s “somebody named Ben,” supposedly the only coworker she could remember, was actually an alias used by one of the co-conspirators.


40 posted on 06/26/2014 12:04:09 PM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson