THE BUNDY DAUGHTER SPEAKS OUT ON GOVERNMENT TERRORISM AGAINST HER FAMILY! (Nevada Rancher)

America's Freedom Fighters ^ | Apr 9, 2014 | Clark Kent

[xzins]

By SHIREE BUNDY COX:

I have had people ask me to explain my dad’s stance on this BLM fight.

Here it is in as simple of terms as I can explain it. There is so much to it, but here it is in a nut shell.

My great grandpa bought the rights to the Bunkerville allotment back in 1887 around there. Then he sold them to my grandpa who then turned them over to my dad in 1972.

These men bought and paid for their rights to the range and also built waters, fences and roads to assure the survival of their cattle, all with their own money, not with tax dollars.

These rights to the land use is called preemptive rights.

Some where down the line, to keep the cows from over grazing, came the bureau of land management. They were supposed to assist the ranchers in the management of their ranges while the ranchers paid a yearly allotment which was to be use to pay the BLM wages and to help with repairs and improvements of the ranches.

My dad did pay his grazing fees for years to the BLM until they were no longer using his fees to help him and to improve.

Instead they began using these money’s against the ranchers.

They bought all the rest of the ranchers in the area out with their own grazing fees.

When they offered to buy my dad out for a penence he said no thanks and then fired them because they weren’t doing their job.

He quit paying the BLM but, tried giving his grazing fees to the county, which they turned down.

So my dad just went on running his ranch and making his own improvements with his own equipment and his own money, not taxes.

In essence the BLM was managing my dad out of business.

Well when buying him out didn’t work, they used the indangered species card.

You’ve already heard about the desert tortis.

Well that didn’t work either, so then began the threats and the court orders, which my dad has proven to be unlawful for all these years.

Now they’re desperate.

It’s come down to buying the brand inspector off and threatening the County Sheriff.

Everything they’re doing at this point is illegal and totally against the constitution of the United States of America.

Now you may be saying,” how sad, but what does this have to do with me?” Well, I’ll tell you.

They will get rid of Cliven Bundy, the last man standing on the Bunkerville allotment and then they will close all the roads so no one can ever go on it again.

Next, it’s Utah’s turn. Mark my words, Utah is next.

Then there’s the issue of the cattle that are at this moment being stolen. See even if dad hasn’t paid them, those cattle do belong to him.

Regardless where they are they are my fathers property. His herd has been part of that range for over a hundred years, long before the BLM even existed.

Now the Feds think they can just come in and remove them and sell them without a legal brand inspection or without my dad’s signature on it.

They think they can take them over two boarders, which is illegal, ask any trucker. Then they plan to take them to the Richfeild Auction and sell them.

All with our tax money.

They have paid off the contract cowboys and the auction owner as well as the Nevada brand inspector with our tax dollars.

See how slick they are?

Well, this is it in a nut shell. Thanks”

[crz]

You know Daxton. We here in the area have known this since the bastard has been around. Yet, the blinders are on most folk and hence, we go the way of Germany prior to WW2.

Thank you for your contributions to society. YOU are a real brave person.

[BuckeyeTexan]

Then all the land from New England to the west coast including Alaska is the same.

The U.S. purchased all of that from Mexico? I think not.

Again; Article one “1” Section eight “8” the 17th enumerated power.

A1S8 does not apply because the land in question was purchased from Mexico by lawful treaty and not “purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be.” Nevada was not even a state when the U.S. purchased that land.

[rolling_stone]

prescriptive easement
grazing rights (historical)
not so cut and dried

and protector of the turtles and killer of cattle?

http://www.biologicaldiversity.org/programs/public_lands/deserts/nevada/pdfs/Cattle-grazing-in-Gold-Butte-area-11-29-2010.pdf

[BuckeyeTexan]

Point me to the rules. I’ll read them and then answer accordingly. Generally, I do not support most of what the EPA does. I think the agency should be dissolved.

[dragnet2]

They come out en-mass with snipers, helicopters and threats over some heffers chewing weeds, allegedly trespassing on fed private land....But a 30+ year conga-line of tens of millions entering U.S., looting everything in sight, that's A-OK...

In fact just talking about these looting trespassers makes you a racist.

This could only happen in a country run by corrupt, controlling evil lunatics.

But I sure like how events like this expose some here, who clearly think it's perfectly legitimate and honorable for the Fedgov to pick and choose which laws to enforce, as they recklessly use the fees and fines to destruct and divide this once great country.

[Donnafrflorida]

wish i could. saw on FB that a bunch of folks are headed that way. God speed.

[crz]

file:///C:/Documents%20and%20Settings/Lynn/My%20Documents/Downloads/LW-EPA-proposed-waters-rule%20(1).pdf

[crz]

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2014/04/04/EPA-Proposal-Seeks-Huge-Power-Grab-Over-Farmlands

[BuckeyeTexan]

No, I do not support the EPA’s proposed rules. The EPA’s regulatory authority is restricted to “relatively permanent waters” that connect to “navigable waterways.”

Whether or not the pools, ponds, and creeks existed before a particular state is irrelevant. The federal government does not own those pools, ponds, and creeks. The proposed EPA rules are not the same as the BLM removing “trespass cattle” from land owned by the federal government.

[Eagles6]

You are appropriately subservient. Please kneel and kiss the boot on your neck...NOW!

[BuckeyeTexan]

No. The federal government bought the land in 1848 from Mexico under the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo.

[caww]

I just watched a video on that today...heck I didn’t even know there was an issue with the Gov grabbing his cattle....but I understand the fight’s been going on for many years over this to begin with...looks like it’s coming to a head...course with Obama’s team in office expect anything like this!

This thing BTW has nothing to do with Turtles being protected..as usual. All to do with EPA throwing their weight around again.......’they want the money’ they say he owes... a milllion or so in lease fees...so they will always put the heat on...they are after all the Governments “Thugs”.....like the IRS...going after the money!

[P-Marlowe]

In what manner do you think the questionable legality of the Mexican War affects the enforceability of the Treaty?

The only means of enforcing a "peace" treaty is through threat of war. Eventually thre will be enough Mexicans in the Southwest that Mexico will be able to annex it and our limp wristed leadership will do nothing about it.

[crz]

They are exactly the same. They use these “rules” to illegally take property.

In this case, they use the endangered species act.

[DaxtonBrown]

“Thank you for your contributions to society. YOU are a real brave person.”

Or stupid.
Jon Ralston, John L Smith, Steve Sebelius all blackballed my expose on Harry Reid.

[Kackikat]

I believe there are some things the government was never supposed to own....land being one of them. That much control will always need restraint, and not being able to own the land would have kept temptation on the back burner.

In the Bible the Levi Tribe were the Priests, Spiritual power, however they could not own land...the sacrifices and the temple were their part.

Power has to be God controlled and reigned in, and if they can own what you have, it will always be corrupted by individuals who manipulate... to take away what others have worked for, or their ancestors.

I agree about the illegals, and the behavior of leftist vote fraudsters. These people love chaos.

[Kackikat]

Be thankful...there could have been a slew of Ted Bundy, serial killer pics.

[Eagles6]

The Bundy's have been using this land in a lawful manner for generations. They quit paying grazing fees to the feds because they felt that the feds,I.e., their employees, were not doing their job and working against their interests.

Let's say there are a couple of hundred thousand or a couple of million dollars in grazing fees in dispute. An amount that could be paid tonight simply by them asking for donations.

Let's put aside that al sharptounge owes the irs far more, as does hijackson.

Let's put aside that the regime has no problem with tens of millions of illegal invaders illegally "grazing" on federal property.

The questions are: Why are they doing this and why are they doing this now?

[BuckeyeTexan]

They are exactly the same.

No, they are not even close to being the same.

They use these “rules” to illegally take property. In this case, they use the endangered species act.

No, the BLM is using a valid court order not arbitrary rules created by an Executive branch agency.

[rfreedom4u]

I wish Nevada would claim Imminent Domain and take possession of the “fed property” in their state.

I wonder what the feds would have to say about that?