[Oliviaforever]

Obama Execitive Orders are getting people killed.

[rstrahan]

We can thank Clinton for making it a gun free zone, condemn Bush for not repealing it and not codifying that repeal into law. The CO of the base admitted there was a 15 minute response time.

When seconds count, the police are minutes away.

[Diogenesis]

The EXEMPT US Government ONLY protects terrorists,
lets terrorists in without passports (e.g.Boston)
and keeps open borders for terrorists, and
arms them from Libya to Syria to Egypt to Mexico.

If caught, Holder and the DO”J” protect them making sure
they are not executed for their murders.

[Calusa]

Progressivism is disarming America and destroying the noble American military tradition. Our next Pearl Harbour/911 moment will again, predictably, rock our world I fear.

[Sarah Barracuda]

Clinton started it and no one changed it..of course they are sitting ducks, libs like it that way

[The Right wing Infidel]

The regulation that disarmed soldiers came in 1992 under George H.W. Bush presidency but took effect after Clinton took office

[SADMILLIE]

This was the fault of that tax raising Bush 1!! know that == feel that. These bushes are horrible presidents. I won’t go into the most colossal foreign policy error in our entire history on bush 2.
We need arms on our military NOW!!( They are afraid of them)

[E. Pluribus Unum]

“Apparently the only government department without a military force at its disposal is the military.” —Mark Stein

[roadcat]

However, as was true in the 2009 attack at Fort Hood by Major Nidal Malik Hasan, soldiers, like my son, are banned from having weapons on base unless they have “a credible and specific threat against [military] personnel [exists] in that region.”

So a sneak attack by Russians invading will meet no resistance! Obama's folly.

[lightman]

[AlmaKing]

You’re not going to see a lot of vets in favor of concealed carry on base post on this thread because they actually agree with the weapons restrictions.

[Star Traveler]

Obama wants sitting ducks!

[Yorlik803]

I kind of understand not arming all Soldiers, Kind of anyways. But why aren’t NCOs and Officers armed?

[freeangel]

“The Obama administration hasn’t learned anything from the massacres at Fort Hood in 2009 or the Washington Navy Yard last year. “

Obama learned plenty. He’s decided that the more servicepeople he can put at risk for being murdered, the better. He probably gave out candies at his fundraisers.

[E. Pluribus Unum]

[OneWingedShark]

However, as was true in the 2009 attack at Fort Hood by Major Nidal Malik Hasan, soldiers, like my son, are banned from having weapons on base unless they have “a credible and specific threat against [military] personnel [exists] in that region.”

One thing that I never get a straight answer on is the following question:
If (1) Army and Navy bases are federal property, and (2) the Constitution is binding on the federal government, and (3) the Second Amendment, as ratified, reads as A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed. which (4) makes any order or law infringing on the right to keep and bear arms illegitimate, then (5) by what authority do the commanders [or congress] have to prohibit the soldiers (and sailors) for keeping and bearing arms?

They always, always squirm at that.