Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Connecticut halts plans to round up firearms after finding most cops in the state are on the list
CALLTHE COPS.NET ^ | March 06,2014 | CALLTHE COPS.NET

Posted on 03/08/2014 4:01:57 AM PST by SWAMPSNIPER

Connecticut halts plans to round up firearms after finding most cops in the state are on the list

Connecticut has been making news due to their hastily passed gun registration laws. According to some sources as few as 15% of gun owners have actually registered their firearms. News Blogs have been warning state officials are talking about mass confiscations of the unregistered firearms.

Plans for these confiscations hit a snag when a legislative intern dared to ask a question. “Who will be going door to door to take all the guns away?” asked the 21-year-old college senior.

Reportedly multiple people in the room in the most sarcastic voices they could muster said “the police”.

The unnamed intern then pointed at the list and said, “my dad’s name is on the list, and he is the police chief. I see three other names on this list of family members, all cops.”

(Excerpt) Read more at callthecops.net ...


TOPICS: Humor
KEYWORDS: cop; gun; satire
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last
To: PaulCruz2016
“Who will be going door to door to take all the guns away?”

The first ones to DIE!

21 posted on 03/08/2014 4:54:13 AM PST by Feckless (I was trained by the US << This Tagline Censored by FR >> ain't that irOnic?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SWAMPSNIPER

Even if this is fictional, it is a wonderful teaching moment in civics. One of the RKBA memes should loudly be: any law enforcement officer who is called upon to enforce this law should consider that his oath of office requires him to resign.


22 posted on 03/08/2014 5:04:56 AM PST by theBuckwheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SWAMPSNIPER

Must be different folks in CT than CA. CA citizens rolled over for assault weapons registration years ago without even a wimper.


23 posted on 03/08/2014 5:09:38 AM PST by umgud (2A can't survive dem majorities)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SWAMPSNIPER

Connecticut wouldn’t do ANYTHING like stopping a roundup. Mallory HATES guns.


24 posted on 03/08/2014 5:12:00 AM PST by ExCTCitizen (2014: The Year of DEAD RINOS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Working Man

I would expect the enforcers to be exempted, as well as the politicians and their associated Union thugs, party donors, bureaucrats and political hacks.

I would not expect to see the doors of any inner city gangsta cribs being kicked in, nor confiscation SWAT teams venturing into any Muslim enclaves.

Enforcement is typically quite selective, and I presume confiscation will be too.

Race (White), religion (Christian or Jewish) and political ideology (they have the voter registration and political donation data base as well as NRA Membership lists and whatever else the NSA cares to share with them to compare with their “scofflaw” list, you can bet) will be factors in determining who gets visited by the gestapo first, and who will be “taught a lesson” and “made an example of”.

Anyone who resists will be used to reenforce the propaganda that all NRA or TEA Members, Veterans or whoever can be associated with the probably dead insurgent are “radical/violent/terrorists”.

Thousands of sheeple will cheer the gestapo on and bleat with delight while they mow you down and / or incinerate your home and family.

I keep getting a sinking feeling that this is probably not going to end well.

If you think that armed resistance is going to work, check with those who resisted gun confiscation under Hugo Chavez in Venezuela a few years back.


25 posted on 03/08/2014 5:19:59 AM PST by George Varnum (Isaiah 5:20 Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Dubh_Ghlase

Yeah! Because until the law is repealed, it is still there to be used.


26 posted on 03/08/2014 5:24:49 AM PST by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sport

haha Connecticut —egg on your face!


27 posted on 03/08/2014 5:27:58 AM PST by brooklyn dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: theBuckwheat

It only counts as “satire” if it’s an exaggeration or somehow ironic. This is not.


28 posted on 03/08/2014 5:39:33 AM PST by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Glenmore
Pretty sad when it’s hard to tell satire from truth.

Well, who's to say that isn't exactly how the gun grabbers have it planned anyway?

29 posted on 03/08/2014 5:46:54 AM PST by Mark17 (Chicago Blackhawks: Stanley Cup champions 2010, 2013. Vietnam Vet 70-71 Msgt US Air Force, retired)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Glenmore
Pretty sad when it’s hard to tell satire from truth.

I'm betting that it's close to the truth.
Here in Colorado, LOTS of police, sheriffs and deputies are hunters and firearms enthusiasts.
30 posted on 03/08/2014 6:40:46 AM PST by RandallFlagg ("I said I never had much use for one. Never said I didn't know how to use it." --Quigley)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: PaulCruz2016

A good hoax is always based on a partial truth. LEOs often have the mindset that they personally *need* better and more powerful firepower.

And it does not take a “rocket surgeon” to figure out that this registration scheme is nothing but a confiscation scheme. So, while LEOs generally do want to obey the law, like everyone else, they are far less likely to obey stupid laws that can hurt them.

So, bottom line: yes, LEOs likely have a LOT of such weapons, and are also not likely to register them, especially if they can avoid doing so. For example, I can imagine a lot of them having caches with friends just across the state borders. Having your gun an hour drive away is far better than not having one at all.


31 posted on 03/08/2014 7:10:19 AM PST by yefragetuwrabrumuy (WoT News: Rantburg.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: piroque; sport

Amen to both...


32 posted on 03/08/2014 8:25:06 AM PST by Dubh_Ghlase (Therefore, send not to know For whom the bell tolls, It tolls for thee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Feckless

One commenter had the perfect solution—those fools who passed the law should be the first to lead in the confiscation!


33 posted on 03/08/2014 8:31:57 AM PST by SgtHooper (If at first you don't succeed, skydiving is not for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: SgtHooper

I challenged Chet Edwards in the 90’s over the Golden Cheeked Warbler. Told him don’t send some young deputy with kids to get shot, come yourself. Never got an answer, I’m sure it was included in my Secret Service file.


34 posted on 03/08/2014 9:15:56 AM PST by Feckless (I was trained by the US << This Tagline Censored by FR >> ain't that irOnic?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson