Abolish PBS Enough of government paid for propaganda
Judy WoodROUGH . . yuck . . Al what’s his name must be homo
I doubt Cruz gives a sh*t what this nobody thinks anyway. I know I don't.
That Brooks rant is absolutely incoherent.
I thought Obama was Brook’s aphrodesiac.
The left, of which Brooks belong, are truly afrain of Cruz.
Bump.
Just saying.
PBS and David are out saltpeter.
The effective explanation, he was going to force a lot of Republican senators, including Mitch McConnell, that are up, to force — to make them cast an unpleasant vote, which is going to help make it harder for them in the primaries against a more rightward challenger. And so he put a lot of people in a tough bind.
Good. Good for Cruz. He’s representing those who sent him there. He is DOING HIS JOB!!! And Cruz doing what he did, showed the true colors of the “establishment” Republicans. The line has been drawn, and you are either ON the side of the Constitution and rule of law, or you are not.
Our government is so backasswards that these media dumbasses don’t even recognize how upside down our system of governance is. And he calls himself a “conservative”?? HA! Loony toon progressive wannabe, if I’ve ever heard one. He needs to join the ranks of those he is protecting.
He thinks there`s a spending problem in the country, and Republicans should fight harder before raising the debt ceiling, and they should get some spending reforms. That`s the nominal explanation.
If Brooks was a conservative he would had said “he KNOWS there’s a spending problem in the Country and he is trying to force Republicans to be Republicans and work towards some spending reforms”
Brooks did not say this so he likely is not much of a conservative!
Someone on Fox nailed it the other night when he said that both the democrat and republican parties fear and hate the Tea Party because they’re going to expose them both for the self-serving corruption that is the culture of Washington DC.
PBS = Affirmative Action for untalented broadcasters.
That's cool. I refer to the collective left as "our continuing Neanderthal moment'.
Beg to differ, David. Boehner, et al, aren't interested in "picking fights". They're about avoiding fights.
Their "strategy" is to lose. That way, they don't have to take responsibility for anything.
All the hate just makes Cruz all the stronger, we seen the very same thing with Reagan.
The crease in Cruz’ pants doesn’t crackle enough to satisfy Brooks, rumour has it.
They'll eventually get after Cruz more intensely than they went after Sarah Palin.
“And the basic problem have been here before. They’re not all insane. They saw how badly it went last time, and they made a completely rational strategic decision, let`s just let it go and let`s move on and talk about something else. And that`s called basic strategy, nursery school-style.”
This is false. There was no GOP “strategy” last time. Progressive Republicans were allowed free reign to undermine the alleged GOP position during the shut down.
Note that consevative for pay useful idiots like Brooks don’t have a problem with King, McCain, Corker, etc. stabbing conservatives in the back. For a supposed conservative he sure spends a lot of time trying to delegitimize conservative positions.