Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Duck Patriarch: Man-Man Sex ‘Not Logical'; CDC: ‘Anal Sex is the Highest Risk Sexual Behavior’
cnsnews.com ^ | December 23, 2013 | Michael W. Chapman

Posted on 01/09/2014 5:05:53 AM PST by ilovesarah2012

(CNSNews.com) – Although some liberal observers criticized Duck Dynasty patriarch Phil Robertson’s remarks about homosexual behavior as “disgusting” and “vile and extreme stereotypes,” the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), one of the federal government’s leading health voices, uses nearly identical and even more graphic language in describing some of the sexual practices of male homosexuals.

“Gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (MSM) represent approximately 2% of the United States population, yet they are the population most severely affected by HIV,” says the CDC. “Most HIV infections in men are transmitted through sexual contact, especially anal sex.”

(Excerpt) Read more at cnsnews.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: homosexualagenda
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 next last
To: Froggie
Almost no one in America has true “limited access to health care”.... but what they may have is “limited access to having someone else pay for their health care!”

Undeniable truth of the day! I WILL be stealing that one, with attribution of course!

21 posted on 01/09/2014 5:50:58 AM PST by JimRed (Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed & water the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS NOW & FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bray

And they are promoting it to children. Vile people.


22 posted on 01/09/2014 5:52:03 AM PST by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: IronJack

Watch the TV show 2 Broke Girls, I think its in the 9pm time slot. They discuss anal sex on almost every episode that I have seen. We rented a movie the other night with Jennifer Aniston, and anal was one of the jokes as well.

I notice that this is now acceptable territory for mainstream TV and movies when talking about doing it with women but its forbidden to discuss it when talking about men because it allows people to get a visual of what gays do to each other.


23 posted on 01/09/2014 5:53:19 AM PST by bigtoona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: MrB

You nailed it.

Homosexuals are just a club to beat the capitalists into submission. You have to want homosexual marriage or you are a hater and not to be taken seriously. Only the Marxists are lovers and tolerant which is saintly and intolerance is the most deadly sin to Marxism.


24 posted on 01/09/2014 5:53:34 AM PST by bray ("The Republic of Texas 2022" is coming in Feb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: House Atreides
As many health sites state...

It's an exit...not an entrance.

25 posted on 01/09/2014 5:57:34 AM PST by Jane Long (While Marxists continue the fundamental transformation of the USA, progressive RINOs assist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ilovesarah2012

Parents keep your children away from queers and democrats.

Sorry, my statement might be a little redundant...even racist in some cases./s

Oh well, parents need to follow Ronald Reagan’s advice and trust but verify...these people want your children’s minds and bodies. Don’t let them have them.


26 posted on 01/09/2014 6:05:10 AM PST by Texicanus (Texas, it's a whole 'nother country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ilovesarah2012

A prominent member of Chicago’s homosexual community claims Barack Obama’s participation in the “gay” bar and bathhouse scene was so well known that many who were aware of his lifestyle were shocked when he ran for president and finally won the White House.

“It was preposterous to the people I knew then to think Obama was going to keep his gay life secret,” said Kevin DuJan, who was a gossip columnist in Chicago for various blogs when Obama was living in the city as a community organizer and later a state senator.

“Nobody who knew Obama in the gay bar scene thought he could possibly be president,” said DuJan.

DuJan, founder and editor of the Hillary Clinton-supporting website HillBuzz.org, told WND he has first-hand information from two different sources that “Obama was personally involved in the gay bar scene.”

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2012/09/claim-obama-hid-gay-life-to-become-president/#YB3F8z6RuuyP3BO3.99


27 posted on 01/09/2014 6:06:37 AM PST by PLD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ilovesarah2012
Here's what lunatics all the homo-advocacy groups are. Back in the early 80's when it became well known that unprotected anal sex was the chief cause of AIDs, what did all the homo-advocacy groups do? They blamed Reagan because the Reagan admin didn't find a cure for the disease which could have been stopped in its tracks by homos using condoms.

Then they launched a national campaign to try and fool the public by claiming everybody was at an equal risk for AIDs when 97% of the cases involved male homos or druggies using dirty needles.

Today, nothing has changed. Male homos still contract diseases from unprotected anal sex at much higher rates than non homos. But do they blame themselves? Nah, like all lib groups they blame others for their problems they created.

28 posted on 01/09/2014 6:11:45 AM PST by driftless2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coffee... Black... No Sugar
"taxed"

That is a capital idea and one I never thought of. If I couldn't think of it first, you sir are a genius.

29 posted on 01/09/2014 6:14:21 AM PST by driftless2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ilovesarah2012

Rather than calling homosexual men by the misleading and complimentary epithet ‘gay’, perhaps we should, in the interests of truth and fairness (’cause we’re all about fairness now, if not so much the truth), commence referring to homosexual men as ‘fudge-packers’ or ‘anal explorers’?

It does make more sense to name something according to its nature?


30 posted on 01/09/2014 6:17:22 AM PST by LucianOfSamasota (Tanstaafl - its not just for breakfast anymore...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mlizzy
"Probably both. I mean would one go swimming in a sewage treatment plant every day and expect to stay healthy?"

What an excellent statement. Please consider it stolen for my future arguments with leftists, LOL.

31 posted on 01/09/2014 6:22:41 AM PST by CatherineofAragon ((Support Christian white males----the architects of the jewel known as Western Civilization.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: PACAP1

Thanks, that’s what mama used to teach us. We knew mama was always right. Mama was a godly woman and you didn’t mess with her or G-D.

She didn’t want her babies to grow up to be cowboys... or queers. /pun for you folks in Rio Linda.

No disrespect toward cowboys, she wanted a better life for her babies is all. Cowboys would have been all right with her.


32 posted on 01/09/2014 6:25:35 AM PST by Texicanus (Texas, it's a whole 'nother country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: bigtoona

It makes one wonder how many men are kidding themselves about being heterosexual.


33 posted on 01/09/2014 6:34:01 AM PST by Tax-chick (Tell the mad chameleon he's not welcome anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: MrB

Amazingly, even the Supreme Court has said the states have no legitimate reason for making sodomy illegal. There’s no government interest in reducing or ostracizing homosexual sodomy. Yet, the CDC keeps proving how the sodomite lifestyle consistently increases the spread of all sorts of nasty diseases. Then they dare blame it on homophobia!


34 posted on 01/09/2014 6:35:02 AM PST by CitizenUSA (Sodomy and abortion. The only constitutional rights protected by Democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: LucianOfSamasota

Does the term “butt f****rs” come to mind? Is that a bit too harsh to describe these poor sensitive people?

I wonder what terms are used in other countries around the world.


35 posted on 01/09/2014 6:43:21 AM PST by Texicanus (Texas, it's a whole 'nother country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: ilovesarah2012

As usual, the certified victim groups never accept responsibility for their actions. They always blame other people. And so they fall deeper in the pit they have dug for themselves.


36 posted on 01/09/2014 6:43:52 AM PST by I want the USA back (Media: completely irresponsible traitors. Complicit in the destruction of our country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ilovesarah2012
“Gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (MSM) represent approximately 2% of the United States population, yet they are the population most severely affected by HIV,” says the CDC. “Most HIV infections in men are transmitted through sexual contact, especially anal sex.”

I dunno, looks like real fun, self inflicted oral/anal sex.


37 posted on 01/09/2014 6:44:38 AM PST by USS Alaska (If I could...I would.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texicanus

So, what you are saying is: “Mamas, don’t let your babies grow up to be Dem-fags.”


38 posted on 01/09/2014 6:49:37 AM PST by Aevery_Freeman (It was the best of governments; it is the worst of governments.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: IronJack
"You can’t remove the risks from risky behavior any more than you can dehydrate water."

------------------------------>

Very profound. May I borrow?

39 posted on 01/09/2014 6:51:59 AM PST by hummingbird (Don't be afraid of the big words.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ilovesarah2012

Just last weekend, I was wondering, never having attended a Gay Pride Parade, are they “proud” of anything other than their sex? Their dysfunctional, unnatural sexual behavior?

On another note, how ironic is it that the gubmint report abbreviates this unhealthy, risky act as MSM?


40 posted on 01/09/2014 6:59:55 AM PST by gnickgnack2 (QUESTION obama's AUTHORITY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson