Posted on 01/08/2014 9:37:31 AM PST by Chickensoup
President Barack Obama is backing a controversial campaign by progressives to regulate schools disciplinary actions so that members of major racial and ethnic groups are penalized at equal rates, regardless of individuals behavior.
His July 26 executive order established a government panel to promote a positive school climate that does not rely on methods that result in disparate use of disciplinary tools.
African Americans lack equal access to highly effective teachers and principals, safe schools, and challenging college-preparatory classes, and they disproportionately experience school discipline, said the order, titled White House Initiative On Educational Excellence.
Because of those causes, the report suggests, over a third of African American students do not graduate from high school on time with a regular high school diploma, and only four percent of African American high school graduates interested in college are college-ready across a range of subjects.
What this means is that whites and Asians will get suspended for things that blacks dont get suspended for, because school officials will try to level punishments despite groups different infraction rates, predicted Hans Bader, a counsel at the Competitive Enterprise Institute. Bader is a former official in the Education Departments Office for Civil Rights, and has sued and represented school districts and colleges in civil-rights cases.
It is too bad that the president has chosen to set up a new bureaucracy with a focus on one particular racial group, to the exclusion of all others, said Roger Clegg, the president of the Center for Equal Opportunity.
A disproportionate share of crimes are committed by African Americans, and they are disproportionately likely to misbehave in school [because] more than 7 out of 10 African Americans (72.5 percent) are born out of wedlock versus fewer than 3 out of 10 whites, he said in a statement to The Daily Caller. Although you wont see it mentioned in the Executive Order there is an obvious connection between these [marriage] numbers and how each group is doing educationally, economically, criminally, he said.
The order created a Presidents Advisory Commission on Educational Excellence for African Americans. It will include senior officials from several federal agencies including the Departments of Education, Justice and Labor which have gained increased power over state education policies since 2009.
The progressives campaign for race-based discipline policies also won a victory in Maryland July 24.
The states board of education established a policy demanding that each racial or ethnic group receive roughly proportional level of school penalties, regardless of the behavior by members of each group.
The boards decision requires that the states 24 school systems track data to ensure that minority and special education students are not unduly affected by suspensions, expulsions and other disciplinary measures, said a July 25 Washington Post report.
Disparities would have to be reduced within a year and eliminated within three years, according to the Post.
The states new racial policy was welcomed by progressives, including Judith Browne Dianis, a director of the D.C.-based Advancement Project. Marylands proposal is on the cutting edge, she told the Post.
Dianis project is also a law firm that litigates race-related questions, and it gains from laws and regulations that spur race-related legal disputes.
The combination of overly harsh school policies has created a schoolhouse-to-jailhouse track, in which punitive measures such as suspensions, expulsions, and school-based arrests are increasingly used to deal with student misbehavior, claimed the groups website.
This is a racial justice crisis, because the students pushed out through harsh discipline are disproportionately students of color, the group insisted.
The administration had previously advertised its support for the campaign to impose race-based discipline policies.
In February, Attorney General Eric Holder claimed that weve often seen that students of color, students from disadvantaged backgrounds, and students with special needs are disproportionately likely to be suspended or expelled.
This is, quite simply, unacceptable. These unnecessary and destructive policies must be changed, he said in his speech, given in Atlanta, Ga.
Holders speech did not, however, include any evidence of discrimination toward any individual African-American student. For example, he offered no evidence that school infractions by African-American students prompt stiffer punishments than similar infractions by white, Hispanic or Asian students.
The progressive campaign to impose race-based rules on schools relies on various judges decisions, which penalize so-called disparate impact in hiring.
According to progressive lawyers, disparate impact may occur when companies or state and local governments hire and promote people at rates different from their percentage in the local population.
Because of judges decisions, juries can force companies and state agencies such as city boards that hire police officers and firefighters to pay heavy financial penalties to plaintiffs, even when hiring policies are recognized as color-blind.
When facing a disparate impact lawsuit, employers have to justify their hiring practices, for example, by showing that the job demands special skills possessed by relatively few members of a racial or ethnic group.
In 1997, however, the Seventh Circuit appeals court barred the practice of racial balancing in school discipline to avoid disparate impact lawsuits, said Bader.
Progressives say the disparate impact claims are supported by the 1964 Civil Right Act.
Critics, such as Clegg, say disparate impact law is used to trump popular and effective color-blind practices, such as civil-service tests by governments and employment-suitability testing by companies.
Another critic, David Rettig, head of the National Character Education Foundation, told The Daily Caller in February that apparently-disproportionate school discipline practices can be a reflection of local crime reports.
Outside the walls of the school, how many of these kids are coming from not just dysfunctional homes, but homes that are not supportive of their children? he told TheDC.
Concomitantly there have been studies that have shown that black teens and adults who were caught with crack were more likely that their white peers caught with cocaine to receive jail time. This was widely ballyhooed by the justice department and the press. What was not factored in was that many black arrestees, had prior records, were often armed with weapons, and often fought the arresting officers. This was rarely the case with white peers. Statistics can lie.
President Barack Obama is backing a controversial campaign by progressives to regulate schools disciplinary actions so that members of major racial and ethnic groups are penalized at equal rates, regardless of individuals behavior.
His July 26 executive order established a government panel to promote a positive school climate that does not rely on methods that result in disparate use of disciplinary tools.
African Americans lack equal access to highly effective teachers and principals, safe schools, and challenging college-preparatory classes, and they disproportionately experience school discipline, said the order, titled White House Initiative On Educational Excellence.
Because of those causes, the report suggests, over a third of African American students do not graduate from high school on time with a regular high school diploma, and only four percent of African American high school graduates interested in college are college-ready across a range of subjects.
What this means is that whites and Asians will get suspended for things that blacks dont get suspended for, because school officials will try to level punishments despite groups different infraction rates, predicted Hans Bader, a counsel at the Competitive Enterprise Institute. Bader is a former official in the Education Departments Office for Civil Rights, and has sued and represented school districts and colleges in civil-rights cases.
It is too bad that the president has chosen to set up a new bureaucracy with a focus on one particular racial group, to the exclusion of all others, said Roger Clegg, the president of the Center for Equal Opportunity.
A disproportionate share of crimes are committed by African Americans, and they are disproportionately likely to misbehave in school [because] more than 7 out of 10 African Americans (72.5 percent) are born out of wedlock versus fewer than 3 out of 10 whites, he said in a statement to The Daily Caller. Although you wont see it mentioned in the Executive Order there is an obvious connection between these [marriage] numbers and how each group is doing educationally, economically, criminally, he said.
The order created a Presidents Advisory Commission on Educational Excellence for African Americans. It will include senior officials from several federal agencies including the Departments of Education, Justice and Labor which have gained increased power over state education policies since 2009.
The progressives campaign for race-based discipline policies also won a victory in Maryland July 24.
The states board of education established a policy demanding that each racial or ethnic group receive roughly proportional level of school penalties, regardless of the behavior by members of each group.
The boards decision requires that the states 24 school systems track data to ensure that minority and special education students are not unduly affected by suspensions, expulsions and other disciplinary measures, said a July 25 Washington Post report.
Disparities would have to be reduced within a year and eliminated within three years, according to the Post.
The states new racial policy was welcomed by progressives, including Judith Browne Dianis, a director of the D.C.-based Advancement Project. Marylands proposal is on the cutting edge, she told the Post.
Dianis project is also a law firm that litigates race-related questions, and it gains from laws and regulations that spur race-related legal disputes.
The combination of overly harsh school policies has created a schoolhouse-to-jailhouse track, in which punitive measures such as suspensions, expulsions, and school-based arrests are increasingly used to deal with student misbehavior, claimed the groups website.
This is a racial justice crisis, because the students pushed out through harsh discipline are disproportionately students of color, the group insisted.
The administration had previously advertised its support for the campaign to impose race-based discipline policies.
In February, Attorney General Eric Holder claimed that weve often seen that students of color, students from disadvantaged backgrounds, and students with special needs are disproportionately likely to be suspended or expelled.
This is, quite simply, unacceptable. These unnecessary and destructive policies must be changed, he said in his speech, given in Atlanta, Ga.
Holders speech did not, however, include any evidence of discrimination toward any individual African-American student. For example, he offered no evidence that school infractions by African-American students prompt stiffer punishments than similar infractions by white, Hispanic or Asian students.
The progressive campaign to impose race-based rules on schools relies on various judges decisions, which penalize so-called disparate impact in hiring.
According to progressive lawyers, disparate impact may occur when companies or state and local governments hire and promote people at rates different from their percentage in the local population.
Because of judges decisions, juries can force companies and state agencies such as city boards that hire police officers and firefighters to pay heavy financial penalties to plaintiffs, even when hiring policies are recognized as color-blind.
When facing a disparate impact lawsuit, employers have to justify their hiring practices, for example, by showing that the job demands special skills possessed by relatively few members of a racial or ethnic group.
In 1997, however, the Seventh Circuit appeals court barred the practice of racial balancing in school discipline to avoid disparate impact lawsuits, said Bader.
Progressives say the disparate impact claims are supported by the 1964 Civil Right Act.
Critics, such as Clegg, say disparate impact law is used to trump popular and effective color-blind practices, such as civil-service tests by governments and employment-suitability testing by companies.
Another critic, David Rettig, head of the National Character Education Foundation, told The Daily Caller in February that apparently-disproportionate school discipline practices can be a reflection of local crime reports.
Outside the walls of the school, how many of these kids are coming from not just dysfunctional homes, but homes that are not supportive of their children? he told TheDC.
To boil it all down (my mom was a teacher for 25 years so I know how school “politics” works, for lack of a better term) to brass tacks, principals and teachers will now be terrified to discipline blacks or any other ethnic group mentioned in Holder’s discipline policies. This means that (public) schools will now be more of a “jungle” (no racism meant or implied) than they are already and if Holder thinks this will improve what passes for “education” these days, he and the rest of the Choom Gang are horribly mistaken .... as usual.
White Student: But, But, But...all I did was chew gum and it's my first offense!
Principle: Sigh...I know. But today I suspended a black student for fighting and drug possession. So under federal law I must suspend one white student to make it fair.
Holder thinks this will improve what passes for education these days
________________
Has nothing to do with improving schools or helping blacks, it is about angering and marginalizing whites. Welcome to South Africa.
So what's next ... political affirmative action? The next President to be impeached must be a Republican?
When will this nightmare end?
More institutionalized racism by the WH and the DOJ.
The insanity continues...
This executive Order came out in 2012 and it will be interesting to post all the unfair and ridiculous issues that have come up so the public schools can be compliant.
BTW. I do not take “orders” from any one. I am a free human.
what if the student is a white raised biracial with no slave blood, what does he count as?
At equal rates? Or does he mean equal punishment? Are they going to start whipping white kids now equally? Or are they going to start giving the white kids a pass for indiscretions because of their broken home and childhood?
Obama surely isn't suggesting that we have to find a way to punish more white kids to make if fair. That would be racist.
When will this nightmare end?
________________
When people say No More to this takeover of our government.
Oh,so in other words Blacks ARE more inclined to ciminal and anti social behavior. The DOJ is in agrement with White supremacists? Isn’t that special?
It was this type of policy that allowed Trayvon Martin to go free after being found with stolen items in his back pack at school. It really worked well for him.
The kids and their parents will have this policy nailed in a week..and any form of discipline will be out the window.
I feel sorry for any parent who is forced to have their kids in a public school with a high percentage of minorities. My kids were only in public schools for a couple years and that was enough.
Had the same thing back in the day at my high school.
Always had a black vice-principal to suspend white kids to balance the black kids being suspended by the white principal.
Not unlike NHL referees calling an even-up penalty.
According to Department of Justice whistleblower J. Christian Adams, AG Eric Holder has a certain something in his wallet. It is a quotation and he has carried it for decades. It essentially says, to quote Adams, "Blackness is more important than anything, and the black US attorney has common cause with the black criminal."
Because of those causes, the report suggests, over a third of African American students do not graduate from high school on time with a regular high school diploma, and only four percent of African American high school graduates interested in college are college-ready across a range of subjects.
Really? Black kids don't do as well in school because they are disciplined at a higher rate and they can't get into schools with good teachers? Wow.
This is exactly the cr** they pulled with Trayvon Martin. They knew he was a thief and druggie and fighter but they didn’t want to tarnish their school record. So they turned a deliberate blind eye.
How long until we have a president that is not a racist bent on dividing Americans?
How long until we have a president that is not a racist bent on dividing Americans?
When we say Enough!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.