Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

High Stakes For US Families Losing Jobless Benefit
AP Via Boston.com ^ | December 28, 2013 | AMY TAXIN and CHRISTOPHER S. RUGABER

Posted on 12/28/2013 3:05:47 PM PST by lbryce

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last
To: MV=PY
I defer to your greater knowledge regarding “benefits”, because its been several decades since I was even eligible to apply for them.

I've never “lost” my job, but have always resigned and found another one, usually never skipping a paycheck!
(Temporary employment agencies paid way more than unemployment benefits, and I could say no, if I didn't want a particular position)

Nowadays, at my age and skillset, I would probably choose to pursue 1099’d positions, instead of signing up with a temp agency.

61 posted on 12/28/2013 5:03:36 PM PST by sarasmom (Extortion 17. A large number of Navy SEALs died on that mission. Ask why.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Southack

For the fun of it, I posted my resume (IT support mostly) to see what if anything kicks back. Right now I am doing OK and can’t complain too much but it doesn’t hurt to be prepared in case things change at the office.


62 posted on 12/28/2013 5:30:09 PM PST by wally_bert (There are no winners in a game of losers. I'm Tommy Joyce, welcome to the Oriental Lounge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Cementjungle

That’s what I was thinking; since they maxed out their extended unemployment and just lost their business in June, I imagine they started the business after one or both lost their job.


63 posted on 12/28/2013 5:33:24 PM PST by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003

You forgot to add: “ Because of Obama’s economic policies”.


64 posted on 12/28/2013 5:38:12 PM PST by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: beebuster2000

It’s important to look at this on the grand scale. 1.3 million people taking a hit all at once is likely not going to have a big direct impact on the economy, but there are going to be some ripples.

To start with, unemployment over time tends to be cumulative. That is, even with a government check, they were using up a lot of the “fat” in their lives. Not just cutting back, but converting resources into cash. Everything from pawn shops to selling things on Craigslist and ebaY.

The biggest impact will be on charities, who are already feeling the strain, but it will just keep getting worse and worse.

From an economics standpoint, it would be wise to see what other ripples might be attributed to this.


65 posted on 12/28/2013 5:49:30 PM PST by yefragetuwrabrumuy (Last Obamacare Promise: "If You Like Your Eternal Soul, You Can Keep It.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jpsb

The local fast food #1 is $8. That is crazy.

Brown Bagging it is so much cheaper.


66 posted on 12/28/2013 5:54:01 PM PST by crusher2013
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: VanDeKoik
Instead of staying put in a place that cant afford, and going out to eat (WTF?), they will get help from their family, in a new location, and then go and find some work, REGARDLESS if it is up to their level.

I hear that people can collect unemployment checks for up to 99 weeks these days. That's almost two full years.

If these folks had gotten help from their family and taken lower paying jobs when they first lost their t-shirt business, they'd probably be in the black by now.

67 posted on 12/28/2013 6:51:16 PM PST by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: beebuster2000

Why don’t they consider getting a JOB!!


68 posted on 12/28/2013 6:51:21 PM PST by deweyfrank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: beebuster2000
Obama could have done something about this before signing the budget into law. I think he wants the cuts to take place because it will improve the unemployment numbers—many will find work and others will simply drop out of the statistics. But he is going to blame it on the cruel GOP.
69 posted on 12/28/2013 7:45:02 PM PST by Brad from Tennessee (A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sarasmom

Good for you ma’am!

My knowledge regarding “benefits” comes from watching politicians trade our tax money for votes and seeing what happens when they take advantage of people who are not taught the ways of citizenship, freedom and the associated personal responsibilities.

I’ve worked my whole life and never “collected” anything I haven’t earned.

I’ve been broke plenty of times, but never “poor.” ;-)


70 posted on 12/28/2013 8:02:05 PM PST by MV=PY (The Magic Question: Who's paying for it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: beebuster2000

Nobody has had their unemployment benefits run out before this?

Wow! Who knew?

I suspect folks will do what all the other folks did when their benefits ran out. They either got a job or did without.

Once again, who knew?

This isn’t something new. It’s how it has always worked. Those on unemployment now have received up to six times what others before them received. Enough already. This had to end something. It is ending now.


71 posted on 12/28/2013 9:44:41 PM PST by DoughtyOne (ZERO is still zero!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: blueunicorn6
“Dining out”? What is that?

Dumpster diving behind classy establishments - found a real treat behind Krispy Kreme the other day..

72 posted on 12/29/2013 2:40:38 AM PST by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: usconservative
Sounds like you are being unnecessarily frugal. If you make a decent living, you should be able to put some money aside for the future without having to over-sacrifice in the present. I know too many people who didn't live long enough to enjoy the fruits of their labor.

Anyway, there are plenty of jobs out there for those who are losing their unemployment benefits. Hopefully they will go back to work. Unemployment benefits should never be longer than a few weeks. When it was 99 week, most people were miraculously finding work in the 98th week! Funny how that works out.

A good barometer of the economy is the average wait time for a table at a casual restaurant chain on a Friday or Saturday night. Such as Applebees, Olive Garden or Outback. In my neck of the woods, it is still a solid hour to get a table at those times. Even on Thursday nights, it can be up to a half hour wait.

I had to cut back on my dining out but that was only because I need to cut back on my waistline. It was a bit of a shock to realize we were dining out an average of 4-5 nights a week. It does kind of sneak up on you, especially when you are surrounded by endless chains of restaurants like I am. I remember when I was growing up, dining out was a very rare treat and even then, it was usually some clam shack or pizza house.

73 posted on 12/29/2013 3:02:05 AM PST by SamAdams76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Cementjungle
I didn't know that business owners could collect unemployment. We can't and the fact that they now admitted to taking it, means they legally have to pay it back and could likely end up in jail for defrauding the system. So that is step one to calling BS on this article. Second, 'stop dining out,' really? That is not a hardship, it is a luxury. Third, oh horrors upon horrors they have to take a minimum wage job! Why not before now? You see this is what is exactly wrong with the current system! These people represent what is wrong with the attitude of ...most of America...right now. The system has enabled millions of people to remain comfortable in their poverty. And worse, it enables them in their slothfulness, which is morally wrong & sinful.
74 posted on 12/29/2013 3:14:04 AM PST by EBH ( The Day of the Patriot has arrived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: beebuster2000

I know someone who was let go at the age of 65. This person starting collecting Social Security benefits immediately, AND unemployment, with no intention of ever going back to work. That was FIVE YEARS AGO, and the unemployment checks STILL keep rolling in. On top of that, this person was given a package from the employer that included the equivalent of salary for one and a half years and was still able to collect unemployment because it was not stated as being “salary”.

And that’s just one case of abuse.


75 posted on 12/29/2013 3:16:05 AM PST by EnquiringMind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Southack

There is no way there are enough jobs to make up for those that have gone overseas in the past decades; pointing to low unemployment in low-population states is disingenuous.

The work the Joad family took in “The Grapes of Wrath” isn’t even offered to Americans anymore.


76 posted on 12/29/2013 4:33:15 AM PST by kearnyirish2 (Affirmative action is economic war against white males (and therefore white families).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: usconservative

I’m working and trying to pay down debt; I’ve done many of the things you mention, and like the fact that an unintended consequence is how much of my earnings no longer trickle down to Obama voters in fast-food places, work cafeteria, and such.


77 posted on 12/29/2013 4:38:20 AM PST by kearnyirish2 (Affirmative action is economic war against white males (and therefore white families).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Southack
...most people are stupid. And lazy.

So I see.

78 posted on 12/29/2013 6:00:38 AM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: gogeo
Really? Do you have some data to back that up?

It's based on the number of people I know who have been unemployed for a while.

Now, what evidence to you have to offer to support your belief that all long term unemployed are just moochers who don't want to work?

79 posted on 12/29/2013 6:02:09 AM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: kearnyirish2
and like the fact that an unintended consequence is how much of my earnings no longer trickle down to Obama voters in fast-food places, work cafeteria, and such.

Ding! Winner!! That's precisely why I cut back in some areas that I did. For example, I brown-bag my lunch every day (have for the last nearly 5 years now) so I can deprive the Obama fast-food workers AND the City of Chicago (Rahm Emmanuel) of the fruits of my labors. I don't buy anything in Chicago so I cannot get charged sales tax in that crap-hole Chicago where the Sales Tax is at or near 10%.

Considering it's darn difficult to eat lunch in the part of Chicago where I work for less than $8-$12 (unless one goes to McDonalds .. bleecchhh!)

Wife went so far as to calculate how much it costs to pack me a lunch every day, which came out to just under $2/day. So I'm saving @ $200/mo by simply brown bagging my lunch. That's not chump change.

80 posted on 12/29/2013 8:15:33 AM PST by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson