Posted on 12/06/2013 9:08:08 AM PST by SeekAndFind
Uh-oh. Thats the sound being uttered in doctors offices and hospitals across the country as medical providers realize theyre getting stuck with another bottomless Obamacare bill. While the White House desperately tries to pivot from the havoc wrought by the Affordable Care Act, its hidden regulatory bombs keep exploding.
I heard about the latest problem this week from an eye-doctor friend who received a letter from a Colorado-based insurer informing her that shes essentially on the hook for Obamacares payment grace period for debtors. The optometrist is bracing for a flood of similar letters from other insurers. Like countless other independent providers, shes extremely concerned about the potential liability, uncertainty, and fraud the rule imposes on her business.
Heres the raw deal: The Affordable Care Act created a 90-day grace period before insurers can drop patients who fall behind on premiums. So, delinquents who obtain tax-subsidized health insurance through an Obamacare health-insurance exchange have three months to settle up their bills prior to their policys being canceled. As written, the law puts insurers on the hook for the grace period.
But the bureaucrats at the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) decided to issue a rule in March making insurers responsible only for paying claims during the first 30 days of the debtors grace period. Whos on the hook for the other two months? Well, customers are entrusted to foot the bills for additional services. But if they blow off the payments, its up to physicians and hospitals to collect.
In real-world practice, this means providers will be eating untold costs. Several large hospital associations raised red flags over the issue this summer. In August, the Missouri Hospital Association noted that the regulatory shift unduly burdens physicians, hospitals, and other health-care providers by making them directly collect payments from patients, which puts them at an unfair and significant risk for providing uncompensated care to patients.
Emilie J DiChristina spelled out the financial risks for clients on the Practicefirst Medical Management Solutions blog: This leaves providers in a potentially bad place as they have a high potential for accruing bad debt on services provided between 31 and 90 days of the allowed grace period. Can you spell f-r-a-u-d? People could go on and off insurance plans, Tampa Bay health-care lawyer Bruce Lamb told me, and game the system by bailing on payments and exploiting Obamacare protections against denial of coverage.
Or as Missouri Hospital Association officials put it: We also are very concerned that some disreputable individuals will learn they can manipulate the system and win a full years insurance coverage on only nine months of premiums. Knowing they are entitled to three months of grace-period coverage, dishonest persons could stop paying premiums on the ninth month, enjoy free coverage during the 90-day grace period, have their coverage terminated, and then reenter the exchange market where the Affordable Care Acts guaranteed-issue mandate would prohibit another plan from denying them coverage.
Think such nefarious behavior wont occur? Then you havent been paying attention to the data manipulators and con artists in the Obamacare navigator program. As I reported earlier this year, the seedy nonprofit Seedco secured multimillion-dollar navigator contracts in Georgia, Maryland, Tennessee, and New York to recruit Obamacare recipients into the government-run exchanges despite settling a civil-fraud lawsuit for faking at least 1,400 of 6,500 job placements under a $22.2 million federally funded contract with New York City a year ago.
Additionally, investigative journalist James OKeefe and his Project Veritas team have caught Obamacare navigators on tape advising health-insurance-exchange customers to underreport their income and lie about their health status in order to cheat the system.
CMS has made no effort to repeal its cost-shifting rule or to do anything to address the concerns of providers who will be left holding the bag. As one hospital rep told me: Its potentially catastrophic. Private practices are already being hit hard with slashed reimbursements, the electronic-medical-records mandate, ICD-10 medical-diagnostic-code changes, and increasing federal intrusions on how they provide care. In yet another entry on the laundry list of Obamacares unintended consequences, this regulation will hurt patients by dissuading doctors from participating in exchange plans.
In short: less choice, higher prices, increased potential for fraud, more bureaucratic headaches, and more disincentives to enter or stay in the medical profession. When the government grants grace, everyone must watch their wallets. Its always easy to afford compassion when someone else is paying for it.
Michelle Malkin is the author of Culture of Corruption: Obama and His Team of Tax Cheats, Crooks, and Cronies
Why oh why am I not surprised by this?
bump
destroy the system
the whole point from the start
Question:
Does the law make providers accept the 0-Care patients or can they refuse services to them?..............
Ya think this might be another way to force single-payer on all of us?
Is this EVERY provider or just for the o-care exchanges?
If the second one then this could be quite bad for Obamacare, doctors flee exchanges
I sure hope the Congress and John Roberts have a nice Christmas.....
It’s all about the forced redistribution of wealth.
Wipe out the capital creators and you wipe out capitalism.
Obama Flowers - Have you ordered yours yet?
(Receptionist) Hello, Welcome to ObamaFlowers, My name is Trina. How can I help you?
(Customer) Hello, I received an email from Professional Flowers stating that my flower order has been canceled and I should go to your exchange to reorder it. I tried your website, but it seems like it is not working. So I am calling the 800 number.
(Receptionist) Yes, I am sorry about the website. It should be fixed by the end of November or maybe December. But I can help you.
(Customer) Thanks, I ordered a “Spring Bouquet” for our anniversary, and wanted it delivered to my wife.
(Receptionist Interrupting) Sir, “Spring Bouquets” do not meet our minimum standards, I will be happy to provide you with Red Roses.
(Customer) But I have always ordered “Spring Bouquets”, done it for years, my wife likes them.
(Receptionist) Roses are better, sir. I am sure your wife will love them.
(Customer) Well, how much are they?
(Receptionist) It depends sir, do you want our Bronze, Silver, Gold or Platinum package.
(Customer) What’s the difference?
(Receptionist) 6, 12,18 or 24 Red Roses.
(Customer) The Silver package may be okay, how much is it?
(Receptionist) It depends sir, what is you monthly income?
(Customer) What does that have to do with anything?
(Receptionist) I need that to determine your government flower subsidy, then I can determine how much your out of pocket cost will be. But if your income is below our minimums for a subsidy, then I can refer you to our FlowerAid department.
(Customer) FlowerAid?
(Receptionist) Yes, Flowers are a Right, everyone has a right to flowers. So, if you can’t afford them, then the government will supply them free of charge.
(Customer) Who said they were a Right?
(Receptionist) Congress passed it, the President signed it and the Supreme Court found it Constitutional.
(Customer) Whoa.....I don’t remember seeing anything in the Constitution regarding Flowers as a Right.
(Receptionist) It is not really a Right in the Constitution, but ObamaFlowers is Constitutional because the Supreme Court Ruled it a “Tax”. Taxes are Constitutional. But we feel it is a Right.
(Customer) I don’t believe this...
(Receptionist) It’s the law of the land sir. Now, we anticipated most people would go for the Silver Package, so what is you monthly income sir?
(Customer) Forget it, I think I will forgo the flowers this year.
(Receptionist) In that case sir, I will still need your monthly income.
(Customer) Why?
(Receptionist) To determine what your ‘non-participation’ cost would be.
(Customer) WHAT? Your can’t charge me for NOT buying flowers!
(Receptionist) It’s the law of the land, sir, approved by the Supreme Court. It’s $9.50 or 1% of your monthly income.....
(Customer)interrupting) This is ridiculous, I’ll pay the $9.50..
(Receptionist) Sir, it is the $9.50 or 1% of your monthly income, whichever is greater.
(Customer) ARE YOU KIDDING ME? What a ripoff!!
(Receptionist) Actually sir, it is a good deal. Next year it will be 2%.
(Customer) Look, I’m going to call my Congressman to find out what’s going on here. This is ridiculous. I’m not going to pay it.
(Receptionist) Sorry to hear that sir, that’s why I had the NSA track this call and obtain the make and model of the cell phone your are using.
(Customer) Why does the NSA need to know what kind of CELL PHONE I AM USING?
(Receptionist) So they get your GPS coordinates sir
(Door Bell rings followed immediately by a loud knock on the door)
(Receptionist) That would be the IRS sir. Thanks for calling ObamaFlowers, have a nice day...and God
Yep - good thing they passed that law so we can now see what’s in it — a really ugly jack-in-the-box comes to mind.
The medical business needs a service that tracks deadbeat patients. Any patient who fails to pay the bill goes on the blacklist. Refuse service. Cleaning up your bad medical credit by paying the provider is the remedy available to get off tthe list. Make the service a national registry to prevent moving to a new state to start the fraud again.
Why oh why am I not surprised by this?
____________________________________________________________
Why oh why am I so happy about this? Schadenfreud!
Not sympathetic. They supported this mess. Now they can pay the price.
Getting a degree as a Doctor is the easy part. Figuring out how to fill out all of the Government forms and requirements is the hard part.
Not to split hairs....but unpaid bills always got dumped on the providers.
And now this? Anyone can sign up, pay one month's premium, and pile on the care for three months. Heck, they might as well get a low deductible plan.
FWIW, I had a dental extraction done by a dentist who does a lot of cosmetic work. She doesn't even take insurance. Her secretary will fill out forms after the fact so the person can apply to their insurance company. It doesn't sound like Obamacare allows that.
Stupidity, Incompetance or Sinister Plan.
Take your choice.
They knew there would be massive gaming of the system. They know people will seek their best interest, financially.
The administration promised to make the insurers whole, no matter what. They can’t afford for providers to take a hot, so they will also be made whole.
Therefore, massive health system gaming by all; paid for by taxpayers. Massive deficits, but that does not matter until it is too late.
All this to enable personal irresponsibility.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.