Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rise in Unprotected Sex by Gay Men Spurs H.I.V. Fears
New York Times ^ | November 27, 2013 | DONALD G. McNEIL Jr.

Posted on 11/28/2013 7:14:05 AM PST by reaganaut1

Federal health officials are reporting a sharp increase in unprotected sex among gay American men, a development that makes it harder to fight the AIDS epidemic.

The same trend has recently been documented among gay men in Canada, Britain, the Netherlands, France and Australia, heightening concerns among public health officials worldwide.

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the number of men who told federal health investigators that they had had unprotected anal sex in the last year rose nearly 20 percent from 2005 to 2011. In the 2011 survey, unprotected sex was more than twice as common among men who said they did not know whether they were infected with H.I.V.

Being tested even once for H.I.V. is associated with men taking fewer risks, whether the test is positive or negative, health experts say. But the most recent survey found that a third of the men interviewed had not been tested in the past year.

The findings are worrying because “unprotected anal intercourse is in a league of its own as far as risk is concerned,” Dr. Thomas R. Frieden, director of the disease centers, said on Wednesday as the figures were released.

The data, published in the agency’s Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, do not explain why unprotected sex has risen so rapidly, but a leading hypothesis, Dr. Frieden said, is that more men are “sero-sorting” — that is, those who are uninfected (“H.I.V. seronegative” on lab reports) try to sleep only with other men who are uninfected, or who hope they are, or who merely promise they are.

“The problem with sero-sorting is that it’s really easy to get it wrong,” Dr. Frieden said. “When one-third of men aren’t even tested in the last year

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aids; analsex; buggery; fdrq; homosexualagenda; homosexuals; sodomy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last
A society cannot recognize "gay marriage" and at the same time condemn sodomy, buggery, or whatever you want to call it. Even conservative publications like National Review rarely make this obvious argument. The comment about buggery being in "in a league of its own as far as risk is concerned" is consistent with what Bush's nominee for surgeon general, James W. Holsinger, wrote in a paper Pathophysiology of Male Homosexuality .
1 posted on 11/28/2013 7:14:05 AM PST by reaganaut1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Here’s an Obama-worthy crisis.


2 posted on 11/28/2013 7:15:36 AM PST by Steely Tom (If the Constitution can be a living document, I guess a corporation can be a person.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

And, of course, the taxpayers are called upon to furnish their medical treatment.


3 posted on 11/28/2013 7:16:05 AM PST by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Self non-preservation.

Works for me.


4 posted on 11/28/2013 7:16:53 AM PST by moovova
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

5 posted on 11/28/2013 7:18:34 AM PST by Jeff Chandler (Obamacare: You can't make an omelette without breaking a few eggs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

The poop chute doesn’t have the proper epithelium for this sort of activity.

Columnar epithelium is much more fragile than the stratified squamous type found in the vaginal wall.


6 posted on 11/28/2013 7:20:55 AM PST by gasport (Will operate for food.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hammer

Yes. We need one of those Obamacare ads, like the one with the heterosexual hook uppers, for the sodomites. Engage in high risk, unnatural sex? Don’t worry. You’re covered! PUKE!


7 posted on 11/28/2013 7:21:37 AM PST by CitizenUSA (Democrats. The only constitutional rights they believe in are sodomy and abortion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
Filthy Disease Ridden Queers sharing their disease by choice...
8 posted on 11/28/2013 7:22:11 AM PST by Chode (Stand UP and Be Counted, or line up and be numbered - *DTOM* -vvv- NO Pity for the LAZY - 86-44)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

... giving them over to a depraved mind ...


9 posted on 11/28/2013 7:23:53 AM PST by dartuser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gasport

My comment isn’t homophobic. It’s basic histology.


10 posted on 11/28/2013 7:23:58 AM PST by gasport (Will operate for food.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

I thought we had all been indoctrinated to consider anal sex to be a safe and normal alternate lifestyle.

Are they now claiming that this kind of behavior is risky or otherwise not normal?


11 posted on 11/28/2013 7:24:59 AM PST by P-Marlowe (There can be no Victory without a fight and no battle without wounds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hammer

It is even worse than you know.

With this drive to convince us that homosexuality is “normal”, they will assert they have a right to unprotected sex. The fact that they acquire a lethal disease from doing so will just prove that they are the victims of discrimination.

And we will be portrayed as the persecutors in this farce.

Can’t you just see the MSM articles, all sympathetic to these talented paragons of whatever that are being cut down in the prime of life? They will demand that society provide them a “safe” way to engage in unprotected buggery.

They used exactly this argument in demanding that society come up with a way to treat AIDS.


12 posted on 11/28/2013 7:25:03 AM PST by RedElement
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RedElement; CitizenUSA

Yes, it’s come to that - they have the right to destroy themselves, and then send us the bill.


13 posted on 11/28/2013 7:28:07 AM PST by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Obamacare charges more for smokers... maybe gays should pay more too.


14 posted on 11/28/2013 7:28:28 AM PST by GOPJ ("Remember who the real enemy is... ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

***...a development that makes it harder to fight the AIDS epidemic. ***

And why not! They got OBAMACARE to pay for their medication!

which I believe is the main reason Obamacare was forced on the public.


15 posted on 11/28/2013 7:31:24 AM PST by Ruy Dias de Bivar (Sometimes you need 7+ more ammo. LOTS MORE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
Drugs to treat HIV are very expensive.
About 2% of the population are especially at risk for HIV.
I bet that Obamacare provides fully funded HIV maintenance funding for 100% of all Americans.
16 posted on 11/28/2013 7:36:08 AM PST by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gasport
Exactly. I read news reports of gay men who have to wear adult diapers because their rectum is so collapsed to the point where fecal matter continuously pops out.
17 posted on 11/28/2013 7:36:27 AM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Governor Sarah Heath Palin for President of the United States in 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: gasport

Yes, I guess so. However, rather intellectually scatological if there can be such a thing :)


18 posted on 11/28/2013 7:37:41 AM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

"Everyone Has AIDS...."

19 posted on 11/28/2013 7:37:57 AM PST by dfwgator (Fire Muschamp.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

That comes from Gerbils, fisting, and buttplugs, I’m assuming.


20 posted on 11/28/2013 7:38:40 AM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson