Posted on 07/10/2013 11:47:14 AM PDT by EXCH54FE
Congressman Kenny Marchant (R-TX), whose district includes several areas around Dallas and Ft. Worth and who is a member of the House Committee on Ways and Means and its Subcommittee on Oversight, received a letter from a reader over at Obama Release Your Records, who goes by the name of “Dougster” venting his frustration and desire for articles of impeachment to be brought against Barack Hussein Obama. Marchant replied, stating that Obama is “under the most scrutiny” and being investigated by the House, the Senate and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI).
Marchant indicated that as he views what is taking place with the investigations it is important for him to know the views and concerns of his constituents.
“I share your outrage over the multiple scandals involving the Internal Revenue Service, the State Department, the Department of Health and Human Services, the Department of Justice, and other agencies under this Administration,” he wrote. “Each is alarming and each warrants a high degree of scrutiny.”
He went on to elaborate that when articles of impeachment are introduced, the House Judiciary Committee has jurisdiction to consider theme and collect critical information. From there, they would decide whether to move forward with charges that amount to “treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.”
If those things were settled, those articles of impeachment would then be presented to the House for a vote and, if passed, be sent to the Senate where a 2/3 majority vote would be required to remove Obama from office. Frankly, unless the Democrats believe they are going to be taken down with Obama that is not likely to happen.
“There are currently investigations underway in the House, the Senate, and at the FBI to gather as much information from the Administration as possible.
(Excerpt) Read more at freedomoutpost.com ...
No, he is a realist.
Until the Senate is gained impeachment accomplishes nothing.
i would hope for a Caligula like solution imposed by the palace guard.
Even if the House impeaches (charges) Obama, the Senate will refuse to even hear any evidence, much less convict him.
The FBI? bwahahahahahaha. Yeah right. Sure.
That would be okay : )
Oh so naive.
The Senate doesn't have the option of not trying the case and hearing the evidence. It's Constitutionally mandated that they do so. Voting to convict and remove, well, that's another story.
Maybe the military will have to do it, a la Egyp t; and if they did, might that be worse? Since all the REAL Generals have been squeezed out? Inquiring minds want to know./Sarc
My sentiment exactly. Just like 'The most transparent admin ever..', 'The most scandal-free admin ever...', and 'The press is harder on Obama than any other President...'
Pure BS...
“The Senate doesn’t have the option of not trying the case and hearing the evidence. “
The Senate refused to hear evidence about Clinton’s perjury and subornation of perjury.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3040846/posts?page=3#3
Post #3 has a copy of letter to a constituent from marchant concerning this.
Says house, senate, and FBI is investigating 0.
Huma Abedin, Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood daughter, also needs to be investigated. Hell, she was advising the Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton. Despite what Hillary says, Benghazi does matter and matter big time.
He isn’t eligible.
And he is a mozlem radical.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.