Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Near the end of the article is this:

"Under Florida law, a person can lawfully shoot somebody in self-defense to prevent their own death or great bodily harm."

With a guy on top of you, beating your head against the pavement, who would not fear for their life?

1 posted on 06/09/2013 2:34:44 PM PDT by Ron C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Ron C.

If you think he will get a FAIR trial, I got some property in West Texas from where you can see the Brooklyn Bridge, you need to buy from me. $1 an acre.


2 posted on 06/09/2013 2:39:55 PM PDT by Bibman (Tea Party since 1976)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ron C.

Debunking the stand your ground myth

Whatever happened on the night that George Zimmerman shot Trayvon Martin, we know one thing for sure: The gun prohibition lobbies and their compliant media friends have been deceiving the public about Florida’s laws. Among the many deceits is the claim that Florida’s “stand your ground” law affects the legality of whatever Mr. Zimmerman did.

The assertion that Florida law allows shooting whenever someone believes it to be necessary is a flat-out lie. The actual law of Florida is that “a person is justified in the use of deadly force” if “(1) He or she reasonably believes that such force is necessary to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another or to prevent the imminent commission of a forcible felony” (Florida Statutes, Section 776.012).

The second part of the law provides special provisions for self-defense against violent home invaders or carjackers. Neither of those is relevant to the Zimmerman case.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/apr/2/debunking-the-stand-your-ground-myth/


3 posted on 06/09/2013 2:40:49 PM PDT by TurboZamboni (Marx smelled bad & lived with his parents most his life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ron C.

Did they finally manage to find enough kangaroos for this court?


4 posted on 06/09/2013 2:41:25 PM PDT by Mr. K (There are lies, damned lies, statistics, and democrat talking points.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ron C.
Zimmerman says Martin grabbed the gun first and fired????

Who wrote this crap?

5 posted on 06/09/2013 2:42:28 PM PDT by SWAMPSNIPER (The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not a Matter of Opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ron C.

That we even need a law that states that is about the most insane thing I ever heard. It’s like saying “You have the right not to get killed” Oh really? Well thank you for informing me of that. I was all set to get killed next time I get mugged.

On the other hand I guess it is a necessary law being that liberals are telling Zimmerman he did *not* have the right to defend his life. He should have accepted his death “like a man”. This world just gets more and more insane doesn’t it.


6 posted on 06/09/2013 2:43:22 PM PDT by GrandJediMasterYoda (Someday our schools will teach the difference between "lose" and "loose")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ron C.

The trial is a sham. George Zimmerman clearly acted in self-defense and Travon Martin simply picked on the wrong guy to assault that fateful night. The local police had no intention of arresting Zimmerman but once the leftmedia glommed onto the story and played up the race angle, the Florida state prosecutor felt compelled to charge Zimmerman. As the trial begins, the race hustlers will be out in force, sending a pointed message that the ‘right’ verdict must be delivered or riots will ensue. We can only hope and pray that the jury will show some integrity (and guts) by acquitting Zimmerman but I’m not optimistic - and that is what saddens me about this case.


7 posted on 06/09/2013 2:44:37 PM PDT by Jim Scott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ron C.

MSNBC has stated that they want to “own” this trial...in an attempt to get their rating back out of the toilet..Al Sharpton will be presenting a balanced overview of each day’s proceedings on his 6PM show..and he has hired Tawana Brawley as his inside the courtroom reporter..


8 posted on 06/09/2013 2:54:59 PM PDT by ken5050 (Due to all the WH scandals, MSNBC is changing its slogan from "Lean Forward" to "BOHICA")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ron C.
What vote by a jury is necessary for conviction in this case, unanimous or some lesser number?
12 posted on 06/09/2013 3:00:14 PM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ron C.

“Under Florida law, a person can lawfully shoot somebody in self-defense to prevent their own death or great bodily harm.”

Case dismissed!


15 posted on 06/09/2013 3:01:26 PM PDT by doc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ron C.
The jury pool is ready:
26 posted on 06/09/2013 3:32:20 PM PDT by Dalberg-Acton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ron C.

The actual trial, arguments and evidence will not affect the verdict. The only thing that is going to matter is the jury selection. Sad to say that’s the way it is in America today.


28 posted on 06/09/2013 3:37:39 PM PDT by ElkGroveDan (My tagline is in the shop.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ron C.

30 posted on 06/09/2013 3:40:32 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (I'll raise $2million for Sarah Palin's next run. What'll you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ron C.
If Zimmerman wailed, he must not be jailed.

Does 911 tape prove George Zimmerman acted in self-defense?

33 posted on 06/09/2013 3:52:54 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("Forget it, Jake. It's Eric Holder's people.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ron C.
With a guy on top of you, beating your head against the pavement, who would not fear for their life?

The witnesses who said they saw that will soon recant, for fear of their very lives.

34 posted on 06/09/2013 3:57:22 PM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ron C.

Note the AP contributed to this story.


36 posted on 06/09/2013 4:13:18 PM PDT by Williams (No Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ron C.

St. Skittles vs. The White Hispanic

Welcome to OJ Simpson #2 — “If da’ dude be white, ya’ convict, ‘ayt?!”


42 posted on 06/09/2013 5:08:27 PM PDT by twister881
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ron C.

“Getting into a fight..” Is that how you describe being sucker punched?


46 posted on 06/09/2013 5:44:13 PM PDT by SampleMan (Feral Humans are the refuse of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ron C.

Well that headline is sure “fair and balanced” /sarc


48 posted on 06/09/2013 6:55:06 PM PDT by lightman (Buzzed and buggered bath house Barry: the Benghazi bungler.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ron C.

“Under Florida law, a person can lawfully shoot somebody in self-defense to prevent their own death or great bodily harm.”


And it is up to the prosecution to prove, BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT, that that is not what happened. I would not want to be on that team unless every palm in the jury was heavily greased.


52 posted on 06/10/2013 6:50:00 AM PDT by cuban leaf (Were doomed! Details at eleven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ron C.

Seeing this is a Fox article, I wanted to ask this question...Has Fox abandoned George Zimmerman?

Hannitty has not mentioned George for weeks. For sure Mark O`mera would have loved/wanted to be interviewed on his show

Fox most definitely had been planning on actually covering a lot of major hours of the trial, but now because of ratings bonanza on all Obama scandals, doubtful they will show more than a few moments a day.

Even here, I dont see any front page news story, or under breaking news...yes the reg faithful like Uncle Chip etc,
But, seems as if its taking back seat.

A lot of Fox coverage has been from prosecution point of view, Meagan Kelly has already tried and convicted him, I have no use for her

Fox attitude towards George may be a bit phony, was like we got your back George, but now you are on your own because we cant squeeze you in because of Obama scandals

Just how I see it, dont think Fox is going to cover it other than some talk over with trial in background for few moments on the hour at best, not as they had originally planned

Just how I see it


54 posted on 06/10/2013 8:27:48 AM PDT by Friendofgeorge (SARAH PALIN 2016 OR BUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson