Skip to comments.
BREAKING: CA Senate Votes to Ban All Semi-Automatic Rifles With Detachable Magazines
The Truth About Guns.com
| 29 May 2013
| Robert Farago
Posted on 05/30/2013 3:51:28 PM PDT by Windflier
After Connecticut upped the anti ante, The Golden State Senate is doing its level best to reclaim its title as Americas number one slave state. To that end, The California Senate on Wednesday approved a package of seven gun control bills, including background checks for people who buy ammunition, introduced in response to the massacre at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn. Well, the latimes.com would say that wouldnt they? Not to mention burying the big kahuna in the tenth paragraph. The Senate also approved a bill that would outlaw the sale, purchase and manufacture in California of semiautomatic rifles that can accept detachable magazines. SB 374 also would require those who own such weapons to register them with the state. Welcome back my friends to the nightmare that never ends. More details in the morning.
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; US: California
KEYWORDS: banglist; california; guncontrol; gungrabbers; secondamendment; vanity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-91 next last
To: Windflier
Treason is popular among California politicians. This is clearly unconstitutional, and I hope defending this law bankrupts their government before it is overturned. Evil should be punished - the voters who supported these nutcases, along with the petty tyrants who wrote this terrible law.
41
posted on
05/30/2013 4:40:13 PM PDT
by
Pollster1
("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
To: Windflier
Guess that means that M1 Garand Rifles will be HOT Selling.
42
posted on
05/30/2013 4:43:13 PM PDT
by
SandRat
(Duty - Honor - Country! What else needs said?)
To: SandRat
The Tanker doesn’t have the accuracy of the standard issue Garand, but for urban warfare it will get the job done and then some.
43
posted on
05/30/2013 4:46:47 PM PDT
by
Sirius Lee
(All that is required for evil to advance is for government to do "something")
To: Pollster1
44
posted on
05/30/2013 4:56:16 PM PDT
by
Windflier
(To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
To: Wildbill22
I am glad I am not living in CA, but it should alarm everyone how unconstitutional these State laws are getting. This may end badly. I've been trying to convince my eldest son of that fact for years now. He was a Rush baby who wound up voting for Obama (after I moved to Texas).
I've told him that California is headed for armaggedon, but what do I know? I'm just a 60 year old Freeper who follows the socio/political situation in this country closer than 90% of the public.
45
posted on
05/30/2013 5:03:32 PM PDT
by
Windflier
(To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
To: Red Steel
Unconstitutional via US v. Miller and then recited in DC v. Heller. Let us hope that this abomination is shot down by a federal court for that reason.
46
posted on
05/30/2013 5:04:20 PM PDT
by
Windflier
(To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
To: Windflier
Another good reason for Conservatives and Libertarians to leave that anti-American hell-hole and move to the Free United States.
47
posted on
05/30/2013 5:05:11 PM PDT
by
EricT.
(Another Muslim terrorist. Who saw that coming?)
To: chesty_puller
Im ashamed that I was born there. You too? I threw in the towel at 52 and pulled up stakes for Texas. It was one of the best decisions of my life.
48
posted on
05/30/2013 5:05:55 PM PDT
by
Windflier
(To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
To: AEMILIUS PAULUS
Those in California government know they are treading upon us. They will move heaven and earth to confiscate any and all guns. That is their goal up the road. Their fellow travelers in Washington are on exactly the same page. We must, and we will, resist!
49
posted on
05/30/2013 5:08:14 PM PDT
by
Windflier
(To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
To: Sir_Ed
They also passed a $50 background-check fee to buy ammo! Un-frikken-believable...
50
posted on
05/30/2013 5:08:59 PM PDT
by
Windflier
(To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
To: LouAvul
Transport it out of CA to a state where it is legal. Establish residency in that state. Sell it as you see fit.
51
posted on
05/30/2013 5:09:00 PM PDT
by
Myrddin
To: fr_freak
If you would venture outside CA once in a while, you’d find out that most Democrats in a lot of the country are more conservative than the CalGOP, and the CalDonks are farther left than the old Soviet Duma.
52
posted on
05/30/2013 5:10:31 PM PDT
by
EricT.
(Another Muslim terrorist. Who saw that coming?)
To: Hot Tabasco
That state is lost and how any of their residents here can still support it is beyond me.... Being a native Californio, I understand people's natural desire to stand up for the place. There is still much good there, but all of it is rapidly being overwhelmed by an encroaching tide of leftist droids and illegals. That's the reality.
53
posted on
05/30/2013 5:12:04 PM PDT
by
Windflier
(To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
To: Windflier
Remington Nylon 66 .22 with a tubular magazine.....
To: Sirius Lee
Even if using standard Ball Ammo. Using AP ammo might be over kill.
55
posted on
05/30/2013 5:18:46 PM PDT
by
SandRat
(Duty - Honor - Country! What else needs said?)
56
posted on
05/30/2013 5:20:50 PM PDT
by
phockthis
(http://www.supremelaw.org/fedzone11/index.htm ...)
To: Windflier
Commiefornya was once a great state. Only a miracle will turn it around.
To: PA Engineer
“What stupidity and evil. That would make most hunting rifles illegal, including the Remington 700.”
I dont think the mag ban applies to bolt action rifles.
58
posted on
05/30/2013 5:35:09 PM PDT
by
Brooklyn Attitude
(Obama being re-elected is the political equivalent of OJ being found not guilty.)
To: Windflier
Wow, even police can’t have them?
59
posted on
05/30/2013 5:36:12 PM PDT
by
AppyPappy
(Obama: What did I not know and when did I not know it?)
To: Windflier
“Shall not be infringed”
Patently Unconstitutional.
State laws cannot trump the Constitution. Imagine is CA required people to house soldiers. Or if they banned freedom of speech/assembly. How far would those last?
60
posted on
05/30/2013 5:39:32 PM PDT
by
Red in Blue PA
(When Injustice becomes Law, Resistance Becomes Duty.-Thomas Jefferson)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-91 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson