Posted on 05/15/2013 3:12:39 PM PDT by presidio9
The renewed interest in the Sept. 11, 2012, attack at the U.S. post in Benghazi, Libya, has not shaken Hillary Clinton’s position among potential 2016 contenders, according to a new poll.
The former secretary of state — under fire by conservatives who say she played politics with the attack in which Ambassador Chris Stevens and three others were killed — still leads the potential 2016 Democratic field with 63 percent of the vote in her party, according to a Public Policy Polling poll released Wednesday.
Vice President Joe Biden comes in at second with 13 percent. No other candidate polled higher than 4 percent. The poll was conducted between May 6 and May 9, 2013 — just as the hearings on the Hill were heating up.
“Benghazi isn’t having much impact on Hillary Clinton’s viability in a potential 2016 campaign,” said PPP President Dean Debnam in a statement. “She continues to lead the Democratic field and the top Republican candidate possibilities.”
Last month, PPP had Clinton leading with 64 percent.
Among GOP-ers, its
(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...
On top of whom, Huma?
Of course she’s still on top... the commies don’t have anyone else.
LOL..Huma seems like the type that would want to be on top..Hillary prefers being on the bottom
Typical. She could commit murder and still poll high. Why are people so numb to incompetence?
Why wouldn’t the Anti-Christ, Anti-American Party love her?
Polls this far out basically test name recognition.
Who said it?
1) “We’re going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good.”
A. Karl Marx
B. Adolph Hitler
C. Joseph Stalin
D. None of the above
2) “It’s time for a new beginning, for an end to government of the few, by the few, and for the few...... And to replace it with shared responsibility for shared prosperity.”
A. Lenin
B. Mussolini
C. Idi Amin
D. None of the Above
3) “(We) .....can’t just let business as usual go on, and that means something has to be taken away from some people.”
A. Nikita Khrushev
B. Josef Goebbels
C. Boris Yeltsin
D. None of the above
4) “We have to build a political consensus and that requires people to give up a little bit of their own ... in order to create this common ground.”
A. Mao Tse Dung
B. Hugo Chavez
C. Kim Jong Il
D. None of the above
5) “I certainly think the free-market has failed.”
A. Karl Marx
B. Lenin
C. Molotov
D. None of the above
6) “I think it’s time to send a clear message to what has become the most profitable sector in (the) entire economy that they are being watched.”
A. Pinochet
B. Milosevic
C. Saddam Hussein
D. None of the above
Scroll down for answers
Answers:
(1) D. None of the above. Statement was made by Hillary Clinton 6/29/2004
(2) D. None of the above. Statement was made by Hillary Clinton 5/29/2007
(3) D. None of the above. Statement was made by Hillary Clinton 6/4/2007
(4) D. None of the above. Statement was made by Hillary Clinton 6/4/2007
(5) D. None of the above. Statement was made by Hillary Clinton 6/4/2007
(6) D. None of the above. Statement was made by Hillary Clinton 9/2/2005
A Surprised? Not really!!! and this was before she fell and hit her head!!! And the Democrats want to nominate her for President in 2016!
Good!
The only ones who will support her are the freepers who oppose EVERY GOP nominee since this sites creation.
IOW, "The half of America that matters still doesn't give a rat's ass about Benghazi and never will."
>>The only ones who will support her are the freepers who oppose EVERY GOP nominee since this sites creation<<
Ronald Reagan would have been crucified here.
And from what I am reading (no specific links now) I was right — had so many “Conservatives” not decided they would stay home and eat worms Romney would have won. Romney was far from the best candidate but he was the FAR BETTER candidate compared to the obozo to whom we handed the election.
And the GOP will not beat any of them if they continue to push Illegal Alien Amnesty....heck Obama could be double date with Ariel Castro and the Dems will still beat Amnesty Liberal GOP
So, the libs are gonna pull out all the stops to save her skin. I predict they are even willing to throw Obama under the bus if that's what it takes to save her viability. We may already be seeing some of that. The harder the press pushes the IRS the farther back they push the Benghazi story.
Allow me to correct you: It is the people here who oppose the viable candidates who actually might win a nomination and a national election in favor of the not-a-snowball’s-chance-in-hell types who pass every litmus test and then throw a temper tantrum when their guy loses. If conservatives had gotten behind Newt Gingrich early I still believe he would have exposed Barak Obama for who he is and won the election. Would he have been the perfect conservative? Of course not. But he would have taken the fight to Obama because he is not one bit concerned with wether people like him as a person or not.
2000 was a strange election year because voters were still getting over a distasteful Democrat incombant. From now on (unless the current scandal continues to metasticize), every time we nominate a “nice guy” candidate we will lose.
Webb Hubbel would know...
This planet is not big enough for liberals and conservatives.
They expect to start with the ‘first woman president’ excrement. It’ll work for the feminazis and the remaining people with their heads still up their a$$es.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.