Posted on 05/14/2013 1:25:38 PM PDT by chessplayer
CNN has obtained an e-mail sent by a top aide to President Barack Obama about White House reaction to the deadly attack last September 11 on the U.S. diplomatic compound in Benghazi, Libya, that apparently differs from how sources characterized it to two different media organizations.
The actual e-mail from then-Deputy National Security Adviser for Strategic Communications Ben Rhodes appears to show that whomever leaked it did so in a way that made it appear that the White House was primarily concerned with the State Department's desire to remove references and warnings about specific terrorist groups so as to not bring criticism to the department.
(Excerpt) Read more at thelead.blogs.cnn.com ...
Who gave the STAND DOWN order?
Why did Obama go to sleep with an attack happening?
Who are the 30+ survivors and where are they now?
Why was Tyrone Woods painting a target?
Issuing it is his job, his responsibility.
However, the word is that Donilon issued the STAND DOWN ORDER.
Are you being sarcastic?
Ben Rhodes.. The brother of the President of CBS Ben Rhodes?
Distinctions Stricken for Comparison Purposes
Original Text Retained in Bold.
AS OBTAINED BY CNN (Pre-Damage Control Mode?):
Sorry to be late to this discussion. We need to resolve this in a way that respects all of the relevant equities, particularly the investigation.
There is a ton of wrong information getting out into the public domain from Congress and people who are not particularly informed. Insofar as we have firmed up assessments that dont compromise intel or the investigation, we need to have the capability to correct the record, as there are significant policy and messaging ramifications that would flow from a hardened mis-impression.
We can take this up tomorrow morning at deputies.
AS LEAKED TO ABC (In damage control mode?):
We must make sure that the talking points reflect all agency equities, including those of the State Department, and we dont want to undermine the FBI investigation. We thus will work through the talking points tomorrow morning at the Deputies Committee meeting.
Carney kinda flailed around about altered emails. Need to see what was said on the live thread. My memory is that it referred to wrongly attributing something to Hillary whose sig is automatically added to certain communications even some she does not personally see.
This “exclusive” sets a new high bar for convoluted. Why did you add (we are so screwed)?
I read the Email and my BS meter sounded loudly. If this “E-mail” wasn’t written AFTER the last hearing, I’ll eat my shorts.
McDonough was in charge during the Bin Laden incident. He is the man in this picture who is in the COMMAND seat between the General and The Secretary of State (hillary).
No need to read further -CNN
What are you talking about?
Nothing contradicts the fact that top 0bambi admin. officials kept pushing the B.S. video story. And nothing absolves the CiC from gross negligence at the very least.
I’m not following your point. Think this Email was written recently as part of the cover-up and not immediately after the attack? I do.
Sooooooo...what happened to that FBI "investigation" anyway?
What do the talking points have to do with leaving thirty people to die? What do the talking points have to do with lying about a video? What do the talking points on Benghazi have to do with the IRS scandal or the AP scandal?
Answer...NOTHING!
If someone in the GOP altered those emails, that will make people reject ANYTHING the GOP says. Thats why it matters. When Tapper says something like this I begin to worry.
The talking points have been a wild goose chase, the “safe” conversation between the press and WH. They did not cause the death of four Americans. They didnt explain why after repeated requests for more security, there was less. They had nothing to do with why forces were told to stand down. They do not disclose what actions the president did or didn’t take that night. They have been a trap.
Well, my attempt was lame.
I guess I just called out the differences. Draw your own conclusions.
Who you workin’ for, Chessplayer? CNN?
Ah, it’s a little too late to set up the patsy. That has to be done as the event is occurring. Are we going to see some fake FBI report stating that the GOP altered e-mails?
Maybe Rush did it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.