Posted on 05/04/2013 12:59:27 PM PDT by bryan999
Their identities have been a well-guarded secret, known only to their high-powered lawyers and a handful of House lawmakers and staff. But now Fox News has learned the names of the self-described Benghazi whistleblowers who are set to testify before a widely anticipated congressional hearing on Wednesday.
Appearing before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee will be three career State Department officials: Gregory N. Hicks, the deputy chief of mission at the U.S. Embassy in Libya at the time of the Benghazi terrorist attacks; Mark I. Thompson, a former Marine and now the deputy coordinator for Operations in the agencys Counterterrorism Bureau; and Eric Nordstrom, a diplomatic security officer who was the regional security officer in Libya, the top security officer in the country in the months leading up to the attacks.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
May God protect them.
In answer to ther image question: because she is black and female. The regime plays the race card and the female card in hopes that they’ve found the trump suit. Truth means nothing to this regime nor tot he democrip party for which this lying, fraudulent bastard child is the spokesgoon.
No doubt. Pathetic isn’t it. That’s what liEberals and cowardly pols have brought us to.
“So I was part of one of the most corrupt Presidential administrations in history, had more “gates” than a prison, accomplished absolutely nothing as Senator, was an unmitigated disaster as Secretary of state, WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE? I’m running for PRESIDENT!”
Yes I too would like to here from them. I doubt the three mentioned will be giving up to many answers we want. I think we will be disappointed by their testimony.
it’s so long ago what difference does it make.
I honestly hate e radical left wing scum bags today
Everything that was going on in Benghazi is classified.
One of the whistleblowers’s lawyer was on a local DC station Friday morning. Apparently Congressional hearings do not allow for people to testify anonymously. Their names have to be announced at least 3 days before they testify.
They do absolutely nothing but destroy and they media defends and promotes them up and they destroy some more. They’re like flesh eating bacteria.
Lets call them ‘Patriots’ - not whistleblowers
What difference does it make? It makes a difference to the people back home in the USA. Also to those families whom lost a loved one and the survivors of the attack. I well remember the Lebanon Barracks in 1983 when the building was bombed. But there were years that I was in a fog because of the injuries suffered. In 1995, I well remember the hell in Oklahoma City when the Church meeting was interrupted by the sound of an explosion in the distance.
personally I have grown tired of Hilary Clintons indifference to political sacrifice of a diplomat and navy seals. Ronald reagan did not forget about the terrorists in Lebanon, nor did he forget those whom served and gsve the ultimate sacrifice so weasels like Hilary Clinton and barack Obama can worship at the altar of saul Alinsky. A communist hell bent on destruction of the US whom discipled lunatics like Clinton and much of the Chicago political Machine.
+1
Donald Young unavailable for comment.
The truth is not a hype.
That’s a good point. There are risks with releasing their names. However, there is also an element of safety by making them ‘real’, not just a Witness’. It actually may offer protection, as long as they are under security.
Sure would be nice to know how/why the names were released.
On the other hand I guess in a way it could sort of protect them since if anything happens to them or their family now and from now on. We will be all over it should anything happen.
Its definitely all over the web. Gateway, Godlike, fnc you name it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.