Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Congressman Fincher Introduces Welfare Integrity Act of 2013
Congressman Fincher's website ^ | 3/4/13 | Congressman Fincher

Posted on 03/05/2013 3:31:10 PM PST by ksen

Washington, D.C. – Friday, U.S. Representative Stephen Fincher (R-Frog Jump) introduced the Welfare Integrity Act of 2013, requiring random drug testing for illegal substances for welfare applicants and recipients.

The bill requires each state participating in the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program to certify that applicants and current recipients are being randomly test for illegal drug use. In order to pass constitutional muster, the bill requires states to provide a consent and waiver form, where applicants are given the choice to waive their Fourth Amendment Rights and submit to a random drug test. If welfare beneficiaries fail a drug test or are arrested on a drug related offense, they will be unable to receive the benefit and cannot reapply for one year. Further, the legislation requires states that receive funding from the TANF program to certify that there is a program in place to test 20% of applicants and recipients for illegal drugs. States that do not comply would forfeit 10% of their TANF funding.

“Currently the federal government enables drug abusers a safety-net by allowing them to participate in the TANF program. Instead of having to make the hard-choice between drugs and other essential needs, abusers are able to rely on their monthly check to help them pay their bills.

“If Washington wants to help families move toward economic stability, we must do our very best to end the cycle of drug abuse. By allowing random drug checks, we can ensure families who receive TANF benefits use them for their intended purpose of feeding, clothing and providing shelter for their children, while cutting the tie that enables drug abuse. It’s not unreasonable to ask folks to stay clean in order to receive federal assistance.”


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; Miscellaneous; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
When people like Jamie Dimon and Lloyd Blankfein have to take a drug test before receiving government money then I'll start taking Congressman Fincher seriously.
1 posted on 03/05/2013 3:31:16 PM PST by ksen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ksen

this is going nowhere - Obama would veto it if it even passed the house and senate. obama will not alienate his base, drug addicts, welfare recipients, frauds and cheats


2 posted on 03/05/2013 3:39:25 PM PST by hondact200 (Candor dat viribos alas (sincerity gives wings to strength) and Nil desperandum (never despair))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ksen

Uhmmm, this isn’t just about subverting a persons 4th it also impairs their 5th and the right to not self incrimnate.

Once it established as precedent it can be used against those who receive college loans, as they are government subsidies and anyone covered by ObamaCare®.

In fact, it could be argued that everyone travels the highway or goods they receive are federally subsidized as travel is on federally subsidized roads.


3 posted on 03/05/2013 3:41:15 PM PST by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously, you won't live through it anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ksen

I congratulate Congressman Fincher, for being the first to step forward, and embrace the idea that those on government assistance MUST accept the ‘nanny concept’, i.e., while suckling at the government teat, nanny government has complete control of your life!

I define ‘the government teat’, as welfare programs, unemployment assistance, food stamp programs, government-supplied communication programs, and NOT Social Security and Veterans’ Disability payments.

However, all of us who do NOT, should be left the hell alone!


4 posted on 03/05/2013 3:43:22 PM PST by Terry L Smith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vendome

Governor Scott of Florida tried implementing this and I’m sure it had nothing to do with his “former” company, his wife still had control of it, benefiting from performing the drug tests.


5 posted on 03/05/2013 3:45:09 PM PST by ksen (". . . organized greed always defeats disorganized democracy" - Matt Taibbi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ksen

There are certainly people who abuse human kindness. But don’t look at all low income people as criminals and drug abusers. Most of them are just like us. There are congresscritters who are corrupt and steal from the public but you don’t propose testing yourselves to make sure you aren’t on the take. When you set the same rules for yourselves that you demand of others, then then let’s talk.


6 posted on 03/05/2013 3:45:09 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Terry L Smith
I define ‘the government teat’, as welfare programs, unemployment assistance, food stamp programs, government-supplied communication programs, and NOT Social Security and Veterans’ Disability payments.

I notice you left out all the programs through which big corps receive billions in Fed $$$'s.

So it's fair to say you approve of big government drug-testing for all those receiving money from programs you disagree with?

7 posted on 03/05/2013 3:48:12 PM PST by ksen (". . . organized greed always defeats disorganized democracy" - Matt Taibbi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ksen

The FL legislature passed the bill, Scott signed it, and a federal court shot it down.


8 posted on 03/05/2013 3:54:54 PM PST by Jacquerie ("How few were left who had seen the republic!" - Tacitus, The Annals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ksen

“Welfare Integrity”

What an Oxymoron.


9 posted on 03/05/2013 4:02:06 PM PST by MNDude (Guns don't kill people, Democrats kill people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vendome

“Uhmmm, this isn’t just about subverting a persons 4th it also impairs their 5th and the right to not self incriminate.”

I don’t think it’s too much to ask for folks that are getting welfare not spend it on drugs. If they got a job and supported themselves, in most cases they would also have the same random screening.


10 posted on 03/05/2013 4:02:57 PM PST by babygene ( .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ksen
I think all of our elected representatives in the House and Senate need to be drug tested and take an alcohol consumption test before all votes.
11 posted on 03/05/2013 4:15:07 PM PST by Bronzy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ksen

Ksen is a liberal troll who will only waste your time continuously defeating his lame questions. Zot bait anyone?


12 posted on 03/05/2013 4:16:30 PM PST by Uncle Miltie (Due Process 2013: "Burn the M*****-F***er Down!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vendome

I was all for this until my mom got caught in the trap. Now I see how they play their little game.

She’s disabled, but turns 63 and everything changes this year for retirement. She has to switch from Medicaid to Medicare.

She was given an EBT card, due to her disability (for the purpose of buying food) that she refuses to use. She figured that she can get by with barter and helping working family members garden and can their food in exchange for part of the harvest. (She can sit and peel and still has good old fashioned knowledge that most lack).

For more than a year, she’s refused to use the EBT card and has tried to get them to take it back.

THEY REFUSE. They just keep loading more money onto it every month and she keeps yelling at them to KEEP THE MONEY.

She made a deal with her social worker a year ago. If she doesn’t touch it once over a one year period, they’ll cancel it.

So it’s been a year. She just went in to get her evaluation and found out that they’re switching her from Medicaid to Medicare because of her age.

The catch?

She needs to purchase a Medicare supplement for $100 a month for her prescriptions.

But she’s not to worry! They’ll reimburse her that much via her EBT card every month!

The woman was actually smug that she found a way to keep my mom on EBT.

Here I am, a hard-nose conservative that’s been saying for YEARS that we need to crack down on welfare abusers and advocating for this very system. Now my MOM (a sweet little old Christian lady who is a COMPLETE tee-teetotaler) is going to be treated like a criminal and made to pee in a cup because the government is doing their BEST to trap people into this system.

You just wait. Soon it’ll be SSI recipients and people who get VA benefits who have to pee in that same cup.

I’m becoming more and more Libertarian as the days go by. This is about noting more than GOVERNMENT CONTROL. In the end, they’re going to try to trap us all - one way or another.

These are the same people who’re trying to keep us from keeping our own gardens.


13 posted on 03/05/2013 4:30:40 PM PST by Marie ("The last time Democrats gloated this hard after a health care victory, they lost 60 House seats.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Marie

That’s the law of unintended consequences.

On e they get their mitts in yuh, they morph into a boa constrictor and if they don’t take over your life, they squeeze it out of you.


14 posted on 03/05/2013 4:43:31 PM PST by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously, you won't live through it anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ksen
A CongressCritter from Frog Jump?

When he jumps outta that warm water I MIGHT listen to him.

15 posted on 03/05/2013 4:52:10 PM PST by diogenes ghost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vendome

And more unintended consequences when Florida tested this:

Of the 4,086 applicants who scheduled drug tests while the law was enforced, 108 people, or 2.6 percent, failed, most often testing positive for marijuana. About 40 people scheduled tests but canceled them, according to the Department of Children and Families, which oversees Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, known as the TANF program.

The numbers, confirming previous estimates, show that taxpayers spent $118,140 to reimburse people for drug test costs, at an average of $35 per screening.

The state’s net loss? $45,780.


16 posted on 03/05/2013 5:19:17 PM PST by rudabaga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: babygene
I don’t think it’s too much to ask for folks that are getting welfare not spend it on drugs. If they got a job and supported themselves, in most cases they would also have the same random screening.

Good, then you also support drug testing Congressmen and people like Jamie Dimon?

17 posted on 03/05/2013 5:54:51 PM PST by ksen (". . . organized greed always defeats disorganized democracy" - Matt Taibbi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Miltie
Ksen is a liberal troll who will only waste your time continuously defeating his lame questions. Zot bait anyone?

I can understand why you'd see demanding a bit of consistency from conservative members of congress as "liberal trolling" and asking for a zot instead of addressing the issue.

But here's another example of conservatives backing big government.

18 posted on 03/05/2013 5:57:37 PM PST by ksen (". . . organized greed always defeats disorganized democracy" - Matt Taibbi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ksen

“Good, then you also support drug testing Congressmen and people like Jamie Dimon?”

Yes I do...


19 posted on 03/05/2013 6:46:16 PM PST by babygene ( .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson